e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Blogs > DVap
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

The Missing Nicotine

Posted 09-30-2009 at 09:26 AM by DVap
I ran the vaping experiment with an argon trap, and under the conditions I used, for every 1 mg of nicotine vaped, 0.46 mg of nicotine made it into the vapor... 46%.

I've been arguing for some time that there's a "40% rule" in play for vaping versus smoking. I've observed empirically that a good number of vapers who "find their level" tend to vape 2.5X more nicotine per day than they used to smoke per day. At 46%, the multiplier is 2.17, very close to the 2.5 figure I arrived at by observation.

The equivalence is open to discussion and debate, but the experiment does support the idea that atomizers take a toll on nicotine in e-liquids.

I'm looking at designing a further experiment to find the percentage of inhaled nicotine that is exhaled, this represents the last piece of the puzzle (at least as far as I'm capable of working it out).
Submit "The Missing Nicotine" to Digg Submit "The Missing Nicotine" to del.icio.us Submit "The Missing Nicotine" to StumbleUpon Submit "The Missing Nicotine" to Google
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 220 Comments 4 Edit Tags Email Blog Entry
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 4

Comments

  1. Old
    Yeah, I'd be interested in seeing how much is exhaled.
    I'm sure a lot of people would.
    permalink
    Posted 10-28-2009 at 07:00 PM by DC2 DC2 is offline
  2. Old
    DVap's Avatar
    Unfortunately, at the nicotine levels expected in exhaled breath, the exhaled CO2 will impact the determination since CO2 is mildly acidic... enough so to mess things up.

    It can be tested accurately, but not by the method I have at my disposal.
    permalink
    Posted 11-07-2009 at 06:40 AM by DVap DVap is offline
  3. Old
    newkirk's Avatar
    If testing a 'vape-free' exhalation (for CO2 baseline) then comparing to exhalation post 60mg/ml vapor, could enough accuracy be achieved to at least define the ballpark?

    j
    permalink
    Posted 11-10-2009 at 04:04 AM by newkirk newkirk is offline
  4. Old
    DVap's Avatar
    I wouldn't be confident in it.
    permalink
    Posted 11-14-2009 at 01:55 PM by DVap DVap is offline
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184