It's a little contradictory. Remember that wikis can be written by anyone and not always 100% correct.
The entire paragraph is a little more informative, if you look at some key words used:
**I'd like to see the research mentioned in the part in italics (my emphesis)Inhalation of the propylene glycol vapors appears to present no significant hazard in ordinary applications. However, limited human experience indicates that inhalation of propylene glycol mists could be irritating to some individuals. Therefore inhalation exposure to mists of these materials should be avoided. Some research has suggested that propylene glycol not be used in applications where inhalation exposure or human eye contact with the spray mists of these materials is likely**, such as fogs for theatrical productions or antifreeze solutions for emergency eye wash stations.[12]
Propylene glycol does not cause sensitization and it shows no evidence of being a carcinogen or of being genotoxic.
It lists one of PG's uses as:
(Which means inhalation.)In smoke machines to make artificial smoke for use in firefighters' training and theatrical productions
Inhalation: Low hazard for usual industrial handling. May cause respiratory tract irritation.Possible air germicide:
Studies conducted in 1942 by Dr. Oswald Hope Robertson of University of Chicago's Billings Hospital showed vaporized propylene glycol inhalation in laboratory mice may prevent pneumonia, influenza, and other respiratory diseases. Additional studies in monkeys and other animals were undertaken to determine longterm effects, especially the potential for accumulation in the lungs. After a few months of treatment, no ill effects were discovered
I added a link to the EPA report that talks about it being approved for inhalation.
I looked up some reports cited and a lot of those theatrical fogger machines use triethylene glycol and the testing didn't include propylene glycol.
Read more:
http://www.esta.org/tsp/working_grou...docs/cohen.pdf
http://www.esta.org/tsp/documents/do..._E1-5_2003.pdf
One 2001 study, Occup Environ Med -- Sign In Page, (I have to register to read) specifically on exposure to PG in high concentrations as a smoke simulator in airlines, seemed to conclude that PG, being a drying agent, dries out the eyes and is a mild irritant of the upper respiratorty system in sensitive individuals. It affected non-smokers more than past or current smokers.
But again, nothing has been approved SPECIFICALLY for use in PVs yet, but seeing what the componenets of PV ARE approved for can help us (personally) decide if the risk is minimal enough to continue use while specific testing is done on PVs.
I welcome any comments here - the more we know, the more we can make educated decisions!



2Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks







Bookmarks