e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > E-cigarette News
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

E-cigarette News Seen a news story? Feel free to comment on it in here...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2009, 02:45 AM   #11
Full Member
 
nyabzns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Virginia , USA
Posts: 132
Default

I might sound like an idiot but I have a thought. I had read the Phillip Morris had lowered there prices on cigarettes in conjunction with some of the government tax hikes to keep prices down to a reasonable level.

Perhaps a purchase of the company and it's patents would allow them to use the tobacco to extract the nicotine, make a US based E-Juice and market an E-cig of there own. At the same time they have the means to fight the FDA regulation if indeed the regulation is strictly for tobacco products.

In the end it could result in wider availability and recognition of e-cigs.

With the New FDA regulations I wouldn't understand a tobacco companies desire to eliminate e-cigarettes when they themselves are being regulated out of existence already. Eliminating e-cigarette "competition" wouldn't necessarily make them more money if a reasonable number of people are forced to quit smoking because they can't afford it or the FDA regulates the nicotine levels in analogs.

Last edited by nyabzns; 11-05-2009 at 02:46 AM. Reason: Spelling errors
nyabzns is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:56 AM   #12
Full Member
 
windpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 52
Default

As far as I can see RUYAN does not hold a single US patent:

Patents - RUYAN Electronic Cigarette Offical International Website ? Beijing SBT Ruyan Technology & Development Co., Ltd.

And even if they did inelectual property law is very difficult to enforce. They defiantly did not invent the atomizer, the battery, PG, the heating coils, the "wool" batting, nicotine, the "cigarette look" etc...

There are documented research trials from the 1940's of vaporizing and inhaling PG, was RUYAN selling e-cigs in the 40s?

Frankly several manfacturers/distributors (including US ones) are falsely claiming patents they do not have and will likely never get.

If RUYAN holds a US patent what is the patent number, control number, or PCT number?
windpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:03 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 167
Default

Hon, Lik (of Ruyan) filed at least 2 applications - you can see them here; http://www.google.com/patents?q=Hon+...Search+Patents

and another- this one actually appears to be granted;

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=%22hon+lik%22

In 2007 they sued NJoy

Philip Morris already had a patent issued on electronic smoking devices in 1997;

http://www.google.com/patents/about?...onic+Cigarette

Last edited by IANAN; 11-05-2009 at 03:28 AM. Reason: Just link to the applications
IANAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:18 AM   #14
Full Member
 
windpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 52
Default

PM's patent states:

Quote:
A stand for an electrically heated cigarette smoking device can removably support an electrically heated cigarette smoking device, which includes a rechargeable power supply.
No idea what that is....

RUYAN's is still an application, not approved, and very vague...

If anything it would only cover a specific 3 piece design.

Aside from that if you ask any intellectual properties lawyer having a patent or trademark is one thing, having an enforcable one is something else completely, and enforcing it is a whole different game altogether...
windpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:28 AM   #15
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

A potentially huge story.

Now, if I was RuYan I'd say no to all buyouts, because the only benefit would be short-term (tempting of course). I would guess this is a licensing deal.
__________________
Link: Vaping Buzzz : Article Base & FAQ ... *New Design
kinabaloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:36 AM   #16
Ride or Die Member
 
bikergirl1908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 240
Default

BT is all about money...and the FDA is in their pocket.

If BT is negotiating to get into the e-cig ball game, I think it's so they can cash in on the electronic aspect of nicotine addiction and add to their already astronomical analog profit margin.

Imagine a day when you can go to your local store and purchase a carton of Marlboro analogs as well as a carton of Marlboro branded cartridges or ejuice in varying mg strengths.

Whoever controls the regulation controls the money and vice versa.

Just my .02.
__________________
The world is full of willing people, some willing to work, the rest willing to let them.
--Robert Frost
bikergirl1908 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:44 AM   #17
A Misspelling Member
 
liscab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami fl.
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyJoe View Post
Please edit with link to original source and limit the number of paragraphs to two as per: About linking to news stories - Read before you post!
Are yuo this guy scrol to Javier
Vapeando.com • Ver Tema - PEG 400. ¿El último disolvente?
__________________


liscab is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:47 AM   #18
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bikergirl1908 View Post
BT is all about money...and the FDA is in their pocket.

If BT is negotiating to get into the e-cig ball game, I think it's so they can cash in on the electronic aspect of nicotine addiction and add to their already astronomical analog profit margin.

Imagine a day when you can go to your local store and purchase a carton of Marlboro analogs as well as a carton of Marlboro branded cartridges or ejuice in varying mg strengths.

Whoever controls the regulation controls the money and vice versa.

Just my .02.
I'm no fan of Big Tobacco, but where is the money really going? It seems to me that it's the taxes that have made cigarettes so expensive, not the product itself.

My worry is that the government will slap an enormous "sin tax" on e-cigs and juice. The more popular e-cigs become, the more likely it is that both BT and the government will want their cut - especially when they start to see tax revenues dry up as smokers turn instead to vaping.

Anyone who *really* believes that taxes on tobacco products are all about public health is mistaken, in my opinion. Now more than ever, it's about the money, which brings me back to my original point. BT is not seeing huge profits like federal and state governments are. They can tax smokers to death without a peep of protest from the non-smoking majority.
VapingRulz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:52 AM   #19
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 830
Default

It's not BT making all the money...it's the government.

Here is a breakdown of a pack of smokes in my State and where the funds are going. Keep in mind that our State and Federal government is BROKE!

My smokes cost: $4.50 Per pack

State excise tax: $1.25
Fed Tax: $1.01
MSA Trust: $ .84 (4.2 cents per cigarette sold)
Sales Tax: $ .34 (7.5%)
---------
Total Tax: $3.44

Ciggies cost: $4.50 minus tax to state and feds of $3.44 leaves $1.06 for the tobacco companies. Please keep in mind I have not included the retail mark-up in the above numbers and therefore the tobacco companies are making less than a dollar per pack. It's the State and Federal Government that are making the big bucks from tobacco smokers.

Therefore, a safe prediction for the treatment of the e-cig would be the government regulating heavy taxation via the cost of the e-cig to fund a campaign against your ability to purchase and use an e-cig.

It's a shell game...follow the dollars and the government wins.
ladyraj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:55 AM   #20
Supplier pending approval
 
ECGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
PM could become our biggest friend.
PM is no ones friend! LOL, and don't expect any licensing agreements. With PM and all of Big Tobacco, it's their show or no show at all. They already have the distribution network in place. They don't need any of the current manufacturers, distributors or retailers / affiliates. Trying to work with them would be more a hinderance then a help.

My gut tells me they want the technology. Its part of the major corp mentality, see a competitor, buy them up. And there are lots of reasons for them to buy Ruyan.

Quote:
Aside from that if you ask any intellectual properties lawyer having a patent or trademark is one thing, having an enforcable one is something else completely, and enforcing it is a whole different game altogether...
Yes, but patents are fought for in court. What e-cig manufaturer or company has the money to fight big tobacco? To them the legal costs would be lunch, their army of lawyers could bury anyone in the industry at this time in paperwork and discovery and legal fees without breaking a sweat.
__________________
E-Cig Guy Electronic Cigarette Spot

Last edited by ECGuy; 11-05-2009 at 05:00 AM. Reason: added response rather than double posting
ECGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184