+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33
why not just ship with out nicotine in Campaigning; It also says "ship" without...
  1. #21
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    1,970

    Default

    It also says "ship" without

  2. Advertisement
  3. #22
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happily View Post
    It also says "ship" without
    That changes nothing and does nothing to validate your original point. Fail troll is fail.

  4. #23
    Has Spoken ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Surf Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    3,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Babachoo View Post
    That changes nothing and does nothing to validate your original point. Fail troll is fail.
    Well. Evidently someone doesn't like being wrong.

    The word "ship" is the key element in the OPs argument. Ignoring it reflects poorly on you, not him.
    "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." Jonathan Swift

  5. #24
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Surf Monkey View Post

    Well. Evidently someone doesn't like being wrong.

    The word "ship" is the key element in the OPs argument. Ignoring it reflects poorly on you, not him.
    I thought "without nicotine" carried mroe weight than "shipping". His suggestion is to only ship 0mg carts, which would mean that we would be responsible for adding nicotine ourselves. So his point is rediculous and your attempt to back it up doesn't even back up what he was saying. But whatever.

  6. #25
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Baja Alabama
    Posts
    569

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
    The time for a suggestion like this has long passed. As for the devices, the FDA is quite clear about them being medical devices and under FDA purview.
    Actually, FDA recently told my senator "FDA has not taken steps to ban the importation of such products." Then, they pass the buck of responsibility with "Congress has directed the Agency, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act)..."

    Look here to read the letter from FDA.
    http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...rd-shelby.html
    Last edited by crazyhorse; 07-08-2009 at 06:24 PM. Reason: Punctuation/typo

  7. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Shipping just the device, and then we buy our nic juice from home brew or however.. Makes perfect sense to me. Don't see how they can ban an empty device that does nothing by itself.

  8. #27
    Re-Member ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    chad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBrat View Post
    Well it would seem that since JC is the only distributer that touts making their own juice, or having the ability to, they may soon have a monopoly.
    Unless they're getting their nicotine from China.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBrat View Post
    The issue with the devices, the FDA has pointed out, that they can be use to smoke crack ........
    The FDA is full of propaganda to support their power grab for legislation over these devices. If they "officially" use this as an argument, there will be much litigation over it. It is an non-defensible argument against the devices. They say that only to sway public opinion which will be the "real" battle that must be fought - control of public opinion.

  9. #28
    Super Member ECF Veteran sattec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    mcallen texas
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smokinsimon View Post
    Shipping just the device, and then we buy our nic juice from home brew or however.. Makes perfect sense to me. Don't see how they can ban an empty device that does nothing by itself.
    the raw tobacco or other products needed to produce your own juice would/will skyrocket as the fda would regulate the products....growing your own tobacco in your yard is not even safe.

  10. #29
    Has Spoken ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Surf Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    3,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Babachoo View Post
    I thought "without nicotine" carried mroe weight than "shipping". His suggestion is to only ship 0mg carts, which would mean that we would be responsible for adding nicotine ourselves. So his point is rediculous and your attempt to back it up doesn't even back up what he was saying. But whatever.
    Yes it does. "Ship" basically means "sell" in this context. In other words, you buy the PV without any nicotine products attached. That does NOT mean that you can't buy nicotine liquid separately. There are plenty of outlets that only sell the liquid. Johnson Creek for example. The idea here is to decouple the device from the drug. I'm not sure why some people are having a hard time grasping the concept.
    "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." Jonathan Swift

  11. #30
    Has Spoken ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Surf Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    3,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazyhorse View Post
    Actually, FDA told recently told my senator "FDA has not taken steps to ban the importation of such products." Then, they pass the buck of responsibility with "Congress has directed the Agency, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act)...

    Look here to read the letter from FDA.
    http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...rd-shelby.html
    Exactly. As I said, FDA policy towards PVs is not written in stone at this point. They're taking shipments on a case by case basis and they have no formalized regulatory framework around them.

    It's important to understand that this fight is far from over. Don't succumb to the pessimists here who would suggest otherwise.
    "When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." Jonathan Swift

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO