e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > E-cigarette News
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

E-cigarette News Seen a news story? Feel free to comment on it in here...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2009, 01:02 AM   #1
ckc
Senior Member
 
ckc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 268
Default Cigarette or Drug

Now this is confusing, the next NRT up and coming is a cigarette?

22nd Century Continuing Development Of Its Smoking Cessation Aid

I'd honestly like to know how that will be remotely acceptable.
__________________
Tomorrow Belongs To Me
ckc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 05:37 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
PhiHalcyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 183
Default

I found this to be hilarious. If you want to sell nicotine-free cigarettes, then just do it. If it catches on with people who are trying to quit, and it works for them in this way, then great. People who are trying to quit would obviously have good reason to be attracted to such a cigarette without you explicitly telling them that it is a smoking cessation aid.

The cigarette that insisted on being a drug. Too funny.
PhiHalcyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 09:50 AM   #3
ckc
Senior Member
 
ckc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 268
Default

What really got my noodle was all the Anti-Smoking peeps that push approved NRT. This is really going to be a spanner in their works. Surely if it still contains tobacco its not good for you and even worse than our E-Cigs yet it's going through approval.

The first official FDA Approved Cig.I wonder if its fire safe.
__________________
Tomorrow Belongs To Me
ckc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 02:36 PM   #4
US Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
halopunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ohio (by Pittsburgh/Weirton)
Posts: 1,352
Default

I'm confused on this whole thing...thought they already made these...you could find them at rite aid and were called 'Quest'. And believe me, just the taste of those cigarette's were enough to make me want to quit. I had trouble even getting through an entire cigarette, but maybe that is how it works.
__________________
AltSmoke.com | Mod Shop Now Open|
News: BB Preorder has Started! | New Item - Adapters!
halopunker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 02:44 PM   #5
ECF Veteran
 
Angela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posts: 1,171
Default

Hmmmmmm..... now that most people believe the introduction of 'lights' was a mistake, lets create the ultra ultra ultra light by taking out the majority of just about the least harmful part of a cigarette and leaving in all the stuff that causes the health problems! Yeah right.

Well, with the criteria of NRT (ie to treat the 'disease' of nicotine adiction) it will probably pass! It may very well treat that disease.... won't do much else to help people's health though, will it?
__________________


Angela is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 02:47 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Nestran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 241
Default

Well I only got through half the article because I have a weak stomach but from what I can see is that they found a 47% quit rate at 6 weeks with a combination of the no nic cigs and NRT lozenges.

Soo, quit what? They are combusting tobacco and sucking on nicotine lol.

No harm reduction at all, they just separated them. I want to see the success rates after they stop the lozenge or stop smoking the cig for a few weeks.

Now granted, I am still using nic and simulating the smoking experience but I am not harming others and there is harm reduction for me.

these cigs are stupid lol.

Nestran
Nestran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 03:11 PM   #7
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

Interesting. So these cigarettes as NRT's are still going to burn? Isn't it the burning that is harmful?

Wow. There are SO many implications to this and routes this could go... I kind of fear for the FDA "approving" this cigarette. It opens the door for many tobacco cigarettes being FDA approved.

22nd Century Ltd., LLC - Technology Here's more on the actual product idea from the company
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 03:36 PM   #8
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

Halopunker is right. Quest was a step-down system to zero nic, provided by tobacco especially grown by the Amish (since Big Tobacco put the clamps on any other farming of such a product). It's a great story, BTW.

But a smoker gets all of the damaging tars and their carcinogens and none of the nicotine addiction satisfaction. I used all three Quest products and fell apart when the nicotine was removed or diminished. My case might be unique to me -- but it did NOT work. Neither will these silly cigs.

What a waste of effort when a better solution is at hand. Trouble is, e-smoking isn't promising great riches to companies that sit down for dinner with influential groups or legislators.

In fact, e-smoking threatens those very companies. So it must be stopped.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 07:13 PM   #9
Super Member
 
Vocalek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 606
Default

I love this part:
Quote:
VLN cigarettes have potential to significantly increase smoking cessation by encouraging more smokers to attempt quitting with a more acceptable and familiar product. Since potential quitters are already smokers, VLN cigarettes do not expose patients to any new compounds and do not introduce any new side effects.
See, that's where SE went astray. They should have stated "...do not expose the user to any NEW carcinogens".
__________________
Vocalek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 07:50 PM   #10
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vocalek View Post
I love this part:


See, that's where SE went astray. They should have stated "...do not expose the user to any NEW carcinogens".
I am sure it was mentioned in their arguments. I believe the FDA testing/report showed this as well...
lkim65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184