e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > The E-Cigarette > Tips & Tricks > Experiments with equipment
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2009, 08:11 PM   #21
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

A significant downside with a pure piezo approach is that the mist it creates will feel cool as opposed to warm. Perhpas the liquid can be warmed first but that warmth will be gone i suspect before the mist reaches the mouth. The reason for going with heating coils / vapor rather than piezo / mist might well have been because it better simulates smoking / is more pleasant, rather than cost as people have tended to assume.

ps : the tin might be coming from a tin coat on the nichrome wire. http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=5078&page=2

Last edited by kinabaloo; 04-10-2009 at 08:25 PM.
kinabaloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 09:07 PM   #22
ECF Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,057
Default

Maybe I am off base, but it seems to me that anything we can do to retard the build up of carbon on the heating element is our best choice to increase the longevity of atomizers. A quick rinse in warm water each and turning the atomizer upside down to drain overnight is the easiest, preventative measure I can think of.

I had my first atomizer fry this week. When I took it apart, the material inside the heating coil was black and brittle. I cannot imagine anything reviving wicking material once it has reached that point. This particular atomizer was only dripped using a variety of smoking juices.
breakfastchef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 03:38 PM   #23
ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
 
exogenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 560
Default

Just as a matter of interest,

I forgot that I had evaporated the some of the same e-liquid on piece of metal sheet,
and analysed that as well.

Analysis showed a far 'cleaner' makeup compared to the 'burnt' coil gunk (not too surprising),
particularly NO metals, not even calcium,
but still quite a bit of silicon (from additives or plant extract material ?)




Code:
SUMMARY  
       % by atoms % by weight
Carbon    81       75
Oxygen    16       19
Metals     0      0
Silicon    2        5
Nitrogen   1        1
So some (most?) of the metals in the coil deposit must be coming from the coil itself,
especially the tin (from the solder blobs ?).

The sodium. calcium and potassium could be left behind during evaporation/concentration of the liquid,
I estimate a factor of 2000 or so in these tests,
but also maybe some from the atomizer coil as well.
exogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 03:41 PM   #24
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

This is an analysis of the dry residue of your e-juice? Slowly evaporated, right. Or the evaporated liquid?

Why don't the sodium, potassium and calcium show up? Because the analysis is of the liquid after evaporation? Before and after would be nice (eek - more work)

What is the 2000 factor?

We need cleaner juices! Say NO to dry residue !!

Last edited by kinabaloo; 04-11-2009 at 03:54 PM.
kinabaloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 07:43 PM   #25
ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
 
exogenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 560
Default

The analysis directly above is for quickly evaporated, but not burnt e-liquid,
i.e. the clean residue after evaporation.
(not the re-condensed vapour we were PMing about).

I guess the metals don't show cos it needs a 2000x concentration
to get a detectable amount of them,
or they are not present in the liquid itself, but come from the coil.
Probably a bit of both.

2000 is my very approx. estimate of 2ml e-liquid converted to 1 cubic mm of coil gunk,
i.e. the residue left after vaping 2ml on a hot coil.

Actually I though that showed the liquid it to be very 'clean',
if you dont burn it,
or contaminate it via a hot wire with solder blobs.
exogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 08:18 PM   #26
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Exogenesis - The carbon and oxygen are showing as with inorganic bonds?

Likely, the dry residue is mostly flavourings.

At present the flavorings used in juices, including those bought from vendors i imagine, are the flavourings made for food where dry residue is not an issue. If juices were made with flavorings with no dry residue, we would have far less of a problem with atomizers getting deposits and the need to clean them / replace them so often.

Last edited by kinabaloo; 04-11-2009 at 08:24 PM.
kinabaloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 11:58 PM   #27
ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
 
exogenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 560
Default

Mostly organic bonds it seems.

Maybe thats true about most of the residue coming from flavours,
perhaps later I'll try this again several times with:

1 pure VG
2 pure PG
3 'flavourless' e-liquid probably TW's
4,5,6... loranne flavours straight from the bottle, or perhaps 1 in 3 with PG,
(I've got some non-oil, 'non-sugar' ones I don't like much)
then ditto, but sugar containing ones
then ditto, but oil containing ones

Trouble is it takes at least 2days to get 10 ml of liquid through the 'autosmoker',
in order not too have it flooding, or running dry too long.

Last edited by exogenesis; 04-12-2009 at 12:01 AM. Reason: typos
exogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 01:29 AM   #28
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Atomiser death - new theory

We all know that atomizers eventually die and it was long believed, reasonably enough, to be that the fine nichrome wire broke after the repeated stresses of expension and contraction, plus getting thinner as it slowly gets thinner with age.

Sun created a new theory about the final death - through examining many deceased atomizers he noticed that the nichrome wire had been disconnected at the the solder joint; his theory being that as the deposit on the coil grew bigger, it eventually pulled out the wire from the joint.

I think this may play a small part sometimes, but is not the main reason.

A well-soldered joint could not be pulled apart. Unless ... the joint had become weakened.

I believe the solder joint is weakened chemically (perhaps aided by heat) by the juice/vapor. In particular, tin is leached from the solder joint making it much softer and the join looser. Eventually, the electrical connection is lost (and the nichrome wire might even remove its leg from the joint to take up a more comfortable position (i.e. not necessarily with any great force exerted by the deposit growing in size).

The evidence for this - and also the inspiration, though it took a day for the implications to become apparent to me - was discovered by Exogenesis in his analysis of atomizer coil deposits (Analysis of the Black Gunk on Atomizer Coils). The results showed an unusual amount of the element tin within the deposit.

A possible solution is for silver solder to be used for connecting the nichrome wire heater coil.

It remains uncertain what part of the juice causes the leaching of tin and by what reaction or other effect.

Exogenesis - yes, that's a lot of work! Could you use smaller samples for analysis or is 2 days worth the minimum can work with?

Last edited by kinabaloo; 04-12-2009 at 01:58 AM.
kinabaloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 01:48 AM   #29
ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
 
exogenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 560
Default

Good theory, certainly a lot of things can happen at a joint
between two different metals, chemically speaking.

The solder blobs are so large in comparison to the thin nichrome
that if anything I'd hazzard that the wire itself would weaken at the joint.

I like to get a close as possible to real vaping on the auto-vaper,
so getting a reasonable encrustation of gunk is the aim.
Actually the OP was a little light on 'crust depth', so I'll probably
run analysis again when more liquid has been used on this coil.

(assuming the wire etc last that long)
exogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 02:11 AM   #30
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Although i have found reference to tin, among others, sometimes being used to thinly coat nichrome wire, i doubt it is used on our nichrome because it would likely lower the resistance too much. Instead, it is coated by enamel (at least the ones i have are, 901s). The reason for a coating presumably because nichrome otherwise gains a thin oxide layer though since that would be protective, like with annodised aluminium, i'm not sure why this is sometimes done. In the case of the enamel it is just for electrical insulation, for winding overlapping coils and such.

I have not found mention of a tiny amount of tin being part of the nichrome alloy as yet, but it's a possibility. Solder, of course is a much softer alloy so more likely the source.

I am looking into what might attack solder joints - acids might, even VG/PG might have some effect, perhaps on the flux. Any thoughts?

Thinking about it, the maufacturers probably avoided lead based solder and used the Tin-copper-silver variety. So an alternative solder to avoid this problem might need consideration of another alloy.

Exogenesis, perhaps as you alluded, the juice sets up an electrochemical reaction at the join between the wire and the solder. Something like: tiny electrical current because two metals in contact causing an electolysis in which the tin goes into solution.

Last edited by kinabaloo; 04-12-2009 at 02:23 AM.
kinabaloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
atomisers, cleaning, residue, technical

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184