Inhaling PG - perhaps not the great unknown after all

[TheEmperorOfIceCream]

PG Tips? good idea...

[Stan Ferou]

PG Tips? good idea...

Very punny, Emp

[Nazareth]

Iggy- Grow up- Seriously- take your self-loathign liberal extremism eslewhere- mankind is MUCH better than you and your liberal buddies apaprently are willign to admit- Go whine a river elsewhere- seriuously!

[zagleft1]

'a much more valuable higher form of creation' ?? You utter retard. The 'higher form of creation' to which you refer is single handedly destroying the planet, polluting all of the seas, allowing 35,000 children to die EVERY DAY because they have no food to eat. And you think that represents a 'higher form of creation' ?? You are an idiot of the highest order and your crazy little teenage dirtbag statement has proven it.

For the record, I know plenty about addiction and I have a first class honours degree from UCL in Psychology. I am not in the slightest bit interested in any animal research being conducted to assist addicts of any sort.

To conclude, go and get an education you unimaginable fool.

I hope my position is clear.

Ig- the medicine can't help you if you don't take it.

[karenwest1961]

You utter retard.

Iggle, your use of a this term to demean another poster also demeans those with disabilities.

Read on.

Save the planet when you grow up. Your degree means nothing when it is combined with ignorance.

[TheEmperorOfIceCream]

Don't feed the troll guys - even the monkeys it purports to be defending are referred to perjoratively (goddam monkey). Don't expect anyone with so little of it to be interested in humanity. This is a pretty good thread - might repost the valid parts if we can't drag it back on topic.

Emp

[karenwest1961]

Ah, good point Emp. Repost away!

How about that comparison level of PG in ONE cigarette and about 2 to 4 drops of e-liquid. Where would one find that? I'm talking milligrams in 1 cigarette compared to 2 to 4 drops of liquid. We already know that "e-liquid is 85 percent PG"...let's do some real math.

[margouillat]

In my opinion there is no worry to have in this regard
Simply the question is, why in France, for example, health authorities call for greater caution on ecig
Never on cigarettes real, it has been said about danger of PG when it is burnt
The only indication that exists on a packet of cigarettes are the rate of "goudron"(for example, it's material on the road) and nicotine levels
According to Professor Molimard, it is ridiculous!
Because it is not notified the rate of nitrosamine, which is highly cancérigéne (tumeur, carcinome..in french)
For the level of nicotine, the human body arranges to take the quantity needed whatever the rate content in cigarettes
and it's not problem ! The problem is not the quantity of cigarettes smoking but the during you smoke along your life
While it looks rather an organized attack multinational pharmaceutical companies or tobacco
Excuse me for English write but my english is so poor !

To resume the subject before the "pollution" of it,
I put the link Book Hanan Frenk and Reuven Dar which supports the interview with Professor Molimard
the book title: "a critique of nicotine addiction"
Kluwer Academic Plubisher
A Critique of Nicotine Addiction - Google Recherche de Livres

[clavit]

Ahh good, todays entertainment is in! I actually regretted reporting Iggle to the mods. I only hope Iggle stays off his medication, so that we can continue to enjoy his posts. I'm sure the entertainment value will drop, once he's back on his medicine :-)

[TropicalBob]

This thread is not about you and it's not the place to wage personal fights. It addresses inhaling propylene glycol, something I assume you do as an e-smoker (or do you even e-smoke?). Please confine your educated remarks to the topic. If you'd like to argue animal rights issues, start a thread in Community, where off-topic posts are welcome.