e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > The E-Cigarette > Tips & Tricks > Experiments with equipment
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2009, 05:25 PM   #21
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Hi Exo,

That's an interesting result. And means, among other things, that a juice with no gunk production should be possible. The nicotine, if included, will have to be a pure source and not a tobacco soak. Some flavorings will also be dry-deposit free.

Perhaps a small amount of VG can be used without decompositon - say, 10%. 50/50 if it does or not. If 10% is ok, maybe 20% can be tested; 20% would be enough to get some noticeable visible vapor improvement. Maybe even 50% could be tested as the original test used 90% VG if I remember correctly, which nobody actually uses.

Adding a little pure ethanol might help too in making a small fraction of VG usable without any decomposition,

Good work - takes our understanding forward and can lead to improvements in taste and atomizer lifespan

ps : I haven't seen SunVaporer post those yet; been 2 or 3 weeks now. Perhaps the water or PG was not pure, some old dry deposit in the mesh, something like that. Or perhaps a different protocol factor, such as % split. In fact, as I remember, the PG+water was vaped by a friend while SV vaped the VG+water.

Last edited by kinabaloo; 05-03-2009 at 05:39 PM.
kinabaloo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 05:36 PM   #22
ECF Veteran
 
surbitonPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Yorkshire UK
Posts: 2,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exogenesis View Post
Re-read that acrolein from glycerol in tobacco smoke,
(& even though it's from Phillip Morris) it's quite enlightening.

Having second thoughts about
'glycerol just being like any burning organic liquid on a hot coil',
specifically probably similar to PG or other carriers...

cos just now observing pure PG vaping on a fresh exposed coil (550mA)
& it seem's to be producing no burnt gunk whatsoever.

We'll see what it's like after 20 to 30 ml.

Did SunVaporer post his VG vs PG results?
That seems to point to this ecopure liquid probably being 'worse' for gunking up coils because it's all VG and not PG.
__________________
It's time to 'really' do something about changing this world for the better, click the link:-
http://thevenusproject.com
surbitonPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 05:54 PM   #23
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surbitonPete View Post
That seems to point to this ecopure liquid probably being 'worse' for gunking up coils because it's all VG and not PG.
Hi Pete - That is looking to be the case, yes.

I hope it is found that a small fraction of VG can be safely used.

And as some people seemingly don't react well to PG (or perhaps an impurity), we maybe need to find an alternative that is not VG or PG.

And a form of nicotine that will volatize completely.

Last edited by kinabaloo; 05-03-2009 at 05:59 PM.
kinabaloo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:01 PM   #24
ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
 
exogenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 560
Default

This is a huge difference between pure PG & pure VG,
still no deposit at all, even with trying PG flow 'too dry' and 'too wet'.

Maybe the added water changes it completely ?,
I had to add 10% DI water to the glycerol to make it flow sensibly.

Wonder if the 'less than 20% glycerol' in e.g. TW e-liquid
doesn't give as much gunk (per amount of VG) as straight
glycerol because of the bulk PG thats there as well,
something like alcohol reducing the boiling point/ heat capacity ?

Looks like I've got a few more tests to do than I thought.


Some people have allergy or other reactions to PG,
was this the only reason the lab reports seem to
recommend using VG rather than PG?

What liquid is volatile enough, non-toxic, gives no reactions for anyone,
doesn't heat-decompose and is tasteless or has a pleasant taste ?
Is PG the closest we'll come ?
exogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:10 PM   #25
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exogenesis View Post

What liquid is volatile enough, non-toxic, gives no reactions for anyone,
doesn't heat-decompose and is tasteless or has a pleasant taste ?
Is PG the closest we'll come ?
Water

Though a glycol is needed for the smoke effect. Just looking into dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol. Boiling points of 235C and 265C respectively. Both on quick glance seem similar to PG safety-wise but may share the same allergy problem for some. Raised B.P.s over PG but long-lasting, dense fog

Mineral oil (baby oil), that is mostly alkanes, is also used in some fog juices.

Very interesting results. Does lead to more hypothesis testing though But this is pioneering work (even if quite basic really!)

Last edited by kinabaloo; 05-03-2009 at 06:21 PM.
kinabaloo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:12 PM   #26
ECF Veteran
 
surbitonPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Yorkshire UK
Posts: 2,892
Default

Oh and I can't really say what the vodka did....it did make my failing mini pipe atomizer vape almost as good as new for a few days....but unfortunately it died this morning and it was my last mini pipe atomizer....I need a bit of time before I can buy any more and I am not so sure I want to risk spending more money on those.
__________________
It's time to 'really' do something about changing this world for the better, click the link:-
http://thevenusproject.com
surbitonPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:28 PM   #27
Moved On
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 7,355
Default

Sedansa have started using PEG400 - polyethylene glycol instead of glycerine or propylene glycol.
Kate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:30 PM   #28
ECF Veteran
 
kinabaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london uk / beijing china
Posts: 3,306
Default

Pete - sorry to hear your e-pipe. Cheer you up with an interesting fact: mineral oil (baby oil) is good at removing sticky labels

Found this interesting link about safe exposure limits to theatrical fog for actors:
AEA Fog haze and Smoke Guidelines | J&M Special Effects
kinabaloo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:33 PM   #29
ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
 
exogenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 560
Default

Now I'm going to have to go and get some PEG400 as well.

'Mineral oil' sounds a little undefined, is it a recognised 'formulation' ?
(edit: looks like a mixed-content by-product of the petroleum industry)


Any chance of you doing a dead atty dissection Pete ?

Last edited by exogenesis; 05-03-2009 at 06:39 PM.
exogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2009, 06:35 PM   #30
ECF Veteran
 
surbitonPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Yorkshire UK
Posts: 2,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinabaloo View Post
Pete - sorry to hear your e-pipe. Cheer you up with an interesting fact: mineral oil (baby oil) is good at removing sticky labels

Found this interesting link about safe exposure limits to theatrical fog for actors:
AEA Fog haze and Smoke Guidelines | J&M Special Effects
That's so funny and kinda bizarre that you mention sticky labels .....I was in Halfords today and happened to buy a tin of stuff specially designed for removing sticky labels...(I buy every cleaning fluid I see these days!) in the hope it might have some cleaning effect on my coils.......needless to say it doesn't work.
__________________
It's time to 'really' do something about changing this world for the better, click the link:-
http://thevenusproject.com
surbitonPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
acrolein, decomposition, deposit, glycerine, gunk, polymerisation, polymerization, vegetable glycerine

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184