Contact Schwarzenegger to oppose SB 400, CA ban - Form Letter

[alron]

I tweeted at him about this. One can hope that he is paying attention. I mean, I don't source any of my parts and liquids from shops in California, but as a resident the last thing I want is for my goods to be illegal in the state.

[IMetalGearVaporXI~]

Sent in an email thanks for the notification Kam.

[1inchgroup]

Bump

Emailed my own version of that about a week ago.

[tmandarano]

I just emailed him. However, are we sure that this bill will make e-cigarettes illegal? How come there is no press about it?

[1inchgroup]

Link to the bill

It prohibits the sale until the FDA approves them.

[Kamanjah]

This is the correct link to the (html) text of the bill sitting on the governor's desk. Link to pdf file. Hopefully CASAA will have all this info compiled soon!

I was also asked by a mod to refrain from contacting people on this forum about this issue, so if you read this and know someone from CA, make sure they know that if Governor Schwarzenegger doesn't veto this thing by Oct 11, it will become law. Action will be taken to halt the sale of electronic cigarettes in CA. Request your family and friends to become involved.

The more Veto SB 400 messages that are seen in Sacramento, the better chance we have of at least having electronic cigarettes stricken from this otherwise redundant legislation - all it does besides ban e-cigs is repeat existing legislation and calls agents of the Public Heath Department Peace Officers while conducting enforcement activities. That scares me.

So, I'll back off and wait. I've done what I can at this point.

Thanks to everyone who contacted the governor's office.
Kamanjah

[katink]

I was also asked by a mod to refrain from contacting people on this forum about this issue,...

Surely this can't be a new policy of ECF ??
'Refrain from fighting the fight to keep e-cigs legal' ???

I hope SJ can tell us a reason for not wanting these actions on this board - or can tell us this was some kind of message that was mistakenly interpreted. I totally don't understand where a reason for this could be coming from?

[HaploVoss]

Surely this can't be a new policy of ECF ??
'Refrain from fighting the fight to keep e-cigs legal' ???

I hope SJ can tell us a reason for not wanting these actions on this board - or can tell us this was some kind of message that was mistakenly interpreted. I totally don't understand where a reason for this could be coming from?

Agreed. That seems really odd.

[C2Girl]

HUH????

I just dont get it either......We N E E D to keep up the info....or WHY have this forum????

I need answers....NO.....I E X P E C T the *mod* to post here if in fact that was true.....

VERY SAD INDEED IF TRUE.....would not be analog free almost 6 months if not for this forum....but what a joke it is turning out to be,,,,

SHAME ON YOU

[SmokeyJoe]

I was also asked by a mod to refrain from contacting people on this forum about this issue, so if you read this and know someone from CA

First I've heard of this, and totally bizarre if a mod did do this. I'll check to see what happened - I'm assuming it's a misinterpretation