e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Health and Medical Issues > Health, Safety and E-Smoking
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Health, Safety and E-Smoking Discuss any side effects, worries or health problems related to e-smoking technology here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2008, 06:15 PM   #11
Full Member
 
Scaevola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 11
Send a message via Yahoo to Scaevola
Default

Thanks for the quick replies, everyone! I am now on their website. If you click a bottle of liquid, you will see a drop-down menu for PG or non-PG. There is a small question mark next to this menu and clicking it will display this message:
"Here, you will choose whether you would like your selection made from our traditional PG formula or our new Non-PG formula. The primary ingredient in our Non-PG formula is high food-grade vegetable glycerin, a safe consumable compound used in many desserts and sauces. Our Non-PG formula typically produces a similar amount of vapor as our PG version."
Scaevola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 06:19 PM   #12
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Default

Atomized water rapidly evaporates at room temperature. This can be prevented by coating the droplets with a film of oil to give a longer lasting 'smoke'.
To avoid poisoning the audience, theatrical 'smoke' machines used to use food-safe glycerine for this purpose.
A major problem with glycerine was its slow and sticky breakdown leading to oily coatings on walls and furniture in areas of heavy use.
To avoid this problem smoke machine manufacturers now use PG which has quicker and cleaner breakdown characteristics.
The relatively low quantity of vapour from e-cigs should not cause a problem but maybe e-cig manufacturers are concerned that glycerine could clog the atomizer.
Wansbeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2008, 01:07 AM   #13
ECF Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate View Post
My apologies Bertrand, I've not seen where they say that.
Click the "?" next to the non-PG selection box on their website.

Last edited by Bertrand; 11-11-2008 at 01:08 AM. Reason: Oops. Just saw this was already answered.
Bertrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 11:30 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wansbeck View Post
...
A major problem with glycerine was its slow and sticky breakdown leading to oily coatings on walls and furniture in areas of heavy use.
To avoid this problem smoke machine manufacturers now use PG which has quicker and cleaner breakdown characteristics.
The relatively low quantity of vapour from e-cigs should not cause a problem but maybe e-cig manufacturers are concerned that glycerine could clog the atomizer.
What about the "slow and sticky breakdown" in your lungs?
rcross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 01:23 PM   #15
ECF Veteran
 
robw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 608
Blog Entries: 2
Default

That is my question as well. Am I replacing the tar with oil? Am I now coating my lungs with PG or VG? What is the chance I could drown in it?
__________________
robw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 09:09 PM   #16
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Default

It has been several years since I checked out the safety of 'smoke' machines and convinced myself that they were safe enough to give my kids an occasional serious dose for parties etc.
I have had a quick look on the web and not been able to find a reference but from what I can remember the 'sticky mess' is glucose syrup or similar.
Again as far as I can remember, there are no toxic substances produced by room temperature breakdown.
My major concern is what is produced when the atomizer overheats as almost everyone has experienced this.
Glycerine and PG are common ingredients in tobacco so we get some burnt through normal smoking but as some Greek guy said hundreds of years ago "the poison is in the dose".
Wansbeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 01:14 AM   #17
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Default

“some Greek guy said hundreds of years ago”

I had a memory once but years of alcohol and tobacco have taken their toll.

I'm back from the pub now, where I'm allowed to vape, and thought I'd better check this out.
From ingentaconnect.com/content/resinf/opm/2006/00000017/00000001/art00010
I got this:

“Recent anthrax scares have focused our fears on toxic substances and the dangers they pose. But as the Swiss physician Paracelsus noted more than 400 years ago: "All things are poison and nothing is without poison. It is the dose only that makes a thing not a poison."

Paracelsus, regarded by many as the father of toxicology, is often paraphrased to have said that the poison is in the dose ["Alle Ding sind Gifft und nichts ohn Gifft. Allein die Dosis macht das ein Ding kein Gifft ist." (All things are poison and are not poison; only the dose makes a thing not a poison)]. With this statement, Paracelsus considered the apparent safety of toxicants at low doses. Moreover, some substances, although toxic at higher doses, can be stimulatory or even beneficial at low doses. This is the case with compounds such as pharmaceuticals that are used for their beneficial effects, as well as with compounds such as pesticides that are normally used as toxicants. This stimulatory effect of a low dose of a toxicant is called hormesis. Although this phenomenon was recognized earlier, the term hormesis was first used by Southam and Erlich (1943) to describe the effect of an oak bark compound that promoted fungal growth at low doses, but strongly inhibited it at higher doses. They coined this term using the Greek word "hormo" (to excite), the same root used in the word hormone. “

In my defence, Paracelsus sounds Greek to me!
Wansbeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 01:31 AM   #18
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

And you're right about glycerine breaking down to glucose -- which is the same stuff they'll drip directly into a vein in your arm after you overdose on nicotine from 36mg liquid and have to be rushed by ambulance to the emergency room.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 01:54 AM   #19
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Default

Thanks Bob, I must have a few memory cells still working
Wansbeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
propylene glycol

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184