Good suggestion VP. One could even say both, "...in asthma inhalers and fog machines" if it fits. I'm somewhat indifferent, but if one person has that impression (about fog machines) then others may as well.
Trep - thanks, gotta plug the FB page ; )
I'll update the wording tonight and let you know when that's been changed.
I'm going to be ordering the first round of these soon. If you want some, please send me a PM with your mailing address and how many you want so I can get a rough estimate before ordering.
Updates made.
http://trepshost.com/hoosiervapers/Card-Back.pdf
http://trepshost.com/hoosiervapers/Card-Front.PDF
If everyone is OK with these. I'd like to get the order in no later than Friday, so make sure to PM me your mailing address and how many you'd like.
I like it.
I like it too, great work u guys!!
Looks good to me.
Ok, so I have a suggested change...
The statement "nor any of the carcinogenic compounds present..." is somewhat incorrect. There are trace amounts of TSNA's.
Maybe we should go with the more common "or any of the over 4000 chemicals present..."
What do folks think? Sorry to send it through committee again on you Trep.
-C via mobile
Not a problem all the text is still in a text layer. It's easy to change. As long as everyone is good with it, I can change it quickly.
Huh? The qualifier "present in the combustion of tobacco". Which aims it toward the combustion components. It didn't say "present in tobacco" which would be wrong with the trace amounts of TSNA's that come from the nicotine extraction.Originally Posted by capt.n.coke
Granted we are splitting hairs here. And when you say it that way Hoosier I can see that.
I'm very on the fence and could go either way. Any other votes? If not leave it Trep.
Posting Permissions
8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Bookmarks