Newpaper story about "Saving lives by lowering tobacco use act" - Blogs - E-Cigarette Forum
View RSS Feed


Newpaper story about "Saving lives by lowering tobacco use act"

Rate this Entry
by , 09-13-2011 at 10:13 PM (1134 Views)
I went looking today for information regarding whether higher taxes lower the smoking prevelance. The Antis also claim that smoking bans are a big factor in lowering smoking prevalence. It ain't necessarily so. I found this very informative page: Smokefree Women: Smoking in Your State: Data View

A state thatís doing everything "right" is New York. The state has the highest per-pack price for cigarettes at $8.97 and has all three types of smoking ban: work, bar, and restaurant. Yet, New York ranks 25th (in the middle of the pack) for smoking prevalence at 17.9%. Texas has an identical smoking prevalence rate at 17.9%, but has none of the three bans and a pack of cigarette costs $5.47. Georgia has an even lower prevalence rate at 17.6%, has none of the three bans, and a pack costs $4.44.

At a 19% prevalence rate, Virginia is below the national average of 19.3%, but the price for a pack is only $4.44. The information is only partly correct concerning the bans. Virignia does have bans on smoking in all three venues, but--probably because it allows a few exemptions here and there--the word "no" was entered for all three. All restaurants are pretty much smoke-free, but some bars are permitted to allow smoking if they have a specially constructed room that keep the smoke out of the rest of the place. An enterprising Virginian started a web site to provide information to smokers on where they can go to light up: Home This is a clever site name, in view of the fact that "smokefreeva" is the state health department's antismokng web site.

Utah has the absolute lowest prevalence rate at 9.8%, and has all the bans, but does not have that high (relatively speaking) a tax rate, with a pack costing $5.70. Is it possible that the prevailing religious beliefs have a lot more to do with the low smoking rates than any of the other measures? We also see a fairly low (16.3%) prevalence in Idaho, but it doesn't have a work ban or a bar ban, and a pack of smokes is a thrifty $4.53. Idaho also has a large Mormon population which I believe is the biggest factor in its lower smoking rates.

I'm not providing this information because I am pro-smoking. I'd like to help as many people as possible who still smoke to switch to safer alterantive. I believe that this would be a more productive route for government to follow as well. The taxation thing has gotten way out of hand. The oppressive tax rates are creating a huge black market and imposing financial hardships on the poorest members of our society.
cigarbabe and DeeLeeKay like this.

Submit "Newpaper story about "Saving lives by lowering tobacco use act"" to Digg Submit "Newpaper story about "Saving lives by lowering tobacco use act"" to Submit "Newpaper story about "Saving lives by lowering tobacco use act"" to StumbleUpon Submit "Newpaper story about "Saving lives by lowering tobacco use act"" to Google



  1. TezJaguar's Avatar
    I agree. More taxes means more steps towards prohibition, black markets, and crime, as you rightfully point out. It is a little known fact, but it was tobacco taxes, and also tea of course, that helped start the beginnings of the Revolutionary War.