e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > E-cigarette News
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

E-cigarette News Seen a news story? Feel free to comment on it in here...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2009, 09:32 PM   #21
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,050
Default

KatyS, you're a reseller, not a manufacturer. Product responsibilities should reside above your level. I don't think anyone faults you or the other resellers for not ponying up big money to have your items tested. Your product investment was on faith, as is ours; a maker of devices should never rely on that alone. THEY are to blame if the gavel bangs this trial to an end.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 09:41 PM   #22
Super Member
 
Faethe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 363
Blog Entries: 4
Default

We can import cigarettes in the US. Actually, I know of no restriction on the importation of nicotine products. I still think this is a labeling issue for the most part.

As for Australia doing stupid things on impulse. Yes. Yes they do. Then the people get all pissed off and make a huge amount of noise, and then it goes away. I'm a dual citizen with the US and Oz and planning on moving to New Zealand. The noise level is much more friendly. It's also much easier to point out when the government does stupid things. Here in the US - it's not stupid things. It's terrifying things, and I do not see that stopping.
__________________


Faethe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 09:44 PM   #23
Super Member
 
Faethe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 363
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
KatyS, you're a reseller, not a manufacturer. Product responsibilities should reside above your level. I don't think anyone faults you or the other resellers for not ponying up big money to have your items tested. Your product investment was on faith, as is ours; a maker of devices should never rely on that alone. THEY are to blame if the gavel bangs this trial to an end.
Ruyan or Janty or someone with much to loose will inevitably pay up on the bribes. Johnson Creek has already made overtures towards the FDA. The have a certificate on their site now. We don't know whether the manufacturers do have things in testing. Why would they tell anyone? Business in China, from what I understand, is mad competitive. Whomever gets to the finish line first will likely use that as a hammer to disprove their competition's validity.
__________________


Faethe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 09:48 PM   #24
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,050
Default

Quote:
Ruyan or Janty or someone with much to loose will inevitably pay up on the bribes.
THAT is exactly the kind of statement that dooms e-smoking. Exactly. End of patience with this kind of nonsense ... A radical segment will kill the practice. What hope is left with postings like that for the FDA to read?
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 09:52 PM   #25
Supporting Member
 
ed_bollix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Royal Oak, Michigan usa
Posts: 353
Default

If it makes any difference I was able to purchase Absinthe from Eastern Europe and have it shipped to the US during the ban. The thought was that it wasn't illegal to use, just buy or sell in this country. I may have that wrong but I did enjoy my Absinthe.
__________________


ed_bollix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:06 PM   #26
ECF Veteran
 
Heed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dasein
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
THAT is exactly the kind of statement that dooms e-smoking. Exactly. End of patience with this kind of nonsense ... A radical segment will kill the practice. What hope is left with postings like that for the FDA to read?
Huh?

One comment on a forum left for "the FDA to read" has doomed e-smoking?

If one off-hand comment on a forum holds the balance for the FDA, then that's when there really is no hope -- because that means the FDA aren't bothered with investigating the issue at all and will decide based upon something equivalent to a shoolyard name calling incident.

FDA Bob: "Those nasty e-smokers insinuated on an internet forum that we are on the take!"

FDA Ted: "Oh well, I was going to pass this stuff, but now that you've showed me that -- BAN!!"

Seriously, while I can understand wanting to be careful with wording when advertising and selling the products (i.e. no health/cessation claims, etc.) I find it hard to fathom that comments on a forum are going to be the doom for e-smoking.
__________________
I vape, therefore I am

...a non-smoker.

Last edited by Heed; 03-12-2009 at 10:53 PM.
Heed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:08 PM   #27
Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Apple Valley, MN
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faethe View Post
We can import cigarettes in the US. Actually, I know of no restriction on the importation of nicotine products. I still think this is a labeling issue for the most part.
Congress recently passed legislation that gives the FDA regulatory authority over nicotine. I dont know the specifics, but it can't be good.
ChadmanMn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:26 PM   #28
Super Member
 
Faethe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 363
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
THAT is exactly the kind of statement that dooms e-smoking. Exactly. End of patience with this kind of nonsense ... A radical segment will kill the practice. What hope is left with postings like that for the FDA to read?
I don't see how anyone is going to kill the process? Are you saying that the FDA had no business with E cigs? I agree with you. But I rather doubt that will be the case. I hope it is. But if it is not, then my scenario may be what happens. I have confidence that this will sort itself out. Too much money in it to get swept under the rug, for sure.
__________________


Faethe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:28 PM   #29
Super Member
 
Faethe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 363
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChadmanMn View Post
Congress recently passed legislation that gives the FDA regulatory authority over nicotine. I dont know the specifics, but it can't be good.
The only thing I can think of is that it would take a terrific amount of money for the FDA to do anything at this point. I don't think this will be acted on, tbh.
__________________


Faethe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:37 PM   #30
Moderator
 
Sun Vaporer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,486
Post "Stop the Nonsense" --well put Tropical Bob

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faethe View Post
Ruyan or Janty or someone with much to loose will inevitably pay up on the bribes..
This statement is in fact plain nonsense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
THAT is exactly the kind of statement that dooms e-smoking. Exactly. End of patience with this kind of nonsense ... A radical segment will kill the practice. What hope is left with postings like that for the FDA to read?

Exactly TB---That kind of nonsense has NO Legitimate Office here–and is just plan ridiculous. Stick with the facts as we know them and as they come forward—Sun
Sun Vaporer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
bans, fda, regulation, usa

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183