<br /><strong>Warning</strong>: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <strong>[path]/includes/class_postbit_alt.php(474) : eval()'d code</strong> on line <strong>41</strong><br /><br /><strong>Warning</strong>: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <strong>[path]/includes/class_postbit_alt.php(474) : eval()'d code</strong> on line <strong>41</strong><br /><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[e-cigarette-forum.com &bull; The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat - Instead Electronic Cigarettes]]></title>
		<link>http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum</link>
		<description />
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:51:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1963's Electronic Cigarette]]></title>
			<link>http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/instead-electronic-cigarettes/47635-1963s-electronic-cigarette.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Believe it or not, there was a patent for the electronic cigarette dating back to the sixties! 
 
And take a look!  Does it resemble the beloved Pen...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Believe it or not, there was a patent for the electronic cigarette dating back to the sixties!<br />
<br />
And take a look!  Does it resemble the beloved Pen Style or what?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.e-cig.org/2009/11/07/new-invention-of-1963-the-smokeless-non-tobacco-cigarette/" target="_blank">New Invention of 1963: The Smokeless Non-Tobacco Cigarette<br />
</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/instead-electronic-cigarettes/">Instead Electronic Cigarettes</category>
			<dc:creator>LaceyUnderall</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/instead-electronic-cigarettes/47635-1963s-electronic-cigarette.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Smoking Bans - Are they Backwards?</title>
			<link>http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/instead-electronic-cigarettes/44993-smoking-bans-they-backwards.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:02:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Smoking Bans &#8211; Are they backwards? (http://www.e-cig.org/2009/10/23/smoking-bans-are-they-backwards/) 
 
This post discusses what is wrong with...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.e-cig.org/2009/10/23/smoking-bans-are-they-backwards/" target="_blank">Smoking Bans &#8211; Are they backwards?</a><br />
<br />
This post discusses what is wrong with smoking bans, how they COULD be effective and also why on earth would anyone ever include an electronic cigarette in a &quot;smoking&quot; ban.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/instead-electronic-cigarettes/">Instead Electronic Cigarettes</category>
			<dc:creator>LaceyUnderall</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/instead-electronic-cigarettes/44993-smoking-bans-they-backwards.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
