To follow up on MNZ's thread

[karenwest1961]

id hazard a guess and say that hes talking about nicotine...but who knows...

My guess is nicotine too...but we have to make sure. Any reputable company would post what the hazardous material is.

McDonald's tells you that some of their food comes in contact with peanuts which may cause allergic reaction in some people. How would we feel if they say "Some of our food comes in contact with an ingredient which could be potentially fatal." That's how I think RuToo is treating e-smokers.

[sanneke]

Why even bother..................

Sorry but a salesperson will say anything to sell something.

Why would they care about your health if they can sell you **their** cartridges.

[RatInDaHat]

it's called truth in advertising.. As of right now they aren't lying., but that depends on what they are talking about.

[TropicalBob]

My goodness ... BOTHER. Rutoo didn't make some flip remark to be dismissed as inconsequential. What kind of e-smoker wouldn't be bothered to learn liquid might be dangerous? I don't understand any "ignorance is bliss" attitude. Ignorance is ignorance. I want an answer, too! Rutoo must either back up the statement with fact and attribution or get it off the Web site.

[RatInDaHat]

Here, here..

[leaford]

It's not ignorance, it's judgement. I can judge this guy as the e-cig equivalent of a used car salesman based on the evidence thus far presented. He's a snake, and snakes wriggle; I really don't need to know how he wriggles to know that. Fear mongering and competition bashing. That's all it is. And trying to pin them down n it is going to be a wasted effort. They will either ignore you or spin more lies.

[karenwest1961]

I want to know and I think we are owed an explanation.

With all due respect leaford and sanneke, don't hate on us because we want to pursue this and discuss it. Which is why I posted it in the heath and medical issues forum and not on the General Discussions forum. MNZ's thread went south before we could all agree to come to our own conclusions. I would appreciate if this did NOT happen again.

[leaford]

I am not hating on you, Karen, just on Rutoo.

[karenwest1961]

I am not hating on you, Karen, just on Rutoo.

Good. That's where it should be directed.

[sanneke]

I want to know and I think we are owed an explanation.

With all due respect leaford and sanneke, don't hate on us because we want to pursue this and discuss it. Which is why I posted it in the heath and medical issues forum and not on the General Discussions forum. MNZ's thread went south before we could all agree to come to our own conclusions. I would appreciate if this did NOT happen again.

Sorry Karen, that was me talking to the company, not you.
Nor was I critiquing the discussion.