+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 17 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 162
Fda approval! in Campaigning; Originally Posted by TropicalBob This has all been rehashed (pun intended) in the past on this forum. Read the FDA ...
  1. #31
    Myk
    Myk is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IL, USA
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
    This has all been rehashed (pun intended) in the past on this forum. Read the FDA papers on Nicowater. One kind is allowed. Gabby is correct in her summation.
    This is not water. Water is a food, nicotine is not a food additive and they were marketing the nicotine water as NRT, and they were using a drug form of nicotine. That clearly puts it in the jurisdiction of the FDA.
    As long as the nicotine in e-liquid is not a drug form and qualified for NRT (which is why it was turned down as NRT) it is not a drug. They would have to do like AU did and reclassify which would extend to other forms of nicotine like cigarettes.
    The FDA has tried to get their hands on tobacco as a drug and they lost.
    Nicotine water has been reformulated and is now marketed as a tobacco product.

    I don't care if it's been rehashed a million times if those million times were wrong.

    I know what went on with ephedra. I know what went on with the FDA and tobacco. I know what went on with the FDA and nicotine water. I know what the most recent refusal by the FDA over e-liquid was about.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #32
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    401

    Default

    Ok here is a thought... has ANYONE ever really tested that there juice or cartridge has nicotine in it? where is the proof that nicotine is in our juice? just cause you say you feel it doesnt mean it is in there.. could be a placebo effect.

  4. #33
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL USA
    Posts
    5,624

    Default

    Did you read the rejection of E-Cig's petition to the FDA? It's a "new drug", the FDA said in rejecting it. If it's a new drug, it will be rejected. If it's an existing drug, it will be medicinal and both liquids and delivery devices will be subject to regulation as medicines are. That's what Gabby was concluding.

    And she's right. It's lose-lose.

  5. #34
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    65

    Default

    A correction to my post above; that is EU law, not Irish law. The Irish law is exactly the same, however.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rockbassray View Post
    Ok here is a thought... has ANYONE ever really tested that there juice or cartridge has nicotine in it? where is the proof that nicotine is in our juice? just cause you say you feel it doesnt mean it is in there.. could be a placebo effect.
    Nicotine has been shown to have a demonstrable effect compared to placebo. the Ruyan paper from Health New Zealand also shows that there is nicotine in the cartridges, as has the assay of Totally Wicked E-Juice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Myk
    They would have to do like AU did and reclassify which would extend to other forms of nicotine like cigarettes.
    I'm interested to know what you mean by this. Do you mean that if legislation regulated nicotine, such a regulation would have to extend to tobacco?

  6. #35
    Myk
    Myk is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IL, USA
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
    Did you read the rejection of E-Cig's petition to the FDA? It's a "new drug", the FDA said in rejecting it. If it's a new drug, it will be rejected. If it's an existing drug, it will be medicinal and both liquids and delivery devices will be subject to regulation as medicines are. That's what Gabby was concluding.

    And she's right. It's lose-lose.
    Geez, it's a new drug because it was put to them as NRT but doesn't contain old drugs approved as NRT.
    If it's not put to them as NRT they have no real jurisdiction, although I'm sure they will try.
    If it's kept as a tobacco product and a smoking alternative they have no jurisdiction other than to try and claim it's not a tobacco product in order to get jurisdiction.
    The easy answer is for everyone in this country to stop claiming it's NRT and simply say it's a safer way to use tobacco.

    Maybe you'll find this FDA link educational,
    On March 21, 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lacks the authority to regulate tobacco. Therefore, FDA no longer maintains its Children and Tobacco Website.
    Tobacco Redirect Information

  7. #36
    Myk
    Myk is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IL, USA
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nqhqhz View Post
    I'm interested to know what you mean by this. Do you mean that if legislation regulated nicotine, such a regulation would have to extend to tobacco?
    As far as I can tell the nicotine in e-liquid is taken from plants, there are other "essences" from tobacco.
    That is not drug form nicotine, it is a form of tobacco. The FDA cannot regulate tobacco without getting the law changed.

    China's problem is they claim it is NRT in their country and ship that around with their product. They also tried to get it approved here as NRT.
    I imagine that claim will have to stop.

  8. #37
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,233

    Default

    How about this, Johnson Creek have FDA approval - nicotine liquid is ok -

    Quote Originally Posted by LaceyUnderall View Post
    Kate - update: I just received confirmation from the President of JC that the FDA approval is for both the facility and the product.
    http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...html#post81426

    True or false ... would Johnson Creek lie?

  9. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Southern U.S.
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Registered is not the same as having approval. I've seen it discussed here but I'll be damned if I can locate it in quick time. I'm betting TB knows.

  10. #39
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL USA
    Posts
    5,624

    Default

    Here's some more bad news: Congress this term will vote on legislation to give the FDA specific authority it now lacks over tobacco. The bills are virtually assured of passage, with overwhelming support.

    Read;

    Congress should end this special protection for Big Tobacco by passing legislation to give the FDA authority to regulate tobacco products. The public health community strongly supports bipartisan bills that have been introduced in Congress:

    S. 625 sponsored by Senators Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and John Cornyn (R-TX).

    H.R. 1108 sponsored by Representatives Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Tom Davis (R-VA).

    This legislation would:

    Crack down on tobacco marketing and sales to kids.

    Require larger, more effective health warnings on tobacco products.

    Require tobacco companies to disclose the contents of tobacco products, changes to their products and research about the health effects of the products.

    Grant the FDA authority to require changes in tobacco products, such as the removal or reduction of harmful ingredients.

    Ban candy-flavored cigarettes.

    Prohibit terms such as "light", "mild" and "low-tar" that mislead consumers into believing that certain cigarettes are safer.

    Prohibit health claims about so-called “reduced risk” products that are not scientifically proven or that would discourage current tobacco users from quitting or encourage new users to start.

    This legislation has been co-sponsored by a majority of both the House and the Senate. It has been endorsed by more than 680 public health, faith and other organizations across the country. And it is supported by 70 percent of American voters.
    The big deal is not just FDA taking jurisdiction from the old ATF agency, but the fact that the FDA is likely to impose heavy restriction on how much "addictive" nicotine will be allowed per cigarette. Makers would be required to market only non-addictive smokes. Lotta pleasure there, eh?

    I suppose the real horror here is the number supporting this transfer of power. The efforts to pass this began after a court said the FDA did not have authority over tobacco.

    It soon will!

  11. #40
    Myk
    Myk is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    IL, USA
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
    Here's some more bad news: Congress this term will vote on legislation to give the FDA specific authority it now lacks over tobacco. The bills are virtually assured of passage, with overwhelming support.

    Read;



    The big deal is not just FDA taking jurisdiction from the old ATF agency, but the fact that the FDA is likely to impose heavy restriction on how much "addictive" nicotine will be allowed per cigarette. Makers would be required to market only non-addictive smokes. Lotta pleasure there, eh?

    I suppose the real horror here is the number supporting this transfer of power. The efforts to pass this began after a court said the FDA did not have authority over tobacco.

    It soon will!
    That could be a problem. It was a Republican Congress who told the FDA no before the Supreme Court decision and now we're back to Democrats.

    I assume the SCOTUS decision was about internal laws and not Constitutional since there is no FDA, BATFE or tobacco in the Constitution.

    But that was a previous session. It was rushed through the House and seems to have died in the Senate.
    No more actions taken after August, they probably were trying to keep their jobs and taking away people's addictions close to an election is not a good way to do that.
    So they act like they are for something to get the anti's on their side and then don't follow through to keep the pro's with them.
    Last edited by Myk; 01-07-2009 at 10:48 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 17 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO