:: pokes head into a thread I haven't trod before ::
I do not understand any rationale for banning e-cigs themselves... the hardware. Especially since people can and do vape no-nic liquid. It is not necessarily a "drug delivery device," so any talk of banning the devices should be indefensible and an unmistakable symptom of recto-cranial inversion.
But I AM concerned about what will happen with the liquid. Even if it isn't banned or made Rx... best case, it becomes an OTC drug, like the gum. And the packaging/labeling requirements alone will become a huge burden to small suppliers. The
FDA's gonna want batch testing to verify that a liquid contains the stated amount of nicotine, and they're gonna want those huge annoying Drug Facts boxes on those little tiny bottles, and probably childproof packaging. Flavorings may be prohibited because of that "attractive to children" garbage. No one small will be able to compete in this business, because the costs of compliance will be prohibitive, so our huge corporate overlords will be handed a new way to profit from us.
The closest "analog" (sorry) to vaping I can think of is Nicotrol inhalers, which are Rx. The nicotine comes in 10mg child-resistant carts (4mg delivered, it says) that you plug into a white housing with a mouthpiece. I'm sitting here looking at a nearly full 168-cart box that did my BF no good and in fact expired over a year ago. Great smoking cessation method, that.
Sorry if this is just a rambling n00b post restating things that have been posted 1000 times elsewhere, but it really just hit me today that the liquid is much more potentially problematic than the hardware... so the newborn vaper takes to her keyboard to rant, LOL. If there's a thread with more extensive discussion of this, please point me there and I'll be grateful (I did skip over a few pages of this thread).
Bookmarks