e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Campaigning > ECA
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

ECA Electronic Cigarette Association

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2009, 05:28 PM   #11
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burlington, WI
Posts: 91
Default

so does that mean that the eca has no info to back up that second hand smoke has no affect on people?

When he was asked if it was safe for someone to inhale the vapor by second hand he gave no clear cut answer. Than Cunningham went off to make it seem like everything was okay but the man never gave a straight answer.
__________________




Last edited by wiscoking13; 10-27-2009 at 05:59 PM.
wiscoking13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 05:48 PM   #12
Super Member
 
Vocalek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 606
Default

Your question is unclear. What is the antecedent for the relative pronoun "that" (3rd word in your sentence)?
__________________
Vocalek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 05:56 PM   #13
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiscoking13 View Post
so does that mean that eca has no info to back up that second hand smoke has no affect on people?

The goal isn't to get into a debate on second hand smoke. That has been debated for years and years and years and people are staunchly on the side that they are on.

What needs to happen is that people begin to understand the differences between smoke and vapor, combustion and vaporization.

If we can start to get both sides of the SHS argument to see that there is an alternative to smoke and that is vapor, there really isn't a need to argue about SHS anymore.
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 08:12 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
catwoman19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 291
Default

Good interview BigJim, you make us proud
__________________
catwoman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 08:15 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
mtndude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catwoman19 View Post
Good interview BigJim, you make us proud
well, it wasn't BigJim... but he would have done just as well, I'm sure
__________________
Support CASAA
mtndude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:27 PM   #16
Supporting Member
 
Kate51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Argyle Wi USA
Posts: 1,935
Default

That SHS question only emphasized the need for more more more......testing!!!
I got into a scuffle the other day when a guy asked if it was ok to smoke near his 3 week old baby.
I posted my usual exerpt from Ruyan testing, on exhaled vapor...whoo. Opened the dam gate there. Nicotine, none detected. Acrolien, none detected. No, because it wasn't VG vapor that was tested. Does that mean then that the vapor doesn't contain un-absorbed nicotine or other toxins. No, not really. Prove a negative? So far, there's some who come away as skeptics on that question.
Here. Once again, when we wish PV's to be compared to 'tobacco cigarettes', they are not. (FDA tests.)
When we don't want them compared, they are!! (PR firms.)
Perspective, please.
__________________


Smokers have more choices than just quitting or dying

Last edited by Kate51; 10-27-2009 at 09:31 PM.
Kate51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 11:09 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 191
Default

I fear that the FDA report/warning is the one thing that sticks in the minds of the uniformed. First impressions tend to cling are difficult to overcome. I wish there were more of these favorable mentions of the e-cig out there. They need to be seen and heard repeatedly, to overcome those negative, first impressions.

Bravo, Jim! Well done! And special thanks to Bill Cunningham!
__________________



Last edited by Debra; 10-28-2009 at 06:36 PM.
Debra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 05:29 AM   #18
Supporting Member
 
JamieJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 123
Default

Awesome interview and great information given. Thanks Jim for posting the interview!
JamieJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 02:52 PM   #19
USA Supplier
Forum Sponsor
 
LaceyUnderall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: US and Canada
Posts: 2,707
Send a message via Yahoo to LaceyUnderall Send a message via Skype™ to LaceyUnderall
Default

Here is the official cut down version for those rolling through:

Interview with James Watt, Electronic Cigarette Association Vice Chair | Electronic Cigarette Association

Bill Cunningham is syndicated on over 300 radio stations nationwide and read the USA Today article regarding the ecig. Appearing on his show was James Watt, Vice Chair of the Electronic Cigarette Association.

If you click on the link above... it will play only the interview!

BigJimW and James Watt are not one in the same. (Sorry BigJimW)... but I just realized WHY people are getting confused!!! LOL
LaceyUnderall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184