+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 127
12 days left before the ban of sales in CA! in Campaigning; I sent one appealing to spirit of freedom of choice etc We'll see what happens One voice doesn't make much ...
  1. #11
    PV Master Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    RIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Marianna Florida,( in the woods) I'M A GIRL!!
    Posts
    4,826

    Default

    I sent one appealing to spirit of freedom of choice etc We'll see what happens One voice doesn't make much noice, but many voices together can roar



    RIMP
    "IT'S ALL SMALL STUFF"
    SMOKE FREE SINCE 8/16/09

    LavaCorps Peeps Rock!!




  2. Advertisement
  3. #12
    Full Member ECF Veteran jnakamura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sad Society View Post
    I know this will be banning sales in CA, but does it mean that it will be illegal to use and have in CA as well?
    No. Possession and use will not be affected.

  4. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    So. Cal
    Posts
    169

    Default

    I sent en E-mail as well! I figure it may not help, but all we can do is try! If we get enough people to send them, I'm sure Arnie will at least catch wind that there will be a lot of unhappy people should this become law!

  5. #14
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    100

    Default

    Yes, it will be affected.

    They are trying to place Nicotine-Bearing Liquid into the realm of prescription-only. This would mean that only FDA approved eLiquid would be allowed to be sold or purchased in the state, and anyone caught with it would be subject to enforcement for handling a prescription product without a prescription.

    Regarding non-nicotine liquid, if passed, then expect any run ins with good old Johnny Law to figure they can not be sure if it has or does not have nicotine content, which in turn can lead to arrest and detainment until such time as they prove you were not handling a prescription product.

  6. #15
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Glendale, Az
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Thanks for the info Þornbjörg, I sent mine through. Good luck Cali.

    - R0b

  7. #16
    Ultra Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Princessdee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    1,842

    Default

    sent. Also had hubby send.
    Hope it helps ~ P

  8. #17
    Super Member ECF Veteran Sad Society's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    503

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Þornbjörg View Post
    Yes, it will be affected.

    They are trying to place Nicotine-Bearing Liquid into the realm of prescription-only. This would mean that only FDA approved eLiquid would be allowed to be sold or purchased in the state, and anyone caught with it would be subject to enforcement for handling a prescription product without a prescription.

    Regarding non-nicotine liquid, if passed, then expect any run ins with good old Johnny Law to figure they can not be sure if it has or does not have nicotine content, which in turn can lead to arrest and detainment until such time as they prove you were not handling a prescription product.
    Then expect other States to follow as well. CA sets the example and then others follow and then nicotine juice will be illegal in the U.S.

  9. #18
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran cliff5550's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Central Illinois - USA
    Posts
    1,209

    Default

    We emailed our message to the governor. Hope it helps. Illinois could be next if California folds.
    We us the Ego-T
    Not one cigarette since July 1, 2009!
    www.willieandtheblueshounds.com

  10. #19
    Full Member ECF Veteran jnakamura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Þornbjörg View Post
    Yes, it will be affected.

    They are trying to place Nicotine-Bearing Liquid into the realm of prescription-only. This would mean that only FDA approved eLiquid would be allowed to be sold or purchased in the state, and anyone caught with it would be subject to enforcement for handling a prescription product without a prescription.
    There's quite a grey area there. Suppose the FDA banned a certain OTC cold medicine and made it available by prescription only. Would you be arrested if you still had possession of it if it was the version bought legally OTC before the ban?

    If you can prove that you bought your e-liquid legally before the ban then I don't see how it would be illegal. Are you suggesting that they realistically would order an edict that all e-liquid that was legally purchased must be turned in to the police or destroyed by the individuals who purchased it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Þornbjörg View Post
    Regarding non-nicotine liquid, if passed, then expect any run ins with good old Johnny Law to figure they can not be sure if it has or does not have nicotine content, which in turn can lead to arrest and detainment until such time as they prove you were not handling a prescription product.
    Again this a quite a grey area. Are you suggesting that you could be legally arrested and detained for the possession of flavored Vegetable Glycerin for personal use?

  11. #20
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Þornbjörg View Post
    Yes, it will be affected.

    They are trying to place Nicotine-Bearing Liquid into the realm of prescription-only. This would mean that only FDA approved eLiquid would be allowed to be sold or purchased in the state, and anyone caught with it would be subject to enforcement for handling a prescription product without a prescription.
    What? Where are you getting this from? It's not part of SB400 as I read it. Is there another bill in the works?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO