+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36
Propylene glycol toxicity in Health and Medical Issues; Originally Posted by voltaire I'm just curious how you knew they were about to poop, and later, how you knew ...
  1. #21
    Inactive Supplier ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by voltaire View Post
    I'm just curious how you knew they were about to poop, and later, how you knew they were constipated? Never mind, maybe I don't want to know!
    Yes, that in itself gave me the proof I need to realize this guy is full of crap.... no pun intended. Notice he hasn't even made the attempt to explain what a few have posted for a response to question his supposed experiment. I certainly hope he washed his hands.........

  2. Advertisement
  3. #22
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran dee5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas
    Posts
    1,307

    Default

    "Yes, that in itself gave me the proof I need to realize this guy is full of crap"

    Idoesmoking is a doctor, professor and researcher and he lives in India so there is a 12 hour time difference. Could be why he hasn't responded yet.
    The car goes where your eyes go.

  4. #23
    FUSIONMAN ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    5cardstud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fusionmans Cave
    Posts
    12,684

    Default

    But that test is moot because the proylene Glycol was burnt in a burning cigarette not vaporized. How much of it was lost to burning or extreme heat versus how much is lost to low heat in vaporizing. And how many people do you know that put it in their cigarettes? I've heard of people putting alot of stuff in their smokes but never propylene glycol. But then I don't know alot of mice that smoke either.

  5. #24
    Official ECF Brat ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    notsoogood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The REAL Washington
    Posts
    3,065

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crashtestjeep View Post
    Im with Doots, I think it say that effects of drying, etc were done after 42 days then the rats were back to normal even tho still exposed? Is that correct? Lotsa BIG words
    So what are you???? A genius!!!??? I didn't understand a thing in that post! LOL I think I need to go back and_read_real_sllooowwwwlllyyyy. Maybe then I can figure it out!


    With my luck my ship will come in and I'll be at the airport.

  6. #25
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran dee5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas
    Posts
    1,307

    Default

    While looking for something else, I found this. Has any one else posted it yet? I hope this link works:
    Propylene glycol in e cigarettes might keep us healthy, says researchers
    The car goes where your eyes go.

  7. #26
    Inactive Supplier ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by idoesmoking View Post
    @Vocalek : Very helpful post.I believed from the day I heard and knew of e-cigs;its an alternative addiction.Like people sniff glue,nail polish remover and hundreds of other stuffs,its like that.e-cig helped me to stop analog cigs- the more dangerous one,I am happy for the fact.I had a WRONG impression,that the companies add something to e-liquid;so,I prepared e-liq in my lab (PG based).I concluded that PG vapor itself has the ability to make one addicted.I had to test it.It would sound inhuman,but I exposed 2 rabbits to PG vapor (5 minx4 times a dayx 4 days)-two after major meals,two before their defecation.On the 5th day,I stopped it.They were aggressive,a bit constipated too.The control rabbit (one) was exposed to water vapour.
    The rabbits are in good health now,dont worry :-)
    I have no intension to make this report forwarded to any organization,for several reasons.
    It is evident to me,I have to quit e-cig too for the benefit of not only my family,but for all who will be benefited by me,directly or indirectly.
    Hope it helps some one.
    By the way,PG vapor has a bronchodilator action too,(like albuterol (aka Salbutamol))-but the mechanism of action is different),so,asthmatics may find a "relief"-this is from my personal experience-I have asthma.But,I made a peripheral blood film of me,examined under microscope-I have noted the reduced Eosinophil count,reduced reticulocyte count,shift to left of neutrophil-an effect that is produced by high dose prolonged steroid use.
    I need more opinion from the super specialists...
    Eosinophil count refers to a blood smear test that measures the white cell content in the blood stream.Escalated counts indicate allergic diseases and infections.

    The reticulocyte count refers to the measure of red cell rate of producion in the bone marrow.(used to determine anemia)

    The shift to left of the neutrophil refers to an increase in the immature neutrophils released from production by the bone marrow in response to fighting infection, usually bacterial infection or inflammation.

    This alone does not indicate other conditions he may have leading to such outcome. As a matter of fact, conducting real research by ethical guidelines usually require a subject to go through extensive testing to rule out precursors prior to experimentation. Nobody here knows whether he may have a condition causing this outcome outside of his exposure to PG vapor and to expect us to reason with his results is out of the question.

    I only refer to the ethics of performing such research on ones' self as bias.... Such ethics are in place to guarantee that the research can be properly validated and there are reasons those guidelines are in place. Whether or not he is a doctor or professor is irrelevant, as it further proves that he should know better than to experiment on himself. Thus, making any findings unconclusive and unproven.
    Last edited by Kattdaddy; 02-07-2010 at 07:01 AM. Reason: added content

  8. #27
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5cardstud View Post
    And how many people do you know that put it in their cigarettes? I've heard of people putting alot of stuff in their smokes but never propylene glycol.
    PG along with VG are actually quite common additives in analog cigarettes. Predictably, they help produce thicker smoke.

  9. #28
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    FLORIDA
    Posts
    335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by voltaire View Post
    PG along with VG are actually quite common additives in analog cigarettes. Predictably, they help produce thicker smoke.

    Exactly,
    that is why the studies were conducted I presume. PG and VG are both common additives in the long list of 'regular' cig additives.

    ...so,
    if you've smoked a cig, you've smoked a certain percentage of vg or pg additive..... but, nowhere near our consumption levels with ecigs.


    and I may be wrong,
    but I do believe that they were added to cigs to retain moisture content in the tobacco, not produce better smoke.

  10. #29
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Birmingham Al
    Posts
    932

    Default

    Thats one point he made. The other was PG is addicting. I suspect we would already know if it was or not given how many products it's used in.

    The whole argument is sort of well...


    Quote Originally Posted by Kattdaddy View Post
    Eosinophil count refers to a blood smear test that measures the white cell content in the blood stream.Escalated counts indicate allergic diseases and infections.

    The reticulocyte count refers to the measure of red cell rate of producion in the bone marrow.(used to determine anemia)

    The shift to left of the neutrophil refers to an increase in the immature neutrophils released from production by the bone marrow in response to fighting infection, usually bacterial infection or inflammation.

    This alone does not indicate other conditions he may have leading to such outcome. As a matter of fact, conducting real research by ethical guidelines usually require a subject to go through extensive testing to rule out precursors prior to experimentation. Nobody here knows whether he may have a condition causing this outcome outside of his exposure to PG vapor and to expect us to reason with his results is out of the question.

    I only refer to the ethics of performing such research on ones' self as bias.... Such ethics are in place to guarantee that the research can be properly validated and there are reasons those guidelines are in place. Whether or not he is a doctor or professor is irrelevant, as it further proves that he should know better than to experiment on himself. Thus, making any findings unconclusive and unproven.

  11. #30
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    223

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by dee5 View Post
    While looking for something else, I found this. Has any one else posted it yet? I hope this link works:
    Wow!! I checked out this Link. Very informative and interesting. To think that vaping might actually serve as a better substitute for a flu shot! (which I wouldn't get anyway, but I know some people like to)

    Thank you so much for sharing it!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO