Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46

Thread: Looking for the NEW dse901 atomizer

  1. #31
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    536

    Default Confusion -- Please help

    I am so confused. Could you take a moment and answer a few questions for me:

    1. What is a mic switch? What are the advantages/disadvantages of having one?

    2. What if we use a 4075 (longer) cartridge with a 901 (higher bridge) atomizer? Will it cause a problem?

    3. What is we use a 901 (shorter) cartridge with a 4075 (lower bridge) atomizer? Will it produce less vapor than a 4075 cartridge with a 4075 atomizer?

    4. Is there a difference in the working life of the "new" 901 atomizer vs. the "old" 901 atomizer vs. the 4075 atomizer?

    5. Does the "new" 901 feature a better (i.e., better energy production & longer working life) battery than the "old" 901 and/or the 4075?

  2. Advertisement
  3. #32
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Trapped within my imagination
    Posts
    1,513

    Default

    good questions palmetto, Wish I could help you out...but I'll just be watching for the answers too lol....I do know that I like the filling/stuffing in my 4075 (accordion look) waaay better then the bunched up poly in the others....

  4. Advertisement
  5. #33
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran Houdini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    2,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Palmetto View Post
    Actually, there are two atomizer-specific cartridges: one for the "original" DSE 901, and one for the the 4075, although the suppliers never bother explaining that. The 901 cartridge is shorter, one piece, totally black and meets the higher bridge, while the 4075 cart is slightly longer, has a brown extension, and meets the lower bridge. You can also tell the difference in the thickness of the mouthpiece -- look at the carts on Totally Wicked's website -- those are for the 4075 (the atomizers they sell are 4075's). The mouthpiece is slightly thicker, and has a hole instead of the slit of the original 901 mouthpiece.

    All I can tell you for sure, is that if you buy carts from TW, or Heaven Gifts/Ruyan, for the 901/4075, you are buying 4075 carts. If you buy carts from Best E-Cig or AltSmoke, you are buying the shorter carts for the original 901.

    I have the "original" 901 that I bought from AltSmoke -- he sells the shorter 901 carts to match, as does Best E-Cig.

    I also have a ScrewDriver, which comes with the the (recommended) 4075 atomizer and carts and I buy carts for that from either TW or Ruyan/Heaven Gifts, since Trog doesn't sell parts.

    It's just a mm or two difference -- but it does make a difference.
    I know there are two different cartridges. I posted the pictures of them right above your post. I guess what I meant when I said it won't save from dripping more is that they both hold the same amount of juice.
    They both work with a SLB atomizer and they both work with the 4075.

  6. #34
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Trapped within my imagination
    Posts
    1,513

    Default

    oops I meant good questions Tescela .. My bad

  7. #35
    Kit
    Kit is offline
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,757

    Default

    Houdini loving the pic's !
    I said "NO" to nicotine but he wouldn't listen !

  8. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Those pics above are pretty much it.

    My atomizer does not have the datet but rather an "SLB BD " and some sort of (hard to make out without a magnifying glass) number like "36785"... I don't have a screwdriver, but I could probably find a way. I remember having the tip off on the NON SLB and puff the atomizer and it lit up. I briefly tried this once with the SLB and again just now and did not notice it turn red hot...

    I find the SLB seems to flow a lot smoother, produce more vapor and seems to last all day at work on one cart. The non SLB seemed to taste kind of burnt while not producing as much vapor and I was constantly topping off. I much prefer these latest 2009 SLB's (again my batteries seem to have an even newer switch operated by pressure not sound or sealed, but more reliable with better processor then the older batteries with pressure switch, motorola still, I think).

    So I think these latest models went back to the pressure switch. Also, the battery is about 2mm shorter then the first union batteries. I read this was extra space at the LED that allowed this. Makes sense as the LED is brighter then the first union batteries.

    I have 6 of the SLB batteries and 2 of the first union in circulation (1 other first union died first cycle which I believe was the switch and the eight is being returned with that kit). I was thinking the SLB atomizes better because the battery seems better (e.g. more power or battery juice to atomize the juice, haha). But, after reading about the newer atomizer, etc. perhaps some of the extra vape and is as a reult of the new atomizer too.

    Just my experience, but my wife agrees way more vapor and smoother flow and only uses her SLB after I gave that one to her. The only first union we have she has and has not gone back to.

    The flow is smoother through the atomizer, I believe. Yes, the tip help some too, but even the first union tips flow better on the SLB then on the first union atomizer and seem to hold much more juice...

    The newest SLB (if that is what I have) seem to be better quality overall, atomizer, battery, vape, taste, reliability, build, alignment, etc. so far. Granted I have only been vaping on them for about a week...

  9. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Houdini View Post
    I know there are two different cartridges. I posted the pictures of them right above your post. I guess what I meant when I said it won't save from dripping more is that they both hold the same amount of juice.
    They both work with a SLB atomizer and they both work with the 4075.

    It is my opinion/experience comparing side by side that the newest SLB cart and the atomizer both hold more juice and flows better (e.g. much easier drag) then the first union / 4075 cart and atomizer.

    Yeah, I can edit my posts now and post links, just reached 15 posts, haha
    Last edited by Glock; 05-14-2009 at 05:26 AM. Reason: Add the word "newest" in front of SLB because I can!

  10. #38
    Full Member ECF Veteran elevenzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    G'ville, So Carolina
    Posts
    89

    Default



    Ok, I'm not trying to get off subject or go all psychedelic. But does anyone else see what resembles a boy and girl in the glow on Houdini's photo? (Is it just my overactive imagination?)...nice illusion Houdini



    Back on subject - I have both a DSE 901 and a 4075. I have found that both models are completely interchangeable from the carts to the batteries and chargers.. Personally I prefer using the RN cart I think it vapes easier and stronger.


    Here is another thread regarding that 2009/901 model I believe the OP was referring to...
    http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...009-model.html

  11. #39
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    chuckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    miami fl USA
    Posts
    716

    Default pics

    Those are really great pictures Houdini...Thanks
    Chuck

  12. #40
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran Houdini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    2,104

    Default

    Your welcome. And no elevenzen, I don't see the it.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •