Anyone know if these things were being marketed in the United States prior to February 2007?
Also take a look at line 22 of page 10
22(34) Because the only known safe alternative to
23smoking is cessation, interventions should target all
24 smokers to help them quit completely.
That's language that's a problem for those of us who are promoting harm reduction and that should be language to be targeted by lobbying efforts.
Looks like page 11 is problematic in it's entirety. Although it could actually play to our favor if the above mentioned section were removed because it is pretty clear that electronic cigarettes do indeed "reduce the risks to the public of tobacco use"
Page 12 is pretty nasty as well for us it makes a number of assertions aimed it appears at "light" cigarettes that could catch e-cigs due to sloppiness in the language.
That's as far as I have time to dig in today.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks