![]() |
| | ||||||
| Notices |
| ECA Electronic Cigarette Association |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 |
| Full Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Burlington, WI
Posts: 91
|
so does that mean that the eca has no info to back up that second hand smoke has no affect on people? When he was asked if it was safe for someone to inhale the vapor by second hand he gave no clear cut answer. Than Cunningham went off to make it seem like everything was okay but the man never gave a straight answer. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Super Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 606
|
Your question is unclear. What is the antecedent for the relative pronoun "that" (3rd word in your sentence)?
|
| | |
| | #13 | |
| USA Supplier Forum Sponsor | Quote:
The goal isn't to get into a debate on second hand smoke. That has been debated for years and years and years and people are staunchly on the side that they are on. What needs to happen is that people begin to understand the differences between smoke and vapor, combustion and vaporization. If we can start to get both sides of the SHS argument to see that there is an alternative to smoke and that is vapor, there really isn't a need to argue about SHS anymore. | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Orlando
Posts: 291
|
Good interview BigJim, you make us proud |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Supporting Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Argyle Wi USA
Posts: 1,935
|
That SHS question only emphasized the need for more more more......testing!!! I got into a scuffle the other day when a guy asked if it was ok to smoke near his 3 week old baby. I posted my usual exerpt from Ruyan testing, on exhaled vapor...whoo. Opened the dam gate there. Nicotine, none detected. Acrolien, none detected. No, because it wasn't VG vapor that was tested. Does that mean then that the vapor doesn't contain un-absorbed nicotine or other toxins. No, not really. Prove a negative? So far, there's some who come away as skeptics on that question. Here. Once again, when we wish PV's to be compared to 'tobacco cigarettes', they are not. (FDA tests.) When we don't want them compared, they are!! (PR firms.) Perspective, please. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 191
|
I fear that the FDA report/warning is the one thing that sticks in the minds of the uniformed. First impressions tend to cling are difficult to overcome. I wish there were more of these favorable mentions of the e-cig out there. They need to be seen and heard repeatedly, to overcome those negative, first impressions. Bravo, Jim! Well done! And special thanks to Bill Cunningham! |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Supporting Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Washington State
Posts: 123
|
Awesome interview and great information given. Thanks Jim for posting the interview!
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| USA Supplier Forum Sponsor |
Here is the official cut down version for those rolling through: Interview with James Watt, Electronic Cigarette Association Vice Chair | Electronic Cigarette Association Bill Cunningham is syndicated on over 300 radio stations nationwide and read the USA Today article regarding the ecig. Appearing on his show was James Watt, Vice Chair of the Electronic Cigarette Association. If you click on the link above... it will play only the interview! BigJimW and James Watt are not one in the same. (Sorry BigJimW)... but I just realized WHY people are getting confused!!! LOL |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|