Should have remembered a bit better from my 13 years in the lab,
this was second nature to me at the time, so:
retracting the comments I made earlier about potential 'other' amine forms not being titratable,
they are, since of course a lot of of primary, secondary and tertiary amine compounds
give a titration between freebase and ionised form.
Even quaternary amines, which are always ionised,
but still can be put into OH counter-ion form and can be titrated.
If the 'main' tertiary amine nitrogen in nicotine (the one being titrated)
were decomposed to molecules containing primary & secondary amines,
there is still likely to be a titration value, depending on the
types and conformation of other atoms bonding with the nitrogen.
The titration curve shape could be significantly altered,
although some break-down products would have a very similar quantification
but at a different pH titration end-point (e.g. pyridine).
Another question is then, how much of the 'recovered' nicotine in the vapour,
as determined by titration, actually is nicotine.
i.e. as a seperate concern to whatever happened to the 'missing nicotine'
between juice and vapour.
Although have to say the curve for that first vapour recovery, looked very
close to to the shape of straight nicotine.
A simple surprisingly-specific precipitation of nicotine with dodeca-silicotungstic acid
looks like an accurate method of quantifying the actual nictone,
http://www.coresta.org/recommended_methods/crm_39.pdf
could then subtract from the titre to see if 'other non-nicotine-nitrogen titre' exists.
In itself the above gravimetric method might well be a lot more reliable than titration,
would need an accurate balance (+ some consumables & a bit more patience/time though),
still it's a very simple lab procedure compared to some other possibly useful procedures,
e.g. like total-nitrogen determination by Kjeldahl digestion.



1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks