E juice tests. Can anyone translate please?

[No burn baby]

As in the title.

Ampullen en Liquid testje - E-Cigtest Community

[sanneke]

I can translate that, but I would think I need permission from Knutselpeter to do that and then post it over here.

I dunno.......

[No burn baby]

What is the general gist?

[sanneke]

I'm leaving to go out for dinner right now.

I'll get back later.

[dc2k08]

Translated version of http://www.e-cigtest.com/showthread.php?p=11#post11

[No burn baby]

Thank you, the pictures remain to be untranslated though, that is what I am interested in.

[usehername]

In an effort to find a cleaning method I did a similar non scientific experiment. I used 3 drops of fluid on a spoon heated till vaporized and observed the resulting deposit left by both JC juice and typical Chinese juice. At first the deposit was more noticable with the JC fluid. (Mint chocolate was what I happened to be using at the time) This particular flaver is pretty dark in color by comparison so I tried a second attemp using a similar color. The two were basic tobacco now. Both seemed to leave a similar deposit but the chinese fluid deposit would clean off with just water. The JC deposit was not so easy to remove. Isopropyl did a good job with minimal effort. This confirmed my attemps to clean a stuffy atomiser in which nothing worked as well as the Isopropyl. I had been using JC fluid in that atomiser for the most part.

[usehername]

Another note of interest: 3 drops of each fluid I tried vaporized completely in almost the exact same amount of time. 1 minute and 20 seconds.

[No burn baby]

Interesting. I wonder if the same results would be yielded with the newer batches of JC. And how the PG would compare to the VG. Hummmm.

[usehername]

I am not being critical of JC. Nor am I blaming a stuffy atomiser on their juice. It is merely an observation. I will continue to use JC fluid and also get into the habit of cleaning my atomiser with isoproyl on a regular basis. I actually prefer JC.