+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Dry Burn Cleaning of An Atomizer in Tips and Tricks; This is my experience today. My BE112 penstyle atomizer was not producing as much vapor as it should. A new ...
  1. #1
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,207

    Default Dry Burn Cleaning of An Atomizer

    This is my experience today. My BE112 penstyle atomizer was not producing as much vapor as it should. A new BE112 has a resistance of 3.5 ohms; this particular atomizer was reading near 12 ohms. Normally, I would pitch an atomizer with a high resistance as it is FTD (fixin' to die). On a lark, I decided to do a series of 20 second dry burns on my 6 volt vaping device. After six dry burns, the resistance fell to 4.1 ohms.

    While this is very positive, the atomizer still does not hit as well as it did a few days ago. I can say that the dry burns must have destroyed much of the junk on the atomizer heating coil, thereby reducing resistance. While I do not see any benefit from cleaning atomizers, the dry burn (periodically or regularly) may be of benefit to atomizer health.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #2
    PV Master ECF Veteran kinabaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london uk / beijing china
    Posts
    4,987
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default

    breakfastchef - you were lucky not to finish it off

    used daily with a shorter time and at 3.7v it can keep the coil clean; have seen it work on a coil outside of the atty casing.

    what's so curious about what you report though is the chnge in resistance.

    one would expect deposit buildup to reduce efficiency because it heat insulates the coil from the liquid / raises the heat capacity of the coil.

    if the deposit were fairly electrically conductive it would lower the resistance a little (perhaps very little). but i can't think of a reason why the resistance could ncrease by nearly 3x. heat insulation by the deposit would increase the coil temp on the inside f the deposit and that would increase the resistance of the nichrome - but by only about 1% or so. so quite a mystery. i can only assume for now that this was a faulty measurement somehow (easily done, no blame intended). how did you do the resistance measurement? off-load with a meter set to R or by measuring the current?

    one might imagine that the coil resistance would increase with age if it does indeed get thinner, but you report that after cleaning the resistance dropped again.

    very interesting because maybe there is something new to learn / explore in this ...
    Last edited by kinabaloo; 10-11-2009 at 04:22 AM.

  4. #3
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kinabaloo View Post
    how did you do the resistance measurement? off-load with a meter set to R or by measuring the current?
    I figured you would be interested in the topic, kin. Yes, I make the resistance readings off-load with an auto-ranging DMM. I iave a few high resistance atomizers that have been retired, so I will fiddle with the dry burning to see if my first results were a fluke.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO