+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
Why is the 401 ignored? in Modding Forum; Originally Posted by breakfastchef Luv, I quit analogs with an NJOY penstlye device. I was a heavy smoker of analogs. ...
  1. #11
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    666

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breakfastchef View Post
    Luv, I quit analogs with an NJOY penstlye device. I was a heavy smoker of analogs. What keeps me off analogs is a 6 volt device running a penstlye atomizer. Everyone has their own taste and preference. I could never go ack to a 3.7 volts device, ever. I own a 401 and it is a nice little device, the cartridge is way to small and the throat hit is less than I can accept. I keep my 401 and a 901 devices for emergencies. Assuming nothing ever goes wrong, I could not currently survive without my 6 volt Super-T1 with a BE112 atomizer and my DIY Passthrough with an 801 atomizer.
    So, in using a penstyle, a 901, and 401... how did you then determine that the 801 is what you wanted with a mod (6v)- which by the way... I would still only need a 3.7 mod myself... I am not sure why I want to try one, I think for my husband it is just to have a device that has "power"- a man thing, I guess...
    Why do you not use the 901 w/ a mod? & yes, the mention of the cart size... I will say it would be ideal if every time Ipicked up my 401 I didn't need to worry if I was soon needing to refill or change carts... Mine do seem to last longer than others report but again, I think it is due to my vape style- (I am not a puff, puff, puff, inhale, puff again, inhale and then exhale...- rather I draw a nice long easy draw, don't even hit the 401 cut off, and then I inhale, then exhale...) so the amount of liquid being vaped in that instance may be less than a multiple puffer/inhaler before exhale... (Did I even explain that right?) LOL
    This is giving me some good information but needing to understand the relation between the atty type performance to mod and the difference from the regular e-cig...
    I can accept if the 401 is not ideal for a mod due to the amount of liquid needed to really enjoy it, or the airflow issue preventing it from working w/o a total revamp of a mod, or the power of the battery causing the 401 to burn out quickly versus another atty able to handle the power more easily...
    Just needing to know why and what the differences are...
    Again, you chose the 801 even after having the other models... What was your reason behind your choice?
    Thx so much-

  2. Advertisement
  3. #12
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    666

    Default

    Breakfastchef,
    I just noticed you are here... I thought you made the meet today...
    Did you?

  4. #13
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran CHUCKLEHEAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Redneck Rivera
    Posts
    1,833

    Default

    Some one justhad a chuck made with a 401
    2 GGTS/AVS 1 SS GGTS/UFS

  5. #14
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Basically, the 401 atomizer is not very robust. As such, it is not a primary target for modifications as vapor and throat hit performance pales to atomizers like the 510, 901 and 801. The 401 atomizer is better suited to the infrequent or light analog smoker.
    You gotta be joking!!!!

    I've been vaping for over a year now and tried nearly all the e-cigs out there

    and the Evo/(401), IMO, is the most reliable and durable atomiser of all.

    Btw I'm a very heavy vapour.
    Last edited by mickeyxxx; 11-15-2009 at 10:28 AM.

  6. #15
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    23

    Default a bit confused myself

    I've only been vaping a short while, and so far, the only e-cigs I've tried are the 401 on a passthrough and my joy 510 w/ it's battery-in-place passthrough. While not a truely fair comparison since my experience with the 510 is still limited to 3.7V, I much prefer my 401 for throat/lung hit. The 510 does seem to produce more vapor, but it doesn't seem to hit nearly as hard. I use 35mg/ml e-juice (vtvapor) with direct dripping (the 401 almost demands it, since the cart is so small) the 401 always has the better hit.

    Aside from the obvious capacity advantage of the 501 here is what I've noticed so far:
    501
    Lots of vapor
    Lots of heat
    Very free draw (mine are all 4 hole)
    Does well with tobacco flavors
    Subtle flavors get washed out
    Generally a very robust atomizer with consistent performance

    401
    Very efficient (good vapor for the quantity of juice consumed)
    Produces a relatively low temperature vapor
    Works best with longer, slower draws
    Better flavor with sweeter flavors

    Maybe the 510 would really perk-up on 5V. I look forward to finding out, but right now, my wish list includes a long life 5V battery mod and some kind of auto-drip for my 401.

    ..Oh, and maybe a ceramic tip to avoid the plastic-y taste that all e-cigs seem to suffer from in some fashion.

  7. #16
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran Wench's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pensacola, Fl.
    Posts
    1,491

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luv2CUSmile View Post
    in response to Wench...

    So, in order for them to allow the 401 atty to be used, a piece would have to be made w/ another hole for airflow that the atty would connect to the mod with... and the mod itself would have to continue that airflow hole? & w/o the additional airhole the atty would not work properly? So if the other models don't have that hole... how do some people manage to get liquid in the battery? OR do people w/ the other models not worry about liquid in the battery? (I hadn't noticed It has not happened to me so it confused me to first read that it even happened until I noticed the hole and if the atty let liquid drip through)...

    I was wondering what breakfastchef meant when he said robust... I took it to mean the amount of use it could take and maybe he was speaking of something else entirely...
    Is the way the atty would perform, different on a mod than it is on a regular PV? What I mean to ask is, Where a 510 is very hot and has loss of flavor on a 510 batt... on a mod does it have high heat but no loss of flavor? I have seen reports by several people of losing 510 atty's seemingly sooner when used w/ a mod... Am I wrong? Or rather was the info I have seen wrong?
    Thx again, any feedback to help me understand the world of mods...
    Yep they would need to leave holes some how. Maybe cut some grooves? Maybe someone with a rare and elusive 401 prodigy adapter or chuck could post a pic...

    Some mod's even though "sealed" at the battery aren't completely leak proof into the unit depending on how made.hee hee And most auto batteries for these have the center hole open and liquid seeps in where as on the manual versions the battery is soldered closed. The 401 is the only manual I've seen that isn't and can't be due to airflow.

    On mods running at 3.7v it's the same as a regular batt but it's like having a fresh one for much longer and without the swapping out hassle. I prefer this one , at home I can walk around and not change batt's.
    I can't say about 5v as I haven't tried it. 6v is a hella throat hit and vapor but flavor is just ugh to me, seems the higher it goes the less taste there is. You have to watch them because the higher the voltage the more chance to run dry and kill the atty so they must be kept wet hence people frying them left and right and then thrown into the mix is chinese craftsmanship on these lol. Some atty's perform better at the higher voltages than others.

    At 3.7 v most do just fine so it's really just what preference there is to which atty at that voltage which is the same as a standard batt..
    $$ saved = hahaha

  8. #17
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran emus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,241

    Default

    I have been using a M401 atty for about 4 months and it still works perfect.
    As stated above; a M401 mod adapter would have to include an air intake hole.
    I find the 510 atty a bit harsh.

  9. #18
    jj2
    jj2 is offline
    WWB LibaryAnnex Moderator Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    jj2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hundred Acre Wood
    Posts
    24,619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by e-pipeman View Post
    The 401 atomiser is one of the best but is often overlooked. the dse-103 is a tough little atty that also gets overlooked. I'm not a modder so can't say why.
    I got the 102 and it's a pretty touch little atty too but generally unheard of.

  10. #19
    Super Member ECF Veteran nyabzns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Midwest , USA
    Posts
    389

    Default

    It appears to me a good 401 mod would have to also include a slightly bigger cart for the atty.

    I love my 401 but the cart size is a bit small.

    I'd like to see something like a GGslim with a longer cart made for the m401 atty that actually wicks all the juice.

  11. #20
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    28

    Default

    I love my 401 but the cart size is a bit small.
    Try the new Intellicig carts. They hold more juice and wick down to the last drop.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO