![]() |
| | #71 | |
| ECF Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: North Yorkshire UK
Posts: 2,892
| Quote:
__________________ It's time to 'really' do something about changing this world for the better, click the link:- http://thevenusproject.com | |
| | |
| | #72 |
| USA Supplier |
I have a full ingredient list, directly from the manufacturer of over 90% of the e-liquid on the market today: Propylene Glycol (77%) Ethanol (10%) 1-Malic Acid (3%) 3-Methylcyclopentane-1,2-dione (2.5%) Vanillin (2.5%) 2,3,5,6-Tetramethyl Pyrazine (1.5%) Acetyl Pyrazine (1.5%) Menthol (1%) 2,3,5-Trimethyl Pyrazine (0.3%) Rhodinol (0.3%) 2-Acetylpyridine (0.2%) Beta-Damascenone (0.2%) Hopefully this helps solve a few mysteries. Source: Yunnan Dekang Biotechnology Co., Ltd And I'm not sure if this was answered before, but I saw someone ask: yes, propylene is used in the making of plastic - most notably polypropylene, which is a very hard plastic once polymerized. - Def |
| | |
| | #73 |
| USA Supplier |
The above link to the manufacturer site loads very slowly for me, but for those who don't wish to wait 10 minutes for it to load, it goes directly to a scan of their SGS certificate which verifies that the chemical composition has been tested and verified to be correct. I assume the percentages are figured on a per ml basis. - Def |
| | |
| | #74 |
| Full Member Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 14
|
I'm totally fascinated... However, the atomizer appears to work like a spark plug. If you remove them from an engine... Umm.. spark plugs ... a white tip denotes lack of fuel... a black tip (which you can hit with a cig lighter, it will burn) denotes too much fuel. The normal appearance would be rather metal looking. I'm thinking it isn't the liquid itself... but the air/fuel ratio... poor combustion leaves gunk. Katt |
| | |
| | #75 | |
| Full Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 67
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #76 | |
| Full Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 67
| Quote:
Speaking of which, anyone tried grill cleaner on the atomizer? I'm still working my way through threads, but haven't seen it yet. Quick search doesn't turn up if it has been tried. | |
| | |
| | #77 | |
| ECF Veteran | Quote:
Pete: if your main trouble is money (as it clearly is at the moment, hope it passes soon for you!) - wouldn't the choice you have to make be: go back to the least liquid-using and gunk-forming way of e-smoking that costs the least atomizers, even if it is less satisfactory (but at least being able to continue vaping that way)? Meaning: wouldn't it be wise to at least lower the power you are putting onto your devices (and adjust device to power then being used if neccessary)? For what it's worth: I find, myself, that using a pen-style and operating at 4 to 5v on the atomizer (through using a powerpack) plus using a manual switch gives me the most satisfactory results sofar as to atomizerlife: vape moist but not overly wet most of the day; and at least once per day vape your coil rather dryish; then take off mouthpiece and watch your coil while using the switch (blow gently if smoke gets in the way) until it lights up nice and orange quite soon after you press the switch - then it's pretty 'clean'. Sometimes you have to do this burning-cycle a couple of times (if there is still a lot of buildup in there - then it can take quite a while before starting to get orange, meaning you have to let it cool down a bit, then repeat until it glows quickly). My HeavenGifts cigar that I use alongside the above is taken through the same routine, though this one works completely on just the standard small battery (3.6V) - here too I dry-smoke and reset once a day to get a quick glow. On average (with the occasional bad-luck factor chiming in of course) my pen-atomizers last more then a month, if I'm lucky even around 2 months (my HG-cigars last around 3 months; and then I can just swap them at no more cost then a few dollar postage seeing a 5-y guarantee, cheap way also Pete...) But... I do 'pay my price' for going this way: a bit less vapor-production then many would love to see. It's worth the 'profit' of using less liquor and less atomizers for me though (I simply _have_ to pay attention to costs also...) (What might be of interest to the researchers here also: I used to have a 'backdoor-possibility' to get Ruyan-atomizers (penstyle) very cheap - no more, alas - and those lasted much longer, a few up to half a year or so... must be something special going on there...) | |
| | |
| | #78 |
| ECF Veteran Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: North Yorkshire UK
Posts: 2,892
|
Hi Katink.... all the mini pipe atomizers I have had so far have become un-vapable well within the guarantee period ....but at the rate they are failing it would be a full time occupation for me to keep on sending them back and claiming on the guarantee and I just can't see how Tim could stay in business if I keep on claiming on the guarantee (he has said that all I have to do is send them back and he will send me new ones) ....Unfortunately I can't send any of them back now because I cant help taking them apart and trying to find the cleaner that will dissolve that black gunk and solve the problem of them failing in the first place.....lol The frustrating thing is that they they only really need to last me for at 'least' a couple of weeks anyway because by my calculations that should make it a little bit cheaper than smoking ........providing all the other parts don't need replacing too often. The mini pipe is brilliant if it wasn't for the atomizers longevity. the rest of the parts do seem to be proving to have a decent cost effective longevity.
__________________ It's time to 'really' do something about changing this world for the better, click the link:- http://thevenusproject.com |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| atomisers, cleaning, residue, technical |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|