e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > E-cigarette News
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

E-cigarette News Seen a news story? Feel free to comment on it in here...

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2009, 05:12 AM   #41
Full Member
 
Riffmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikenmoke View Post
Or maybe this is the workings of our Big Tobacco buddies..WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO STOP THIS...I see posts on here that has been viewed more than 22,000 times on one single thread..How many members do we actually have World-wide on this forum alone??? Surely with our outstanding numbers we can do something about this bull*****.
Being pollution free, harmless and odorless to others and the environment, containing only 3 main ingredients of 4,000 to a regular cigarette. We can have so many pressing arguments and key elements to stop electronic cigarettes from being illegal. WE NEED TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD!
Amen to that......HK has just banned it .....me and my buddies have to go underground.....to have an ecig....thats so fxxked up. I think the penalty is worst than being caught with a joint.
Lets bring some ideas to the table.....whining aint gonna help....
Eciggers Unite !
Riffmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:16 AM   #42
Manufacturer
 
secondson2929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Posts: 150
Default

If it is big tobacco they're just plain stupid. Just think how much money there is to be made with an addictive substance like nicotine that is delivered in a less dangerous way.
secondson2929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:18 AM   #43
Supporting Member
 
Tolken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by secondson2929 View Post
If it is big tobacco they're just plain stupid. Just think how much money there is to be made with an addictive substance like nicotine that is delivered in a less dangerous way.
Yeah, why don't they just buy/lease the patent?
Tolken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:25 AM   #44
Full Member
 
MODEL77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 22
Default

It seems many countries are just banning them with out a second thought. Is there no option to begin regulating them? I would actually feel better if the liquid was more quality assured. Some times it's hard to know if it is factory made or just basement made with loranne candy flavoring.

It crazy to just say no to such a viable and marketable product though.
MODEL77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:26 AM   #45
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tolken View Post
Yeah, why don't they just buy/lease the patent?
Why dont they just F off they have had 50 -60-70 years out of smokers your product destroys life's ...finished end off FINITO ...to Miss Chen in the comfortable shoes....you need a f'ing reality check. I am not hurting anyone and im not pretending to smoke its just this thing i have is far more pleasant than chewing a bit of crappy gum all day, ps unlike gum i dont drop it on the sidewalk.

Lol it will end up like peeps at my work, im in the auto business and half my buds smoke weed and you know when the weed guy arrives lol....i will be like OMG when is the E liq dude coming to fix me up.
__________________


nosmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:26 AM   #46
Supporting Member
 
Tolken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 75
Default

This is making me chain vape
Tolken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:27 AM   #47
Full Member
 
mawic5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Michigan,USA
Posts: 12
Default

NG NG NG NG why not just market them as an " herbal" alternative to smoking? """The FDA claims that they can only regulate things which fall under the two categories, namely foods and drugs. According to the Food and Drug Act passed in 1906 and 1938, all food additives and drugs should be approved by the FDA before they can be sold in the market. They all need to submit evidences about their health claims or how they can cure an ailment or condition, before they can be legally sold to the public.

Herbal remedies, which are classified under dietary supplements, are composed of processed or unprocessed elements such as plant barks, extracts and essential oils. Since they are considered as dietary supplements, they are not regulated by the FDA like drugs or prescription medications.

They are more likely classified and regulated as food, which helps make it easier for herbal remedies to be sold in the market since there are fewer restrictions in terms of their approval. Unfortunately, since these herbal remedies make health and disease claims, there have been discrepancies as to where they are going to be classified, and how they are going to be regulated.

According to recent debates, FDA do not approve herbal remedies due to the fact that it cannot clearly define the line that separates structure and function claims over disease and health claims. If the line was clearly defined, then herbal remedies would have been easier to regulate. Herbal remedies, which fall under dietary supplements, are not clearly defined and separated from foods. This makes it difficult for the FDA to implement its regulations since it cannot clearly categorize the herbal remedies as to whether it falls under foods or drugs.

One incident that further helped blur the lines in categorizing herbal remedies as foods is when different food companies started making health claims themselves. If this was the case, then these foods should be regulated as drugs. Due to this turn of events, the FDA is now finding it very difficult to further scrutinize the difference on how foods and the dietary supplements should be categorized and regulated. """
mawic5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:28 AM   #48
Debonair Elitist
 
Flitzanu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,041
Default

this is what happens if you don't smoke.

duh.

__________________

www.myspace.com/flitzanu
Flitzanu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:29 AM   #49
Full Member
 
MisterPuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, Ok. U.S.A
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tolken View Post
This is making me chain vape

Making me stock up. I now have 3 different orders for juice in varying stages of shipping.

Puck is scared at the mere thought of not being able to get more turkish blend/camel
__________________
MisterPuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:33 AM   #50
ECF Elite Veteran
 
The Wiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Emerald City,Oz
Posts: 3,169
Default

Seem's like I missed alot while at work today! Terrible news.........Think I will vape like crazy tonight! The Wiz!
__________________
"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain"
The Wiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
bans, fda, regulation, usa

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/e-cigarette-news/8264-fda-crackdown-looms.html
Posted By For Type Date
Amerika de volgende in de rij? This thread Refback 04-25-2009 02:50 AM
Legal interpretation of the FDA letter This thread Refback 03-11-2009 12:52 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184