e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > E-cigarette News
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

E-cigarette News Seen a news story? Feel free to comment on it in here...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2009, 11:04 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
halfevildruid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Saint George, Utah
Posts: 294
Default phillip morris/ruyan negotiations?

OfficialWire: Philip Morris In Negotiations With Original E-Cigarette Company
halfevildruid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 01:55 PM   #2
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

ecigarettesnational sure did hit the big one with this marketing piece!

Their website traffic must be up 500%!
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:04 PM   #3
Super Member
 
doots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,127
Default

might not be a bad thing as PM ha the money for testing to prove or not that ecigs are not bad for you!
doots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 03:22 PM   #4
Full Member
 
Ionredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maryland,U.S.A.
Posts: 61
Default

But it also means prices and taxes on them will go through the roof.You know PM will try to shut down all competitive e-cig manufacturers also.They will get their foot in the door and then corner the market as they have done with analogs.
Ionredline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 03:32 PM   #5
Full Member
 
Fodder4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Colony, Texas
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ionredline View Post
But it also means prices and taxes on them will go through the roof.You know PM will try to shut down all competitive e-cig manufacturers also.They will get their foot in the door and then corner the market as they have done with analogs.
True but it was bound to happen sooner or later as e-cigs got more popular.
Fodder4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 03:34 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
jerrydon10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: --Missouri--Ozark Mountains, USA
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ionredline View Post
But it also means prices and taxes on them will go through the roof.You know PM will try to shut down all competitive e-cig manufacturers also.They will get their foot in the door and then corner the market as they have done with analogs.
Or they might just stop producing them to get us back on analogs. In any of these scenarios guess who loses: us.
jerrydon10 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 03:35 PM   #7
Full Member
 
Ionredline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maryland,U.S.A.
Posts: 61
Default

Of course, Ruyan is not stupid.They exist to make money like any company.Combining with PM is a good way to that end and nobody can argue that fact.
Ionredline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 04:59 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Vaporista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 153
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Well PM is up to new strategy. They just bought out Swedish Match LTD South Africa (subject to competition commission approvals the sale should be final soon). Swedish match Sweden owns the General Snus brand and Cohiba brands. Swedish Match SA owns several mass market cheap roll your own tobacco brands including Boxer. I think that since 95% of the South African tobacco market is controlled by British American Tobacco Company this is a strategic move by PM to join forces with the Swedish Match Mothership and enter the smokeless products market. Someone mentioned somwhere I think it was a snus blog that PM was possibly exploring an exclusive Cohiba branded snus in anticipation of the Cuban embargo falling away soon. They would be exploring the e-cig. It fits in with their new strategy and if the e-cig doesn't work they will always have their snus.
__________________


I have spent a fortune on e-cigs, liquids and accessories.I have not saved a penny yet.
Vaporista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 05:02 PM   #9
Executive Director
Smokefree Pennsylvania
Tobaccofree.org
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 123
Default

There could be huge public health benefits worldwide if PMI buys Ruyan or its e-cigarette patents (as PMI has contracts with hundreds of thousands of retailers, and has could place the products alongside Marlboro cigarettes in most favorable store locations). PMI also has badly needed lobbying clout to oppose e-cigarette bans, unwarranted regulations and taxes.

The potential downside is that PMI likely would aggressively litigate against other e-cigarette manufacturers/vendors claiming patent infringement. Unlike Ruyan (which has settled patent infringement cases for relatively small amounts of money), PMI has a lot more lawyers and a lot more money.

It is important to note that PMI does not operate in the US, nor does Ruyan Group, as both operate abroad. Rather PM USA and Ruyan America operate in America.

I've also heard that there's an ongoing struggle between Ruyan Group and Ruyan America (which could be related to the reported negotiations with PMI).

Regarding taxation of e-cigarettes, any effort to impose excise taxes on e-cigarettes provides another opportunity to educate elected officials of the comparable health risks and benefits of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Smokefree Pennsylvania has been advocating significantly lower excise taxes for smokeless tobacco products than for cigarettes (because similar to e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco is far far less hazardous than cigarettes). PA is the only state that doesn't tax smokeless tobacco products.

We'd do the same if/when e-cigarettes are regulated as tobacco product, and if/when CTFK, ACS, AHA, ALA would campaign for high taxes on e-cigarettes (as they've been advocating the same tax rate for smokeless tobacco as for cigarettes).
Bill Godshall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 05:24 PM   #10
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Godshall View Post
There could be huge public health benefits worldwide if PMI buys Ruyan or its e-cigarette patents (as PMI has contracts with hundreds of thousands of retailers, and has could place the products alongside Marlboro cigarettes in most favorable store locations). PMI also has badly needed lobbying clout to oppose e-cigarette bans, unwarranted regulations and taxes.

The potential downside is that PMI likely would aggressively litigate against other e-cigarette manufacturers/vendors claiming patent infringement. Unlike Ruyan (which has settled patent infringement cases for relatively small amounts of money), PMI has a lot more lawyers and a lot more money.

It is important to note that PMI does not operate in the US, nor does Ruyan Group, as both operate abroad. Rather PM USA and Ruyan America operate in America.

I've also heard that there's an ongoing struggle between Ruyan Group and Ruyan America (which could be related to the reported negotiations with PMI).

Regarding taxation of e-cigarettes, any effort to impose excise taxes on e-cigarettes provides another opportunity to educate elected officials of the comparable health risks and benefits of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Smokefree Pennsylvania has been advocating significantly lower excise taxes for smokeless tobacco products than for cigarettes (because similar to e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco is far far less hazardous than cigarettes). PA is the only state that doesn't tax smokeless tobacco products.

We'd do the same if/when e-cigarettes are regulated as tobacco product, and if/when CTFK, ACS, AHA, ALA would campaign for high taxes on e-cigarettes (as they've been advocating the same tax rate for smokeless tobacco as for cigarettes).
Bill - So what is your take on the idea that PMI is lobbying the European Union to regulate the electronic cigarette as an NRT?
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184