e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > ECA
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

ECA Electronic Cigarette Association

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2009, 06:36 AM   #1
Supporting Member
 
JamieJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 123
Default Preparing News response to FDA decision?

I was wondering if the ECA, CASAA or some great minds on this forum have thought about preparing a news statement ahead of time to respond to which ever way the FDA rules on this case. It would seem that perhaps this would be an opportune time to have a good response with proper education prepared to send or email to major newpapers or television stations as there is a good chance that the FDA decision will make the news and if we send out info with a contact name and phone number of an organization leader it would be easy for reporters to have a response ready and know someone to contact to hear the our side rather than reporters trying to seek out anyone to comment on their experience with e cigs.

Last edited by JamieJ; 10-21-2009 at 06:39 AM.
JamieJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 08:27 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mtndude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Posts: 245
Default

Great opportunity for combined efforts... once CASAA is established, we will be putting together a Communications team.

I'm sure there are limitless talents to draw from.
__________________
Support CASAA
mtndude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 11:14 PM   #3
Super Member
 
Vocalek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 613
Default

No need to wait. I have contacted some other writers running for the CASAA board about forming a team now to get started on CASAA's response(s).
__________________
Vocalek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 04:32 PM   #4
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

The ECA has a Rapid Response Kit that is in the final proofing stages now that will be available here asap, which will be available for assistance for local bans and prohibition...

As far as a response to the Judge's ruling... Matt has been forming relationships over the past 5 months with journalists and is ready to go no matter which way the judge decides. These relationships are becoming more sound which is evident from the presence of the ECA and Matt in many news reports lately. It bares well on the communities ability to be heard with the media when the judge does finally make a ruling.
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 04:42 PM   #5
Super Member
 
doots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,127
Default

great work everyone. keep up the hard work God bless you!
doots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 10:38 PM   #6
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

The ECA, the only functioning group at the moment, could do us all a favor by contacting our allies NOW -- Drs. Siegel, Nitzkin, Rodu, Whelan and Laugesen -- and asking if it would be okay to get a statement from them once a decision in this case is handed down.

Then Matt, or an ECA rep, should indeed call them for reaction and quote them in a press release. The mainstream press doesn't know enough about this topic to know whom to contact. They'll call ASH, the American Lung Association, the New Jersey senator. They don't know of Siegel's position, of Rodu's long harm-reduction battle, or Laugesen's Health New Zealand research now almost two years old.

And the press won't give a rat's patootie what any of us think about the decision. We are not important in any way. Get experts ready to react. Do NOT prepare anything sour grapes or conspiratorial in tone. It will be laughed into the circular file. Imagine a few e-addicts questioning the long-deliberated verdict of a federal judge! Laughable.

Let the experts say what needs to be said, and the press will listen. Let everyone else fade away like exhaled vapor.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:49 AM   #7
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
The ECA, the only functioning group at the moment, could do us all a favor by contacting our allies NOW -- Drs. Siegel, Nitzkin, Rodu, Whelan and Laugesen -- and asking if it would be okay to get a statement from them once a decision in this case is handed down.

Then Matt, or an ECA rep, should indeed call them for reaction and quote them in a press release. The mainstream press doesn't know enough about this topic to know whom to contact. They'll call ASH, the American Lung Association, the New Jersey senator. They don't know of Siegel's position, of Rodu's long harm-reduction battle, or Laugesen's Health New Zealand research now almost two years old.
Allies have already been contacted and are waiting
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:01 AM   #8
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

Bravo, bravo. What is not needed is a bunch irate e-smokers getting quoted as being irked by a federal judge's carefully weighed decision. Or shouting about "personal freedoms". Or condemning the President and the FDA. That would be a turnoff to the 4 out of 5 who don't smoke .. and don't care how this goes down.

In order to matter, a name needs modifiers: eg., "Dr. Murray Laugesen, head of Health New Zealand, where studies have been conducted for almost two years .. "

Find those names that have great modifiers. Call 'em "credentials" if you must. Good for you.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:11 AM   #9
ECF Veteran
 
nitewriter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hendersonville Tennessee
Posts: 1,262
Default

So CASAA should not prepare a reply? Even if it's constructed in an intelligent and non-condemning way?
__________________
Quote: "What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day."—Dr Ley former Commissioner of the FDA.
nitewriter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:31 AM   #10
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

No, it should not. It has no standing with the public or press. ECA's Matt Salmon now does. Let ECA handle this one. I look forward to the day when CASSA has earned influence; today is not that day. A knee-jerk reaction, no matter how well-worded, would be a stumble out of the gate. Let ECA work for us on this.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184