ANTZ suggestions on FDA comments....
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
Like Tree65Likes

Thread: ANTZ suggestions on FDA comments....

  1. #1
    Double Guru Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Kent C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NW Ohio US
    Posts
    20,736
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default ANTZ suggestions on FDA comments....

    From glantz blog

    h ttps://tobacco.ucsf.edu/how-submit-public-comments-fda-ecig-and-cigar-deeming-and-ucsf-comments

    Interesting to know, but this isn't to recommend or to not recommend doing the same.

    Also glantz is reporting what a Tobacco group (NATO) is telling their retailers regarding 'comments'

    h ttps://tobacco.ucsf.edu/what-tobacco-retailers-are-being-told-say-fda-about-cigars-pipe-tobacco-and-ecigs

    [Premarket Review Background: Do Not Include in Comments: For cigars, pipe tobacco, and electronic cigarettes, that were not on the market as of February 15, 2007, manufacturers of these products would need to submit a premarket tobacco application (PMTA) to the FDA within 24 months following the effective date of the final deeming regulations. If a PMTA application is filed with the FDA during this 24-month period, then the manufacturer can continue to market its products unless and until the FDA responds to the application. The standard to be used by the FDA in reviewing PTMA’s will be whether the tobacco product is appropriate for the protection of the public health or detrimental to the public health.]

    Also (just posted)

    h ttps://tobacco.ucsf.edu/shareable-microsite-generate-comments-fda-deeming-docket
    Last edited by Kent C; 07-10-2014 at 06:41 PM.
    faile and EleanorR like this.

  2. #2
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran DrMA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Seattle area
    Posts
    2,116
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    That's ok, we have those facilities as well. Here, let me help - click the link below to submit your own comment:

    http://www.regulations.gov/#!submitC...4-N-0189-20870

    Edit: In light of the "quantity vs quality" argument, I've decided to start submitting single-issue micro-comments daily from now until the comment period is closed. Today's topic: the recent ASH reports debunking the gateway myth.
    Last edited by DrMA; 07-11-2014 at 06:04 AM.
    Kent C, DC2, faile and 7 others like this.
    The war against vaping continues: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/fda-regulations/
    Get involved: casaa.org

  3. #3
    Double Guru Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Kent C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NW Ohio US
    Posts
    20,736
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    I just figured it is always good to know what your enemy is thinking

    The quantity vs. quality thing does make a lot of sense and if they're counting and tagging subject matter or pros and cons then it may be a good idea. It read like they're doing a 'division of labor' thing as well - splitting up subjects/points. We're not that organized .....yet
    EleanorR and aikanae1 like this.

  4. #4
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran DrMA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Seattle area
    Posts
    2,116
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default ANTZ suggestions on FDA comments....

    We can do 'division of labor' individually, as I suggested above. Last nite I submitted a 1-page comment discussing the ASH findings from England, Wales, and Scotland. Today I'll write another 1-pager with the ECITA ejuice report. Ergo, work was divided.

    You can find the micro-comments mentioned above on my blog. Feel free to reuse.
    Last edited by DrMA; 07-13-2014 at 04:57 AM. Reason: spelling
    wv2win, DC2, EleanorR and 5 others like this.
    The war against vaping continues: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/fda-regulations/
    Get involved: casaa.org

  5. #5
    Super Member ECF Veteran sky4it's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Informative. Thanks.

    If the best spin doctor they got is Glantz, makes me think we got a chance. If only people would come together.

    wouldnt it just be weird if 5 years from now we found out Glantz was sneaking into bathrooms smoking Pall Mall's and had a bottle of listerine strapped to his leg. I knew this Professor one time when I was in college and he,,<<<< oh never mind.
    DC2, EleanorR and Jman8 like this.
    "What we got here is failure to commu..n..icate, some men you just can't reach." - Cool Hand Luke.

  6. #6
    Senior Member ECF Veteran Just Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kent C View Post
    I just figured it is always good to know what your enemy is thinking
    Wouldn't it make sense to think they're doing the same by reading here and elsewhere? I'm guessing they are.
    zoiDman likes this.

  7. #7
    My 0^10 = Nothing at All* ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    zoiDman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Local Group - Earth
    Posts
    18,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Just Me View Post
    Wouldn't it make sense to think they're doing the same by reading here and elsewhere? I'm guessing they are.
    I don't think there is much Doubt that they Are.

    I know many HR Managers read this site to get Information on the Way that People use e-Cigarettes.

  8. #8
    Double Guru Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Kent C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NW Ohio US
    Posts
    20,736
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Just Me View Post
    Wouldn't it make sense to think they're doing the same by reading here and elsewhere? I'm guessing they are.
    There's no 'guessing they' are - they are. It's been stated in some articles.


    Prue Talbot conducts study on ECF posts, grossly misrepresents facts

  9. #9
    My 0^10 = Nothing at All* ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    zoiDman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Local Group - Earth
    Posts
    18,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kent C View Post
    There's no 'guessing they' are - they are. It's been stated in some articles.


    Prue Talbot conducts study on ECF posts, grossly misrepresents facts
    If I live to be 100, I could do Without Hearing the name Prue Talbot.
    Kent C, DC2, EleanorR and 2 others like this.

  10. #10
    DC2
    DC2 is offline
    I'm Chucked Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    DC2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    19,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoiDman View Post
    If I live to be 100, I could do Without Hearing the name Prue Talbot.
    I've got a list of names of people I don't want to hear open their blowholes ever again...

    1) Stanton Glantz
    2) Ellen Hahn
    3) Prue Talbot
    4) Senator Boxer
    5) Senator Durbin
    6) Senator Harkin
    7) Senator Rockefeller
    8) Senator Waxman
    9) Senator Blumenthal

    I'm sure there are many more, but you get the point...

    If I get some time, maybe I'll compile a list of the people who want to kill us.
    I know the above is just a short list with room for tremendous growth.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast