![]() |
| | ||||||
| Notices |
| Law and the E-Cigarette Discuss the laws that govern the sale of e-cigarettes where you live. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 |
| Supporting Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: North Florida,( in the woods)
Posts: 775
|
I sent one appealing to spirit of freedom of choice etc We'll see what happens One voice doesn't make much noice, but many voices together can roar![]() RIMP
__________________ IT'S ALL SMALL STUFF" SMOKE FREE SINCE 8/16/09 |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Full Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 65
| No. Possession and use will not be affected.
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: So. Cal
Posts: 200
|
I sent en E-mail as well! I figure it may not help, but all we can do is try! If we get enough people to send them, I'm sure Arnie will at least catch wind that there will be a lot of unhappy people should this become law!
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Full Member |
Yes, it will be affected. They are trying to place Nicotine-Bearing Liquid into the realm of prescription-only. This would mean that only FDA approved eLiquid would be allowed to be sold or purchased in the state, and anyone caught with it would be subject to enforcement for handling a prescription product without a prescription. Regarding non-nicotine liquid, if passed, then expect any run ins with good old Johnny Law to figure they can not be sure if it has or does not have nicotine content, which in turn can lead to arrest and detainment until such time as they prove you were not handling a prescription product.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Full Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Glendale, Az
Posts: 96
|
Thanks for the info Þornbjörg, I sent mine through. Good luck Cali. - R0b |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: PA, USA
Posts: 272
|
sent. Also had hubby send. Hope it helps ~ P |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 202
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: West Central Illinois - USA
Posts: 280
|
We emailed our message to the governor. Hope it helps. Illinois could be next if California folds.
|
| | |
| | #19 | ||
| Full Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 65
| Quote:
If you can prove that you bought your e-liquid legally before the ban then I don't see how it would be illegal. Are you suggesting that they realistically would order an edict that all e-liquid that was legally purchased must be turned in to the police or destroyed by the individuals who purchased it? Quote:
__________________ ![]() | ||
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Supporting Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 130
| Quote:
__________________ Janet "The standard for lower-risk products for use by current smokers," argues the American Association of Public Health Physicians, "should be the hazard posed by cigarettes, not a pharmaceutical safety standard." Telling smokers they may not use e-cigarettes until they're approved by the FDA is like telling a floundering swimmer not to climb aboard a raft because it might have a leak. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|