e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > The E-Cigarette > General E-Smoking Discussion

General E-Smoking Discussion Chat with other users. Discuss the different types of e-cigarettes. Swap stories about using them and other people's reaction.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2008, 07:03 PM   #21
Super Member
 
TheEmperorOfIceCream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by katink View Post
As far as I know, PG is the cheaper one (certainly in bulk).
But also remember the report TB just found ... maybe PG, as long as you aren't over-sensitive to it, IS better in the end, because of the safety to your health that it seems to give, if that report remains unrefuted... no idea if VG would have those same results.
Hi Kat

Yeah, I was inching towards VG until I saw Bob's report. I'm still mainly a cart user, so PG's the only game in town for me. I think I'll probably end up just dripping, especially if the JC juice is as good as everyone says. I pre-ordered both versions of the sample pack so I'll get an idea of the relative merits - taste-wise at least, I haven't noticed any bad effects from PG.

Emp
__________________
Forgotten but not gone...
TheEmperorOfIceCream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 07:09 PM   #22
Super Member
 
TheEmperorOfIceCream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karenwest1961 View Post
This is something we all need to read. Here it is translated:

PG investigated

Hi Karen, how's the fin?

This pretty much confirm's Bob's status as the oracle of e-ciggery. There's an element of butt-covery from the agency involved but it's obvious that, to the official mind, our gizmo presents as a drug delivery device. We can only hope that rationality prevails when the inevitable emotive arguments start.

Emp
__________________
Forgotten but not gone...
TheEmperorOfIceCream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 07:12 PM   #23
Super Member
 
karenwest1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 829
Send a message via Yahoo to karenwest1961
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEmperorOfIceCream View Post
Hi Karen, how's the fin?

This pretty much confirm's Bob's status as the oracle of e-ciggery. There's an element of butt-covery from the agency involved but it's obvious that, to the official mind, our gizmo presents as a drug delivery device. We can only hope that rationality prevails when the inevitable emotive arguments start.

Emp
It's gonna happen, Emp. I'm just surprised it hasn't happened yet.
__________________
www.tracesjourney.com
karenwest1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 07:14 PM   #24
Full Member
 
margouillat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rouen, France
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karenwest1961 View Post
We're getting food grade PG drops at a time and not in quantities to constitute overdose. I'm not sure how the child ingested the PG. I tried to translate the page with Babelfish but still was not a good translation. My guess is the child may have gotten hold of some antifreeze made with industrial PG. I couldn't imagine that a 2 year old child would drink down a bottle of lotion.
it's by suction toilet wipes for infants
margouillat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 07:22 PM   #25
Super Member
 
TheEmperorOfIceCream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 911
Default

Yeah, we're doomed. Only to eye-watering taxes, I hope, but the free ride won't last...
__________________
Forgotten but not gone...
TheEmperorOfIceCream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 09:40 PM   #26
Super Member
 
karenwest1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 829
Send a message via Yahoo to karenwest1961
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by margouillat View Post
it's by suction toilet wipes for infants
So the child sucked on baby wipes? They sure didn't make those non-toxic, did they? I'm surprised, really. The child must have taken a severe allergic reaction to the PG or maybe another ingredient in the wipe.
__________________
www.tracesjourney.com
karenwest1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 09:55 PM   #27
Super Member
 
karenwest1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 829
Send a message via Yahoo to karenwest1961
Default

Okay, I am reading about PG in baby wipes as being "dangerous" and this page cites information that "has not been released to the public." BUT...they in turn are selling something. It would be nice if they would at least put more information and perhaps a few links. Anyway, check it out:

Baby wipe danger

All other sites and blogs refer to that same link when discussing baby wipe danger. I can't find any more information on it.

My children turned out fine. They got their bottoms wiped with them, their bodies, they stuck 'em in their mouths (not after getting their butts wiped of course!), etc.
__________________
www.tracesjourney.com
karenwest1961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 10:03 PM   #28
Full Member
 
margouillat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rouen, France
Posts: 63
Default

Karenwest

I think lucid not take cash for everything that is said
The information comes from the National Center for Scientific Research
Obviously, it is questionable as he is just as questionable to accept the arguments of sellers who are not scientists
Remember how the information on cigarettes has been truncated!
margouillat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 01:05 AM   #29
Super Member
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 2,529
Default

That anti-aging site is absolute crap ... the worst kind of unsubstantiated fear-mongering masquerading as science. Toss it as the garbage it is and move on.

This is exactly what is meant when people say the Internet is not always a good thing. Not with sites like that one spewing misinformation that others will reference as "gospel." Look for science sites. Real science backed by research studies.

This site is for the drink-your-own-urine-to-be-healthy set.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:12 AM   #30
Full Member
 
margouillat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rouen, France
Posts: 63
Default

The cases I have found appears to be an isolated case because obviously the PG is always used in toilet wipes in France
This can be a warning on babys. Just as it is recommended not to allow products to clean the house near the babys
margouillat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2008


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28