Difference between Cisco 306 and HH357

six;6326562 said:

My attys of choice - in order: #1) hh.357 2.0 ohm on my VVPV @ ~4.5v - #2) Ikenvape i06 2.5 ohm on my VV REO Woodville @ ~4.9v - #3) Cisco 306 1.8 ohm on my REO Mini (non voltage regulated mod) @ ~3.4 to 4.0 load volts - #4) Cisco 510 1.8 ohm on any unregulated tube mod on my desk at the time.

The hh.357 gives me more vaper performance and more flavor than any other atty I have tried to date (and I've tried a lot of attys). That's why it is king of the hill in my vaping routine. The VVPV and the hh.357 are almost like they were made for one another. The hh.357 provides a huge amount of vapor from a very short drag. It's the closest thing to an analog drag as I have found.

The i06 has excellent vapor production and very good flavor. In fact, it is top notch flavor. It produces maybe 85% of the flavor of the hh.357. To keep that in perspective, even at 85% of the other one, it is still head and shoulders above any of the normal attys available. It's a great atty.

The Cisco 306 1.8 ohm is a vapor cannon. It produces a nice warm, dense vapor. I have always felt that the 306 tends to lack some flavor, but it makes up for that with a very satisfying vape. 306 is a very efficient attomizer and therefore a more effective nicotine delivery apparatus than many of its counterparts such as the 510. I can't describe the number of times I spun on a 306 to battle a severe craving back when I was still having bad cravings for a smoke regularly. It provides a very satisfying experience.

The Cisco 1.8 ohm 510 provides a little "fluffier" (for lack of a better word) and slightly cooler vape than a 306. Where it shines is flavor. I have always felt my Cisco 510s generated better flavor than my Cisco 306's. I like to drip a Cisco 510 on a tube mod often. They tend to be reliable attys that can take a little abuse

Click to expand...