e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > E-cigarette News
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

E-cigarette News Seen a news story? Feel free to comment on it in here...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2009, 10:36 PM   #1
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 300
Default E-Cigarettes Under Fire--WebMD Article

Seems to be more of the same - relatively bi-partisan...

E-Cigarettes Under Fire
CJsKee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:50 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Sun Vaporer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,743
Post No Logic Here--But I did Not Expect Any

Well lets see--what does happen when you take away all the tar from smoking--common sense would say that is good--but as reported:

What happens to someone who stops inhaling the tars of cigarettes and just inhales nicotine? We don't know," Edelman says. "We are talking about use that might be three years, five years, 10 years, we just don't know. Once you have the nicotine habit, you are not likely to quit."
Rather than quit, e-cigarettes might worsen users' nicotine habits, says Michael Eriksen, ScD, director of the institute of public health at Atlanta's Georgia State University and former director of CDC's office of smoking and health.
"I have seen no evidence that people switch from tobacco cigarettes to e-cigarettes or other smokeless tobacco products," Eriksen tells WebMD. "If you look at how smokeless products are marketed, they are sold as something to use at times you can't smoke. The implication is you will increase nicotine exposure, not reduce smoking. We'll just be encouraging people to use more nicotine."

So--again if I read this correctly, all the e-cig is good for is to encourage people to use Nicotine? There just simple is no logic to that, but then again there is no logic to the FDA and all the Politics that go behind all the nonsense--That is my take on it----------Sun

Last edited by Sun Vaporer; 04-21-2009 at 10:57 PM.
Sun Vaporer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:59 PM   #3
Supporting Member
 
BARENETTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NEW JERSEY, USA
Posts: 992
Default

Right Sun. I am so sick of idiots. The more I read, the more I think lack of nicotine to the brain causes stupidity and ignorance and zero common sense. Sad.
__________________
Smokefree since January 5, 2009!
BARENETTED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 11:20 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Hangar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 250
Default

although he is misinformed and cannot possibly see this from a smokers point of view, I DO have to partially agree with his comment which eludes to the possibility of actually increasing our nicotine intake worsening our addiction...that part at least is true, in many cases...but not all of course.
Hangar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 11:30 PM   #5
ECF Veteran
 
strayling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle, USA
Posts: 1,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Vaporer View Post
Well lets see--what does happen when you take away all the tar from smoking--common sense would say that is good--but as reported:

...

"If you look at how smokeless products are marketed, they are sold as something to use at times you can't smoke. The implication is you will increase nicotine exposure, not reduce smoking. We'll just be encouraging people to use more nicotine."
Neat little catch-22 there. Market them as an NRT and the FDA shuts you down. Don't make any claims and people like this guy twist things to say that they're marketed as a way to increase nicotine intake.
__________________
"How beautiful it is to get up and go out and do something. We are here on earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you different." - Kurt Vonnegut
strayling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 11:32 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Sun Vaporer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,743
Post I do not but that at all

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hangar View Post
although he is misinformed and cannot possibly see this from a smokers point of view, I DO have to partially agree with his comment which eludes to the possibility of actually increasing our nicotine intake worsening our addiction...that part at least is true, in many cases...but not all of course.

Hanger--from what I read on the posts--most are trying to cut down and then go to no-nicotine. So to the contrary, I do not see the e-cig "worsening" anybody's addiction.--Sorry, but I simply do not buy that.

Many people are taking the ill-fated postion that all aspects of the e-cig should be examined for "possibly negative effects" that are speculative, like children maybe getting hooked on them because they are "Cool" or the possible further addiction of "nicotine". WELL--how about looking at the e-cig with an eye to real harm reduction when they go under the microsope. Although there is no peer group studies as of yet, there are in fact some studies that suggest the e-cig is safer coupled with some common sense and the fact that there are no negitive studies. --------------Sun
Sun Vaporer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 11:55 PM   #7
Super Moderator
 
Jim Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, Texas / USA
Posts: 3,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Vaporer View Post
Hanger--from what I read on the posts--most are trying to cut down and then go to no-nicotine. So to the contrary, I do not see the e-cig "worsening" anybody's addiction.--Sorry, but I simply do not buy that.
I gotta agree with ya. I bought heavy nic e-juice, but ended up cutting it waaaaay down in favor of more vapor. I can feel minor withdrawal symptoms, but not bad, and I enjoy the basic vaping. Now, analog cigs smell nasty.
Jim Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 12:49 AM   #8
Supporting Member
 
Rexa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 319
Blog Entries: 3
Default

I agree and disagree with that article but it still comes down to each individual's habits/preferences. I have switched to higher nicotine eliquid and per each vaping session I probably get more nicotine in my system than I would with cigarettes but how much nicotine I take in overall in one day is still probably less than how my smoking habits were because I don't use the e-cig every hour unlike when I would smoke an analog every hour (or even half an hour).

I think the first 3 or 4 days I was OD'ing on the stuff because I was still having analog withdrawels but afterwards, I feel now that I simply don't need to puff on the e-cig all the time. In fact, I just forget about it now sometimes when I'm at work or when in the middle of a long activity.
__________________
Currently Using: Screwdriver (out of retirement!)

Retired: DSE901 // DSE801 // LadyPipe // Jantystick

Last edited by Rexa; 04-22-2009 at 12:51 AM.
Rexa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 01:01 AM   #9
One & Only Wicked Witch
 
Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Watertown, WI
Posts: 2,992
Blog Entries: 7
Send a message via AIM to Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah Send a message via Yahoo to Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah
Default

Quote:
Most point to a Ruyan-funded study by tobacco researcher Murray Laugesen, MBChB, of Health New Zealand, a private research firm.
Laugesen analyzed Ruyan e-cigarettes and found nothing inherently bad in them -- that is, they contained what they said they contained and posed little threat of immediate harm.
About this study - was it good enough for Chineese health officials to allow Ruyan to market their products in China? If so, why isn't it good enough for the rest of the world? Tell me why this can't be a baseline for the effectiveness of the concept of the product???

Quote:
But this was not a clinical study, notes Norman Edelman, MD, chief medical officer of the American Lung Association, one of the organizations that has called for an FDA ban on e-cigarettes.
"Laugesen is trying to project what the effects of e-cigarettes might be, but he doesn't really know," Edelman tells WebMD. "There are no clinical studies of long-term use of these products."
I get the feeling any study done to prove ecigs will meet the same fate....some stuffed shirt official will pick the study apart, never mind how shakey the arguement is against it.......


Quote:
"Will e-cigarettes get fewer people smoking? Or will people start with e-cigarettes and graduate to tobacco cigarettes? It is unknown whether these things are good, bad, or indifferent
e-cigs becoming a "gateway" to regular cigs? As if anyone, once they've become accustomed to the vape of an ecig, would go to an analog's "taste-o-ass" voluntarily? How many comments are there in this forum alone about the taste of analogs after just a day or 2 of vaping????
__________________
There's a new playground in town: Emerald Vapers
ONE purpose, ONE goal, ONE MILLION voices raised with ONE message! - Our right to VAPE!
Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 01:20 AM   #10
V-V
Senior Member
 
V-V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 182
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Taste-O-Ass.

Exactly. Why would anyone voluntarily go back to stinky hair, stinky house, stinky clothes? I know I won't be, even if I have to soak tobacco leaves in water to make my own juice. (which IS dangerous)
V-V is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
media, publicity, reporting

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184