Home made penstyle atty

[NoizMaker]

Two things to say in light of this thread/ my 2 cents;

1) Carlos, you have done an amazing job setting up a functional atomizer from scratch, if you sell them I will buy some, and when you post your step-by-step I'll be studying your design tentatively making sure to mention your brand of atomizers in my video and doing a complete review.

I'll gladly do any product demos for you now or in the future!!!

2) I actually LOVE seeing the marketplace within this community. It's like the freeBSD/ Linux of vaping!
No doubt everyone is just as excited as I am that once this walkthrough is posted, we can now come to ECF and learn how to make an e-cig from the ground up... Or probably just ask Carlos to do it ... for a price of course.

[moktarino]

Less kudos, more details.

[crazyhorse]

Give the guy a break moktarino. He had a serious emergency medical problem a while back and he's still trying recover from it.

If you're in that much of a hurry, do your own research and do your own work.

[moktarino]

Sorry, I don't mean to be insensitive.

Also, I am doing my own work and my own research.

So there.

[redrhino]

Glad you did this. We need a better atty!

[Quit4myKids]

This thread has been very quiet lately. I can understand if Carlos decided not to post the step-by-step considering the flames that have been posted here. Honestly, I can't understand how people can be so critical over something they are 1) getting for free, and 2) wouldn't have otherwise.

Carlos, I hope your medical problems are past, and I wish you the best. Personally (and I'm sure I'm not the only one) would like to see the step-by-step if you are up to making it. Even a description would be nice, since we all agree that the atomizers we are forced to use now are most definitely not as well engineered as they could be.

Great work, and I hope to see more of it. I will continue to watch this thread.

Q4mK

[moktarino]

Honestly, I can't understand how people can be so critical over something they are 1) getting for free, and 2) wouldn't have otherwise.
Q4mK

Uhh, I would hardly consider my comments to be flames unless you're a particularly sensitive person. I'm not interested in flaming anybody, just getting impatient with what I consider to be a rather high butt-kissing to data ratio, 'cos I'm all about the data.

From what I understand though, Carlos49's been swapping out the 40ga coils in regular attys with 32ga, making them beefier and less prone to breakage, although it will be interesting to see what that does to battery life.

Thoughts, Carlos?

[Quit4myKids]

moktarino: I've read many of your posts, and I think you have a great deal of skill and experience that you can contribute to ECF, and are doing a great job of contributing on the glass atty thread.

I don't think anyone here is particularly sensitive, but perhaps you could consider how motivated you generally are to do volunteer work when you are very ill or in pain. I think myself and others here are just suggesting that you have a little compassion. I will ask a simple question, then I'm stepping away: How many posts to you see in this thread asking Carlos to hurry up with the step-by-step (especially after he posted that he was having medical issues), vs. how many are simply waiting patiently for him to heal and get back to his routine?

Carlos, I hope you are back to it soon. We miss your contributions.

Q4mK

[moktarino]

The discussion has strayed from its initial purpose. While there is a high likelihood that this "compassion" to which you refer has high relative value to units elsewhere, it is unrelated to the acquisition of precious, precious data. Allow me to slip into the mother tongue, as this highly relevant idiom loses significant meaning in translation:

01010011011010000110111101110111001000000111010101 11001100100000011101000110100001100101001000000110 01000110000101110100011000010010000100100000001000 00010100100110111101100010011011110111010001110011 00100000011000010111001001100101001000000110001001 10010101110100011101000110010101110010001000000111 01000110100001100001011011100010000001101110011010 010110111001101010011000010111001100101110

I think that combines all the relevant values of this conversation into a single, larger number, reducing the number of distracting surface features to a minimum.

As an aside, it may be advisable to report to central authority for an operational screening. Based on our interaction it is possible you may be experiencing out-of-tolerance operation as a result of improperly adjusted unique attribute settings.

[roadkilldeluxe]

00100010 01100100 01101111 01100011 00100010 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101111 01101101 00100000 01100010 01100001 01100011 01101011 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110101 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101 00100000 00111110 00111101 00100000 01100011 01111001 01100010 01101111 01110010 01100111 01110011 00100000 00111110 00100000 01110010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01110011 00100000 00111110 00100000 01101110 01101001 01101110 01101010 01100001 01110011