FDA Sued Over Electronic Cigarette Embargo - Page 2 - e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Wildsky · 04-29-2009, 06:45 PM

Best news of the day right here!

esmok-e · 04-29-2009, 06:46 PM

While I'm not thrilled with their product or kiosk kooks, I give them a major KUDO on this! SE split from Smoke Fifty One last year so we have that in common... long story for another time.

Caesarea · 04-29-2009, 06:46 PM

I wish them luck. Is the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia a good venue for this??

Being an ignorant Brit I guess that is in Washington DC?????

C.

Jim Davis · 04-29-2009, 06:48 PM

Good news! The only thing that I didn't like about the article was "and their makers market them as a risk-free way to get a nicotine buzz"

I don't vape to get a "buzz", and I never smoked to get a "buzz".

Drewsworld · 04-29-2009, 06:53 PM

I think some one should start a collection to help the cause...or possibly alert the ECA for potential collabrative measures

syntaxevasion · 04-29-2009, 06:55 PM

Wow, I'm actually rooting for the competition...

Blue Knight Max · 04-29-2009, 06:58 PM

For all the rant they got from many of us here on this forum, isn't it Ironic how they were the ones to step up to the plate and actually file a lawsuit?

I'm sure it's to save their business but now is the time for all suppliers to put competition (and their differences) to the side and join forces with Smoking Everywhere in this lawsuit.

United we stand, Divided we fall.

bizzyb0t · 04-29-2009, 06:58 PM

This sue job seems like a mixed bag to me.

On one hand, we have the possibility of it making shipment of our precious e-cigs easier to get into the country... on the other hand if they're aligned with cigarettes, they might end up being taxed like cigarettes and tobacco products.

I'm very annoyed that it seems impossible to separate the devices from the liquid.

Jim Davis · 04-29-2009, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizzyb0t

This sue job seems like a mixed bag to me.

On one hand, we have the possibility of it making shipment of our precious e-cigs easier to get into the country... on the other hand if they're aligned with cigarettes, they might end up being taxed like cigarettes and tobacco products.

They *will* end up being taxed like tobacco products. This isn't a health & safety thing. It's all about the money.

ZambucaLu · 04-29-2009, 07:02 PM

Waiting for Njoy to jump on this bandwagon too, with their attorneys. Unless they're going to wait to see what happens with SE?

Lu

04-29-2009, 06:45 PM	#11
Wildsky ECF Veteran Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Nebraska Posts: 2,224	Best news of the day right here! __________________ Dorothy of Oz Tobacco free since April 26th, 2009

04-29-2009, 06:46 PM	#12
esmok-e Suppliers Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: U$A $ponsoring $upplier (NJ) Posts: 363	While I'm not thrilled with their product or kiosk kooks, I give them a major KUDO on this! SE split from Smoke Fifty One last year so we have that in common... long story for another time. __________________ [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] _{eSmoke - A Breath of Hope For Smokers}

04-29-2009, 06:48 PM	#14
Jim Davis Super Moderator Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Houston, Texas / USA Posts: 3,908 Tweet this post!	Good news! The only thing that I didn't like about the article was "and their makers market them as a risk-free way to get a nicotine buzz" I don't vape to get a "buzz", and I never smoked to get a "buzz". __________________

04-29-2009, 06:53 PM	#15
Drewsworld US Supplier Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: New Jersey Posts: 2,104	I think some one should start a collection to help the cause...or possibly alert the ECA for potential collabrative measures __________________

04-29-2009, 06:55 PM	#16
syntaxevasion USA Supplier Forum Sponsor Join Date: May 2008 Location: Jacksonville, FL Posts: 697	Wow, I'm actually rooting for the competition... __________________ TRUSTY SIDEKICK: V9 NEBULA http://www.vapornine.com

04-29-2009, 06:46 PM	#13
Caesarea ECF Veteran Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: UK Posts: 2,252	I wish them luck. Is the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia a good venue for this?? Being an ignorant Brit I guess that is in Washington DC????? C.

04-29-2009, 06:58 PM	#17
Blue Knight Max Super Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Bay Shore, New York (Long Island) Posts: 479	For all the rant they got from many of us here on this forum, isn't it Ironic how they were the ones to step up to the plate and actually file a lawsuit? I'm sure it's to save their business but now is the time for all suppliers to put competition (and their differences) to the side and join forces with Smoking Everywhere in this lawsuit. United we stand, Divided we fall. __________________ The Blue Knight Real Bikers never get lost.....We go sight seeing

04-29-2009, 06:58 PM	#18
bizzyb0t US Supplier Forum Sponsor Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Denver CO, USA Posts: 704 Blog Entries: 1 Tweet this post!	This sue job seems like a mixed bag to me. On one hand, we have the possibility of it making shipment of our precious e-cigs easier to get into the country... on the other hand if they're aligned with cigarettes, they might end up being taxed like cigarettes and tobacco products. I'm very annoyed that it seems impossible to separate the devices from the liquid. __________________ VaporStuff.com ≡ Will be back ASAP! FRAK YOU Ash.org!

04-29-2009, 07:02 PM	#20
ZambucaLu I SEES ALL! Moderator Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Central NY, USA Posts: 8,081	Waiting for Njoy to jump on this bandwagon too, with their attorneys. Unless they're going to wait to see what happens with SE? Lu __________________ New Suppliers READ THIS THREAD! Last edited by ZambucaLu; 04-29-2009 at 07:05 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode