+ Reply to Thread
Page 52 of 76 FirstFirst ... 24248495051525354555662 ... LastLast
Results 511 to 520 of 755
Like Tree1Likes
Any interest in determining nicotine--by DVAP in Tips and Tricks; Originally Posted by TheLizinator I don't know about anyone else, but I have to wonder with all the gabillions of ...
  1. #511
    PV Master ECF Veteran kinabaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london uk / beijing china
    Posts
    4,987
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLizinator View Post
    I don't know about anyone else, but I have to wonder with all the gabillions of dollars Philip Morris has poured into researching a safer smoke, they haven't even come CLOSE to the technology vapers are enjoying. I'm one of those people who tried the Eclipse dud they developed. UGH, the taste of those things was NASTY. If they are opposing the PV, I just have to wonder if they aren't kicking themselves for not coming up with something similar (or even close to the relatively elegant design of our PVs). Major DUH to Philip Morris and the rest of the corporate tobacco goons.
    afaik, there's no reason that they cannot enter the market as e-liquid makers.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #512
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Away..
    Posts
    1,786

    Default

    Here ya go Kin,

    "You'll also find that ammonia is a common ingredient that is often added to your cigarette. Ammonia is toxic, and you may recognize the scent very easily; it is a common ingredient for use in commercial cleansers. For cigarettes, you'll find that ammonia is used to help the nicotine get absorbed through your lungs more quickly. You'll find that this can give your cigarette more of a punch, and your brain will be able to process a larger amount of nicotine with each puff."

    Daily Blog Buzz: What Goes Into Commercial Cigarettes?

  4. Advertisement
  5. #513
    On Break Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    DVap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    In the lab
    Posts
    1,121
    Blog Entries
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kinabaloo View Post
    afaik, there's no reason that they cannot enter the market as e-liquid makers.
    True, but a host of reasons why they likely won't.


  6. #514
    PV Master ECF Veteran kinabaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london uk / beijing china
    Posts
    4,987
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaporer View Post
    Here ya go Kin,

    "You'll also find that ammonia is a common ingredient that is often added to your cigarette. Ammonia is toxic, and you may recognize the scent very easily; it is a common ingredient for use in commercial cleansers. For cigarettes, you'll find that ammonia is used to help the nicotine get absorbed through your lungs more quickly. You'll find that this can give your cigarette more of a punch, and your brain will be able to process a larger amount of nicotine with each puff."

    Daily Blog Buzz: What Goes Into Commercial Cigarettes?
    I knew that, but for a moment I thought we were talking some kind of e-cig.

  7. #515
    PV Master ECF Veteran kinabaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london uk / beijing china
    Posts
    4,987
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DVap View Post
    True, but a host of reasons why they likely won't.
    It wouldn't be good for our image. Though it would give them a reason not to oppose (so strongly) a competitor to analogs.

    Still not clear if the highly purified nic is ever not from tobacco (i.e. synthetic). So in a way, perhaps they are already part of the market.

    ps: the MIBs have left now, just said not to mention the cow dung again.

    Oh s*** !

  8. #516
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Away..
    Posts
    1,786

    Default

    Liz,

    I wouldn't be surprized if BT didn't release thier own version and I'd bet alot of all this crap going on is the reason.
    FDA restricts all foreign imports of PV's and e liquid while BT tools thiers up and then the FDA will say....ok........."you can sell your because you follow our rules and pay us big $ !"
    Wouldn't surprize me in the least.

    Seems odd all the ingredients are FDA approved, not just for this purpose or this particular combination. You know BT has lost a ton of money already to vaping. What if it REALLY caught on?

  9. #517
    Senior Member ECF Veteran TheLizinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    291
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    afaik, there's no reason that they cannot enter the market as e-liquid makers
    Well, you'd think, wouldn't you? Are they really that dense that they can't see how they've had tunnel vision all these years about replacing tobacco with something far more innocuous? Their "3rd generation" electrical heated cigarette seems so archaic compared to our rapidly evolving vapers. What's wrong with them that they would leave themselves spinning their wheels while the market is being flooded with new and improved versions of the e-cig? Just makes no sense to me.

  10. #518
    PV Master ECF Veteran kinabaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london uk / beijing china
    Posts
    4,987
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLizinator View Post
    Well, you'd think, wouldn't you? Are they really that dense that they can't see how they've had tunnel vision all these years about replacing tobacco with something far more innocuous? Their "3rd generation" electrical heated cigarette seems so archaic compared to our rapidly evolving vapers. What's wrong with them that they would leave themselves spinning their wheels while the market is being flooded with new and improved versions of the e-cig? Just makes no sense to me.
    The device is patented, but can be licensed for a small fee per unit or a lump sum, or something.

    But juice is not under patent, afaik.

    But as DVap intimated, BT is heavily invested in analogs and they'd like to stick with that (although it's only going t go down, one way or another).

  11. #519
    On Break Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    DVap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    In the lab
    Posts
    1,121
    Blog Entries
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kinabaloo View Post
    It wouldn't be good for our image. Though it would give them a reason not to oppose (so strongly) a competitor to analogs.

    Still not clear if the highly purified nic is ever not from tobacco (i.e. synthetic). So in a way, perhaps they are already part of the market.

    ps: the MIBs have left now, just said not to mention the cow dung again.

    Oh s*** !
    I'd guess that the highly purified nicotine is natural. The price of optically pure (+)-nicotine (the non-natural version) is outragious. Optically pure (-)-nicotine from a synthetic route would likely be similarly outragious. Common sense would seem to dictate that if you have an optically pure source (tobacco), you wouldn't muck about with an involved synthesis (that would then require purification). You'd start with the natural material and purify from there. IMO.


  12. #520
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    877

    Default

    About pharma-grade nicotine source, from the person who probably knows best:

    Nicotine in TW liquid versus Nicotine Gum and Patches


    Quote Originally Posted by Bryndoc
    snip...
    Except for smoking, chewing and other uses of tobacco, I was wondering where the nicotine is coming from in its various uses like TW liquid and quit-smoking products in pharmacies (chemists) or by prescription
    ...snip
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick OTeen
    snip...
    It is all extracted from tobacco - whether it's served up in gum, patches, tamponhalators, lozenges, nicowater or ejuice. It is possible to synthesize nicotine, but it's not remotely cost effective for industrial of pharmaceutical applications (last time I looked, a few synthesized forms were available in mg quantities from some of the larger chemical companies for typically >100x the cost of tobacco-extracted nicotine of even pharmaceutical purity.)
    ...snip
    Plus other info in that post about 'tobacco-specific nitrosamines' (TSNA's)

    I think I said somewhere I thought might be synthetic , but it's not.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO