e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Health and Medical Issues > Health, Safety and E-Smoking
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Health, Safety and E-Smoking Discuss any side effects, worries or health problems related to e-smoking technology here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2009, 07:08 PM   #201
Super Member
 
Casey C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 402
Send a message via AIM to Casey C
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markarich159 View Post
These are different physical processes at work. Vaporization is different from Boiling(evaporation). One is a physical phase change(requiring a specific enthalpy). The other is a radical change in particle size. In an atomizer (as well as a fog machine) the glycerin or PG assists the water present to vaporize(this is not steam(gas), rather a mixture of PG/VG/water that has been tranformed from a liquid to a very small particulate vapor- particle size of about 0.04micron). The nicotine(and any other flavors/excipients present in the initial liquid) are taken "along for the ride", so to speak, dissolved within the microparticles. This is why it takes less energy to create vapor then it does steam , and also why the atomizer can function at lower temperatures. This property of glycerine/PG/water solutions has been known for some time. It is a similar principle used in a nebulizer machine(that delivers albuterol/cromolyn/ipratropium solutions to asthmatics). I went to Pharmacy School for 6 years to learn about things such as this. I'm sorry, I did not mean to offend you. I just don't want information that is patently false distributed on these forums to cause hysteria among us fellow vapers. We already have enough to worry about with the FDA, PayPal etc... Ok that's my final word.
oh and one more smug response, you find me an e-cig that nebulizes, then vaporizes, therefore atomizing, and I will buy it from you
Casey C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2009, 07:38 PM   #202
Super Member
 
edlogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: jax fla usa
Posts: 370
Default temperature variations correlate with panic attack symptoms

i have been trying different mixtures of pg and vg and nic juice and at first i was having lots of trouble figuring out why i was able to vape a lot when i first got my ecigs but then i started having panic attacks - sometimes extreme episodes

now i am thinking that it may be temperature related - it seems that when i puff fast enough to keep the vapor relatively cool that i am having no trouble - but if i puff slow and the vapor gets warm - that is when i get the symptoms - and it only takes a minute or two for the symptoms to occur

my first 901 atomizer would heat up the juice more and the vapor was harsher tasting - but it went out and the second atomizer is cooler and smoother

my 510 gets juice built up in the bottom and it doesn't vape well unless i puff really slow and then the vapor gets hotter

i blew out the atomizer and got all the extra juice out of it so that now when i puff it doesn't get as hot and i get good vapor

bottom line - i could not find any correlation to the juice mixes and the panic attacks

but i am starting to think that there is a correlation to temperature of the vapor / atomizing
edlogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2009, 07:42 PM   #203
Super Member
 
MissVapor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vapin Hot Florida
Posts: 602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey C View Post
since post count will allow me to eventually link things I'll keep going,

I'm not interested in the lethal dosage of acrolein, I pointed out that the amounts produced would be small, its long term exposure to a tissue irritant that produces effects at 2ppm that I'm worried about. Throat irritation, respiratory problems, secondary infections, although cancer is ruled out by it not being a carcinogen, it is something you'll be sucking into your lungs repeatedly and regularly
I might have to agree somewhat here...I tried using VG for about a month..the first few weeks I was fine..I had a little bit of sneezing, but it eventually turned into a full blown sinus infection/stuffy nose that took 5 days to clear up after qutiting VG all together...When I would blow my nose, it was the consistency of glue almost, very sticky and green.. I can only imagine what was building up in my lung tissue..
__________________


Tobacco Free Since 5/06/09
MissVapor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2009, 08:27 PM   #204
Moderator
 
Sun Vaporer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey C View Post
since i can't link the article I'll post excerpts

"The Effect of the Humectants Glycerol and Propylene Glycol on Mainstream and Sidestream Smoke Deliveries of Acrolein, Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, Acetone and Propionaldehyde"



"It was found that glycerol, added at a level of 3% to the filler, contributed about 8.5% of the total mainstream smoke (MS) acrolein. A more recent investigiation (2) showed that after spiking cigarettes with glycerol, a small increase in MS acroleim delivery was noted, however a significant increase in sidestream smoke (SS) delivery was found. In order to confirm these findings a more extensive project was commissioned. "


"For MS the addition of glycerol and/or propylene glycol to the filler had no significant effect on the acrolein delivery. In fact, acrolein deliveries at high humectant content, ( 5%) were lower than for the reference cigarette. This is probably due to a lower weight of tobacco in the filler. For SS the addition of glycerol to the filler had a significant effect on the acrolein delivery e.g. 5.4% glycerol gave a 50% increase in acrolein delivery. The acrolein does not appear in the MS smoke in significant quantities perhaps due to-filtration by the filler rod or the filter itself. Approximately 1% of the available glycerol was converted to acrolein during smoking. Propylene glycol had no effect on SS delivery of acrolein. The cigarettes containing both humectants also showed increased acrolein deliveries which were directly proportional to the glycerol content of the filler."

from what I'm reading, propylene glycol appears much safer, the OP was quite correct
Casey C----the evidence based on acutal studies concludes that there is no acrolein production and that VG is no more or less safer the PG. Until more tests are done to prove otherwise, there is no point in stating speculation. This debate about VG v. PG has been going on here for a long time and since then numerous Suppiers and manufactures have done studies and have not found acrolein.

Bottom line is if you do not feel comfortable using VG--then do not use it. But please refrain from rank speculation to people who have been looking at this issue for a long long time here.

Thanks,

Sun
Sun Vaporer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
glycerine, vegetable glycerine

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184