Anyone see this CNN article?

[paladinx]

You know what really sucks about all of this. We are going to have two parties with biases trying to prove two completely different points. I have said it so many times, people are gonna start blocking me, but statistics and studies are art forms much more than they are sciences. The FDA can find .00000001 percent of nicotine in a no-nicotine rated cartridges, and than state something like, oh nicotine was found in a non-nicotine labeled product. Its not a lie, but its not giving you the whole picture. That is exactly what these bastards do on both sides. They pick and choose the facts, then further pick and choose how they want to represent them.

[Mach10X]

PaladinX,
That's why we scientists insist on viewing the raw data. It's a crying shame that the general public is too stupid or doesn't have enough time to look at the raw data. It's also strange that all these claims aren't required to be run through an independent group of neutral scientists to make sure that the claims made from ANY study or experiment are not misrepresented. I'll bet they have a team of lawyer/scientists at work picking and choosing the data to maximize the misrepresentation of such trivial data.