johnson creek juice test by knutselpeter

[sanneke]

9 augustus 2008, 20:55 #10 knutselpeter
Super Moderator



Lid sinds: 20 december 2007
Berichten: 2.386
Blog Publicaties: 1


Johnson Creek (USA/UK) Liquid residu test
Zoals beloofd ook van deze Liquid (natuurlijk) een residu testje.
As promised a test of the residue of this liquid

De fabrikant geeft op de website aan dat:
The manufacture says this on his website:
(vrij vertaald) (freely translated)

Citaat:
Ook al is de Liquid wat troebel, dit kan geen kwaad voor de atomizer omdat de deeltjes zo klein zijn dat ze meeverdampen.
Even tough the liquid is a little cloudy, it will not hurt the atomizer because the particles are so small they will vaporize.

Net zoals met de andere Liquid residu testen heb ik van deze Liquid een halve ml genomen en rustig op matig vuur laten verdampen.
Just like the other "liquid residue testing" I took a half ml and I vaporised it at a low heat

Opvallend tijdens dit "proefje":
Noticable during this "test":

• De Liquid had minder snel de nijging tot spontane ontbranding t.o.v. andere Liquids
• De geur was zeer afwijkend t.o.v. alle andere proefjes. De damp die vrijkwam was minder scherp en leek meer op een kook/bak luchtje waarbij ik steeds aan popcorn moest denken. (zonnebloem olie?)
• The Liquid is less to spontaneous ignition compared to other Liquids.
• The smell was very different compared to other tests. The vapour was less strong and smelled more like a cooking/baking odor, I was thinking of popcorn. (sunflower oil?)

Dat de fijne deeltjes niet vanzelf meeverdampen is te zien op de foto.

De bovenste lepel is een ongebruikte, de onderste lepel hat resultaat na verdamping van een halve ml.
The smaller particles do not vaporise as you can see in the picture.
The spoon above is a clean one, the bottom spoon is the result after vaporising half a ml.

Onder stromend water was een deel weg te vegen met een vinger, de rest moest met behulp van een stugge afwasborstel schoongemaakt worden.
While holding under water, I was able to wash part away with using my finger, for the rest I needed a scrubbing brush.

klik voor vergroting

Johnson Creek (USA/UK) Liquid - FreE-Smokers

__________________

[dc2k08]

sanneke, does he say how he vaped from the spoon? did he hold a flame beneath it for the test? has he tested other liquids in a similar fashion with similar results or no? btw, thanks for the translation.

[sanneke]

Ampul Liquid proef - FreE-Smokers

scroll down and there's a little video how he does it.

On that same link he did a test with the bickford juice......no residue what so ever, he was amazed.....

You can see it when you scroll down a little more.

[dc2k08]

it is certainly interesting, i guess reports from long-time users' atomizers will tell if this is a fair test or not. this is the link i am following Ampul Liquid proef - FreE-Smokers. is that the correct one?

does he have a pic/video for another brand of e-liquid? i would love to see a comparison. wondering what the implications of this are on a user's health now though perhaps the mixture is heated so fast, it drastically alters the components.

[sanneke]

Yes on that link he's testing 5 different liquids:
e-cig, ss (super smoker), janty (janty tobacco) , ps (party smoker) and sadan (sedansa).

Then later on Johnson creek.

[dc2k08]

thanks, my lack of dutch utterly failed me, even though some of the words are pop-out. i heard recently norwegian is the easiest north european language to learn and acts as a good bridge to learn others of the same vein.

so it seems most of them act similarly apart from ruyan which stands out as leaving very little residue.

[sanneke]

Dutch is hard to learn.

[Nazareth]

Not crazy abotu how htose tests are done- the flame itself causes crud- would be better I think to put the liquid in beaker that protects it from flame. As well, the temperature is fluctuating, goign way above what an atomizer vaporizes at, as witnessed by hte liquid catchign on fire at one point. Need a controlled heating that won't exceed an atomizer temperature, plus, need to atomize the liquid before vaporizing it, to more fully replicate what goes on in Eciggs-

[RatInDaHat]

so i wonder if running it through a finer filter would fix the issues? or is it carbon buildup from sugars?

-Dusty-

[MacFan]

Well, I don't think it would be appropriate for me to go into too much length on this thread, but suffice it to say that I see several flaws with this test. I do wish to make clear that I have quite alot of respect for knutselpeter's past reviews and as such am a bit surprised at some of the statements (above) and procedures used in this review. Indeed, we would never sell a product that actually contained this degree of sediment. Ill leave it at that and close with knutselpeter's statement on our Smoke Juice as of last week:
"First impression of the Johnson Creek Original Tobacco (11mg) Indeed it gives lots of visible vapour. I tested it in a Janty KISS Cigarette en added JC on a original (empty) Cartridge. Very soon I noticed even more visible vapour en the taste was very cigarette like."