+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 74
Like Tree1Likes
I need the antifreeze thing cleared up in The E-Cigarette; I can't find a thread that fully explains why we can accurately claim that the PG we use is not ...
  1. #1
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran thewomenfolk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Colorado John 3:16
    Posts
    1,501

    Default I need the antifreeze thing cleared up

    I can't find a thread that fully explains why we can accurately claim that the PG we use is not the same thing that's used in Antifreeze.

    Is Proplyene Glycol actually stated on bottles of Vanilla flavoring as an ingredient? Is it also stated as an ingredient on Antifreeze bottles? I'm confused.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #2
    Super Member ECF Veteran skyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nacogdoches,tx
    Posts
    333

    Default

    anti freeze is ethylene glycol, it's apples and oranges
    proudly vaping since may 28th 2008. bartleby, e-power, provari,torpedo tank,jon boy tank, and who knows whats next....

  4. Advertisement
  5. #3
    Super Member ECF Veteran tmbrown327's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    RI
    Posts
    840

    Default

    PG is used in a lot of ways. One of the uses is in anti-freeze, a way to make it less or non-toxic. I'm sure they use a less pure (industrial) grade for this application, but it's still PG. Just the fact that it's used as an ingredient in this application doesn't mean it's harmful to us. There are a lot of threads on this.

  6. #4
    ECF Administrator
    "Captain Tightpants"
    Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    AngusATAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    GA, USA
    Posts
    11,360

    Default

    PG is used in a lot of liquid medications. Somehow I doubt that means that the pharmacists are all out to kill us.

    Water is also an ingredient found in antifreeze. Does that mean the FDA should ban water?

    It's called scare tactics.
    stelly1234 likes this.

  7. #5
    Full Member ECF Veteran Nokosa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Maryland - United States
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AngusATAT View Post
    Water is also an ingredient found in antifreeze. Does that mean the FDA should ban water?

    It's called scare tactics.
    This is pretty much the answer. There are several ingredients in anti-freeze that we use commonly on a daily basis, such as water.

    Just because an ingredient is found in something harmful to us doesn't make that ingredient itself harmful.

    Think of it as chemistry. Take two perfectly harmless ingredients and mix them together and they can make a deadly poison. Same concept.

    PG is perfectly fine. PG, as an ingredient itself, is approved by the FDA. Go figure.

  8. #6
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AngusATAT View Post
    PG is used in a lot of liquid medications. Somehow I doubt that means that the pharmacists are all out to kill us.

    Water is also an ingredient found in antifreeze. Does that mean the FDA should ban water?

    It's called scare tactics.
    Splenda is derived from sugar but it's first use was in clorox, I still use it in my coffee. You would have to be a chemist to assess what is toxic or not.Pg is also used in icing

  9. #7
    Supplier Associate ECF Veteran RenaissancePuffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    892

    Default

    While the wiki is not always the best source of information, their entry for PG is a good one. This may help answer some questions.

    Propylene glycol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  10. #8
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran thewomenfolk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Colorado John 3:16
    Posts
    1,501

    Default

    Thanks for all your answers. Now I can at least speak about the issue with some real knowledge. Thanks for the Wiki link, good info! As for Proplylene Glycol it says... "The most direct way of applying a substance to the human body is injection into the blood or the tissue, closely followed by ingestion or inhalation. Making the curing agent reliably available to the organism is key to the efficiency of any pharmaceutical application. Propylene glycol USP/EP (pharmaceutical grade) is qualified and approved for this use as laid down in the respective Pharmacopoeia (USA, EU, Japan etc.)."

    Yepsidoozers!!!
    Last edited by thewomenfolk; 09-27-2009 at 06:02 PM.

  11. #9
    Super Member ECF Veteran dedmonwakin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Destin,FL.
    Posts
    584

    Default

    "In all fairness, it should be stated that PG was only added to anti-freeze to replace Ethylene Glycol. It had been a problem because dogs often lap up puddles of anti-freeze."

    Propylene Glycol: The Good, the Bad and the Alternatives
    Nothing snazzy to write, at the moment. So for now, enjoy my sig of nothingness.

  12. #10
    Full Member Estrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Spanaway, WA
    Posts
    39

    Default

    I used to work in supplements, and for YEARS the FDA has been trying to convince people that PG is safe for consumption.

    accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=582.1666

    It's commonly used like aforementioned as an additive or carrier in medications, as well as used in foods, cosmetics, deodorants, supplements (Twinlabs Fish Oil for one) etc. I think it's hilarious that they use the preexisting public stigma of a product they've pushed so hard to show is safe to villainize a product that can save millions of lives. The wording I noticed in one of these reports given - "Propylene glycol is a component of antifreeze, a known carcinogen".

    Unless the FDA is referring to carcinogens as "Generally recognized as safe", then the only concerns remain about ethylene glycol, and methanol which according to the same databases, either of which are carcinogenic either. Now you don't want to go ingesting the stuff either, for example ethylene glycol is known to cause crystallization/calcification in tissue, eg: kidneys.

    From the CDC Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry:
    • Ethylene glycol ingestion first affects the central nervous system (CNS). After a characteristic latent period, signs of inebriation may be followed by serious illness and even death, caused by toxic metabolites.

      Propylene glycol, which is much less toxic than ethylene glycol, is metabolized to compounds that are normal constituents of the citric acid cycle.

      No health effects have been reported in persons chronically exposed to ethylene glycol or propylene glycol at levels found in the environment.

    This said I would be concerned about the material components used in liquids but if you're buying from a reputable dealer the likelihood that your liquid is any more dangerous than fish oil or cough syrup is slim. There is such a wealth of information and misinformation out there and the FDA, as always, is at the forefront.

    (Maybe the better question is who stands to gain from a ban on a product that would potentially save one in ten lives? philly.com/inquirer/health_science/daily/20090924_FDA_bans_flavored_cigarettes.html)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO