e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Buying & Selling > E Cigarette Suppliers Forum

E Cigarette Suppliers Forum Info from suppliers on their products.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2008, 05:25 PM   #31
Super Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFan View Post
Guys, who had that great idea for using an egg-cup?
Anyway, it was a terrific idea, laura! Get an egg cup (or some shallow confined basin) and just rest the blank in the cup (wool side down). The wool will then draw up exactly as much liquid as it can handle.



sanneke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 06:21 PM   #32
Full Member
 
mocart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vafvaf View Post
Hi MacFan, is there the possibilities to send sample pack(VG) to EU. As i see Electronic Cigarette | Free Yourself... | e-cigs Welcome don’t have it yet, but i like to try different flavors before start buying, can you post to EU? thanx
I asked MacFan similar quote (to ship to EU) but unfortunately we have to buy JC liquids only from e-cig...
I don't see any option for PG and non-PG versions on e-cig site, are they selling non-PG versions at all?
mocart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 03:26 AM   #33
Supporting Member
 
leaford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 1,757
Default

Smokester answered that in another thread. It will come but not in the first relaease.
__________________
Sadly, we live in a society where education is equated with elitism, and ignorance is equated with authenticity.
leaford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 06:05 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe/ Slo
Posts: 234
Default

hi MacFan

have you seen this?
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...l-warning.html
some comment?
is non PG version of JC is a VG version?
whoud be good to have yours comments on this subject on forum as we already start ordering Non PG versions.
vafvaf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 01:29 AM   #35
Supplier
 
MacFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vafvaf View Post
hi MacFan

have you seen this?
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...l-warning.html
some comment?
is non PG version of JC is a VG version?
whoud be good to have yours comments on this subject on forum as we already start ordering Non PG versions.
Howdy gang! Yep I saw this post and we quickly turned to the company that did our nicotine and safety testing, Dynalene. They are going to do a report on a sample we're sending them but I spoke to our rep who conveyed to me that her understanding was that to produce acrolein, an industrial-grade glycerol would have to be heated in a very specific conditions to a temperature much higher than 280c in order to decompose into acrolein.
Regardless, we will be investigating further and will post our findings on this and if we find that there is even one iota of a possibility of danger, we will very quickly remove the NPG versions of our flavors.
Finally I would mention what we do know: food-grade vegetable glycerin is used every day in literally thousands of recipes (mostly desserts and sauces). For example, it is commonly used in making Teriyaki Sauce which in its making is heated to very high temperatures.
To be very clear, I am not at all trying to totally justify the use of it if it turns out to be potentially harmful. However, until we know more, I do want to point out that it is a compound made from coconut or palm oil that we've been ingesting for many many years (after having been cooked at high temps).
We'll all continue to keep up on this though and report all of our findings
__________________
www.JohnsonCreekSmokeJuice.com
"Quality, Purity, Sheer Enjoyment"
MacFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 01:47 AM   #36
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,302
Default

Mac- Very cool- You and others are truly the pioneers by doign hte testings needed to ensure safety and get htese products rolling. A HUGE thank you from us all!
Nazareth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 02:13 AM   #37
Full Member
 
Jag1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: US-FL
Posts: 92
Default

I just got today my first 2 bottles of juice from Johnson Creek! Regular low and Tennesse Cured Low! That made my day! I sampled ASAP both and I am in e-smokers heaven! The Tennesse Cured will probably be my standard smoke and the regular the in between!
Jag1313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 03:30 AM   #38
Full Member
 
stevoG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 112
Default

I just got my bottle of VG artic mint from JC and tried it all day. It really didnt do much for me. You cant tell your smoking it at all really. My carts i get are menthol and i can really feel them. Maybe the PG version would of done that. Plus im pretty sure it killed my atomizer. Would the PG version give you more of a throat hit?
stevoG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 04:04 PM   #39
Supplier
 
MacFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 184
Default

Howdy gang! I just wanted to take a moment to address the important issue of atomizers. We have filled a very large number of orders since the end of July and have heard from literally hundreds of people how much they love their Johnson Creek Smoke Juice. And we are so proud to be able to bring an alternative to the liquid we had been forced to accept before. And indeed there were a small number of customers who felt that their atomizers were damaged by our smoke. This was something we take (and took) very seriously and I think if you asked those we spoke to, they'd likely tell you that we didn't shirk or minimize their claims, but rather spoke to them honestly and in a straight-forward manner.
We also wanted to point out that in all of the trials we conducted, not a single atomizer failed except for one. And these were two-week trials with as many different atomizers as we could find. In addition, my own atomizers (and believe me, I vape pretty much constantly) have yet to experience any degradation or failure.
The only time one of our trials caused an atomizer to fail, was when we smoked normally but dripped directly onto the atomizer (as opposed to in the cartridge) for a period of six days. However, we would note that most companies (including Janty) do not recommend that you drip onto the atomizer but rather only drip onto the cartridge. Doing so will indeed damage any atomizer. Now, Im sure that those who's atomizers were damaged didn't drip onto the atomizer as most everyone is aware of the risk of doing this. And this is why we took this so seriously and indeed those we did hear this from, we spoke to them about it in a very upfront and straightforward manner as I we always do.
Of course, none of this matters to the person who believes their atomizer was affected. And we are not interested in taking chances where our customers are concerned. Indeed, I think most of you know how important the views of my customers are to me. Therefore two weeks ago, on the chance that there was something we overlooked and to ensure that our customers remain the happiest in the industry, we spent quite a bit of time, energy and money to purchase and install a very sophisticated filtering system that removes any particulates, oils, or residue. Now, every single batch is run through the system and frankly I would be flabbergasted to find that our smoke juice clogged or damaged anything.
So, honest and straightforward communication is what we pride ourselves on and is how we will continue to conduct ourselves. We would simply ask that, especially now, those who believe their atomizers to have been damaged give it more than a few hours of use before claiming that our smoke juice was responsible for the atomizers' demise.
Finally, I am so excited about the new flavors and recipes we have coming up and as many of you know, feel incredibly honored to be able to bring you products that I myself love using. This is an exciting and often perilous time in a brand-new industry. And like all new things, we will experience new discoveries, better methods, breakthrough moments, set-backs, surprises, and yes growing pains. But in the end, the result will be so worth it!






Quote:
Originally Posted by stevoG View Post
I just got my bottle of VG artic mint from JC and tried it all day. It really didnt do much for me. You cant tell your smoking it at all really. My carts i get are menthol and i can really feel them. Maybe the PG version would of done that. Plus im pretty sure it killed my atomizer. Would the PG version give you more of a throat hit?
__________________
www.JohnsonCreekSmokeJuice.com
"Quality, Purity, Sheer Enjoyment"
MacFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 04:12 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
icemanmaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.K. Halifax West Yorkshire
Posts: 296
Default

I have had no problem with my atomizer.
Janty has put up a list of whats in their juice I stuck my neck out and said I bet you dont put as much stuff in yours. Check out the thread.
Am I wrong or right I have tried both and I am sure I am right.
I would say yours seems more naturale.
__________________
The ice is melting too much nicotine
icemanmaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2008


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28