+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48
Fog machines & glycol-based liquids & e-cigg in Health and Medical Issues; Not a single pleasure of life is worth giving up for five years more dribbling at the end of it. ...
  1. #21
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran TheEmperorOfIceCream's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,092

    Default

    Not a single pleasure of life is worth giving up for five years more dribbling at the end of it.

    Emp
    Forgotten but not gone...

  2. Advertisement
  3. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    183

    Default

    My sentiments exactly

  4. #23
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
    Glycerine is also incredibly sweet, so getting it in the mouth is not at all unpleasant. I have no idea why it isn't used instead of PG in the the commercial nicotine solutions. Dr. Loi has been using glycerine, too.
    Has this question gone to Ruyan or have they avoided the issue? I'm interested also.

  5. #24
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    72

    Default

    regarding the initial post:
    from what I saw on the net, most commercial stuff for fog machines is not only made from PG and water but most of them contain poliethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol and triethylene glycol (causes fertility problems in rats ). all of these are toxic, or way more toxic than PG.

    They are using them in various proportions to make fog more thick, to last more, to have it stay at various levels above the ground etc.
    Also, in clubs, they prefer to use more triethylene glicol than PG because PG and glycerine leave a slimy residue on the walls and everywhere but TG doesn't. TG also gives a longer lasting fog.

    Now, why they are using it is clear, WHY are they allowed to use them is another problem!?!


    Another potential issue with your e-cig, but especially for a machine that makes thousands of cubic foot of fog per minute is that if the liquid is burnt (bad atomiser, for example) it decomposes in Carbon Monoxide, CO2 and various aldehydes, formaldehyde (known carcinogenic) being one of them.


    I found a good link to check the official toxicity reports for chemicals:
    [can't put link] hazard dot com; then go to SIRI MSDS collection link

    From what I saw until now about PG and glycerine I couldn't find anything too worrying, so I'll use it for now without fear. The only thing I'll try to avoid is the 'burnt' smell.

  6. #25
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    141

    Post PG & Glycerine Info

    Just a little something I ran across.

    Probably already well known in here, but here it is for those that might not be sure.

    I use PG & Glycerine in my fire sprinkler systems @ 50/50 with water to form a -26 F Antifreeze.

    Googled: Atomized Glycol Fog

    Atomized Glycol Fog

    MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE PUTTING IN YOUR HOME BREWS.

    Important Points

    * This type of fog is heated and will rise or disperse at a higher level than dry ice or liquid nitrogen fog. Coolers can be used if low-lying fog is desired.
    * Changing the mixture or conditions of dispersion of atomized glycols can result in many special effects that are difficult to achieve with other simulated smokes.
    * Glycols can undergo heat denaturation into highly toxic substances, such as formaldehyde. This is one of the major problems with homemade smoke machines - they may operate at a temperature that is incompatible with the substances being used. Also, this is a danger with homemade fog juice used in commercial machines.
    * Glycols, glycerine, and mineral oil can all leave an oily residue, resulting in slick or sometimes slightly sticky surfaces. Be aware of the potential safety hazards, especially since the smoke may limit visibility. Also, some people may experience skin irritation from exposure to glycol fog.
    * Some glycols are toxic and should not be used to create smoke. Ethylene glycol is poisonous. Some glycols are sold as mixtures. Medical or pharmaceutical grade non-toxic glycols only should be used in smoke machines. Do not use antifreeze to make a fog mixture. The ethylene glycol types are poisonous and the propylene glycol types always contain undesirable impurities.
    * If water is used, it needs to be distilled water, since hard water deposits can damage the atomizer apparatus.
    * Some of the chemicals that can be used for this type of smoke are flammable.

  7. #26
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,161

    Default

    Effects of theatrical smokes and fogs

    Chronic work-related wheezing and chest tightness were significantly associated with increased cumulative exposure to fogs (mineral oil and glycols) over the previous 2 years. Acute cough and dry throat were associated with acute exposure to glycol-based fogs; increased acute upper airway symptoms were associated with increased fog aerosol overall. Lung function was significantly lower among those working closest to the fog source. Conclusions Mineral oil- and glycol-based fogs are associated with acute and chronic adverse effects on respiratory health among employees.


    Special Effects Facts & Hazards

    Propylene Glycol
    CAS# 57-55-6

    Uses: Organic synthesis, antifreeze solutions, solvents, flavoring extracts, perfumes, coolant in refrigeration systems, hydraulic fluids, deicing fluids for airport runways, and cosmetics.

    A skin and eye irritant. It affects the central nervous system in humans.

    Acute/Chronic Hazards: This compound may be harmful by inhalation, ingestion or skin absorption. When heated to decomposition it emits toxic fumes of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.

    Symptoms: Symptoms of exposure to this compound may include central nervous system depression. Other symptoms may include convulsions. In children, exposure can cause stupor, tachypnea, tachycardia, diaphoresis and seizures.
    Last edited by jamie; 07-17-2008 at 11:23 AM.

  8. #27
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL USA
    Posts
    5,624

    Default

    Good finds, Jamie. And doesn't this concern you?

    NO ONE has ever sucked these glycol-based vapors multiple times daily into their lungs for a long period of time. We're more than funny little guinea pigs. Worse off than a lab rat testing Chantix. We blithely act as if this were safe! Yikes. We only get one set of lungs and they don't grow back.

    I'd really, really like better research before we encourage the world to join us in this practice. Remember when cigarettes were just a cool way to use tobacco (all previous uses -- sniffing, chewing, pipes and cigars were far safer)? Time proved otherwise.

  9. #28
    Super Member ECF Veteran karenwest1961's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    860

    Default

    Gawd, that's frightening, jamie.

    That's the first real information we've got so far about inhalation toxicity. And this is for people who are in some sort of theatrical business that is not exposed to it several times a day for the rest of their lives.

    Has anybody sent this link to Dr. Loi or Dr. Laugensen?
    I'm in the "no drama zone". Save it for the soaps.

  10. #29
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamie View Post
    Acute/Chronic Hazards: This compound may be harmful by inhalation, ingestion or skin absorption. When heated to decomposition it emits toxic fumes of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.
    WHAT!?

  11. #30
    Forum Supplier ECF Veteran leaford's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    shenzhen China
    Posts
    6,553
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spider View Post
    WHAT!?
    Don't panic. I''m sure that's referring to those with allergies to PG, like VP. The same way they refer to rare side effects in medical literature.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO