+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 67891011 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 108
No Lead Paint Detected in Testing Atomizers or Batteries in The E-Cigarette; let's hope it stays lead free! there's no reason to have lead in paint.. dunno why some manufacturers in china ...
  1. #91
    Ultra Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    NatureBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Peterborough, Canada
    Posts
    1,261

    Default

    let's hope it stays lead free! there's no reason to have lead in paint.. dunno why some manufacturers in china still use it.

    its great to see you actually took the time and spent the money on testing! valuable info to have for sure.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #92
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Thanks for taking time and money to do these test.

  4. Advertisement
  5. #93
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston TX
    Posts
    11

    Default

    yup yup. definatly =]

  6. #94
    Full Member ECF Veteran qdilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    the windy city
    Posts
    123

    Default

    Thank you .

  7. #95
    Bird Brain ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Poeia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,919

    Default

    This is great info. Thanks for doing it.

    I would assume the manufacturers aren't purposely using materials with lead in them -- it's more a question of quality control. As the effects of lead are cumulative (and we are shoving this stuff into our pulmonary systems), it's good to know that these manufacturers are obviously taking care to get uncontaminated materials.

  8. #96
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    420

    Default

    Yeah, this really is a big difference from regular cigs. Big companies will still try to find reasons to push ecigs out of the markets. Let's hope they do not succeed...
    ecigs rule!

  9. #97
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Well done! One less thing to worry about. Just relax and enjoy the lead free vape.

  10. #98
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Bradenton, Florida
    Posts
    56

    Default

    I would feel safer purchasing atomizers manufactured in the USA due to all the China scares in the past. Glad to know they are not intentionally poisoning us.

  11. #99
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    sweet, one more reason to defend our vape!!!

  12. #100
    Full Member ECF Veteran timmah34233's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sun Vaporer View Post
    I had tested for Lead paint the following atomizers and batteries both in black and white and they all came back negative for lead in all of them:

    Atomizers and Batteries tested:

    801 SLB's Originals
    801 from Eastmall
    BE112 from Best
    RN4072 from Njoy
    RN4072 from First Union
    RN4072 from Puresmoker (old style)
    510 from Joy
    510 from Eastmall
    901 from Puresmoker
    BE901 from Best
    901 SLB's Original's


    Testing was done on the inside as well as the outside of each device.

    I find this to be good news and worth the time and money.


    Sun
    Thanks, Sun. Good(God) to know, and your effort is well appreciated. This is good news, and worth the time and money. Definitely. This part of the job seems to be completely vaporized.

    I have a masters in chemistry and ten years of experience with environmental analytical work.

    Two things:

    1) I can tell now that the Chinese company "Best E-Cigs" is open for discussion around here at ECF, a best as I can tell. I wasn't sure about that based on my sense of the forum rules. Until further notice, I want to discuss my experiences with this company.

    2) Lead is NOT the only toxicity concern, folks.

    I am male and my name is not "Debbie," BUTt(head-Beavis) this is a serious downer topic. ("How does timmah assume a "stealth Debbie Downer" and keep those frowns turned upside down?")

    I want a safe and effective nicotine PV. (I can speak ONLY for myself. I am aware that the soliloquy of Malcolm McDowell in the character of Caligula is pertinent.)

    Until I have better data to support the safety of PV attys, I remain skeptical.
    • What is the "true" composition of that metal wool in the atty?
    • Is the respiratory tract suffering vapor deposition of any toxic metal?
    • If the metals are safe, are attys standard across the industry?
    As I said elsewhere at ECF, there better NOT be any cadmium. I heard "nickel foam" and it ought not be that either. Even if metal vapor deposition is negligible, it must not be a NEW health risk.

    Will I stop using my PV? No! I don't want to inhale TOXIC, carcinogenic tobacco smoke to get my non-carcinogenic nicotine.

    I am not a pig, if you ask me, and I'm not from Guinea. I frequently behave in ways that tend to my animal side. Mostly, I struggle with translations from my native Timmah. I'm also getting late for a performance of third-generation Jamaican ska(...ska, ska) music at the .... & Bull in support of an effort to revise local noise ordinances. This is a very poetical "situation" at several levels, if it weren't for the confusion induced via auto-censor auto-replacement of the venue's first name, which must be circumlocutionally described in run-on fashion to include but not be limited by many unnecessary sentence components as another name for a male chicken.

    Do you suppose the FDA is gonna read this and offer me a job? Doh!

    Switched to nicotine PV December 10th, 2009. "Looking good, Billy Ray! Feeling good, Louis!"

+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 67891011 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO