check this out !..A free test for electronic cigarettes ? in Campaigning; weird huh? it comes at a time when many states are doubling taxes on cigarettes in a bid to pad ...
-
Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
weird huh? it comes at a time when many states are doubling taxes on cigarettes in a bid to pad their coffers in these hard times and when arizona has recently had to pull anti somking ads on tv even though they paid $2 million to produce them because they say they need the money for other things. the government loves tobacco. Check - the government relies on tobacco users for revenue. Well I wrote to them so i'll be interested in seeing their response.
Maybe i am optimistic but the grant was for any group who wanted to test whether smokeless tobacco products or tobacco products that are classified as less harmful are actually less harmful. I think we could have got a university to agree to test e-cigs and this grant would have supported their tests and added legitimacy to e-smoking.
The university could have been anywhere in the world and could have been completely independent from the US gov. I think proper tests would proove that e-cigs are less dangerous than real cigarettes and maybe more. I think they would have given us a grant.
The agencies behind the grant were The National Institutes of Health, The National Cancer Institute and The National Institute on Drug Abuse. In my opinion, the only sinister thing about the grant was the fact that it was pulled.
Last edited by dc2k08; 12-12-2008 at 07:32 PM.
-
Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
TB is right... they want all or nothing. In searching the NIA website, they appear to only have results that tell you smoking is bad. I think they are honestly afraid that nicotine does actually have some good qualities to it and they have fallen into the prohibition trap.
Researchers Light Up for Nicotine, the Wonder Drug - really good article if you haven't come across this one.
-
Like most if not all chemicals, nicotine has good and bad effects. If the good outweigh the bad, we're doing a very good thing, especially coupling the germ-killing impact of inhaled PG with the nicotine benefits.
But here's the part of that report that worries me a bit:
"There will be a variety of nicotine-based drugs coming out," agrees Ed Levin, a nicotine researcher at Duke University, who's done groundbreaking research on improving mental function in schizophrenia, Alzheimer's patients and people with ADHA. Levin believes the drugs are something to look forward to.
"There will be great progress when the nicotine sister drugs come to market," he says. "About half the cigarettes in this country are bought by people with psychiatric problems -- high percentages of people with depression and schizophrenia smoke, for example.
"When we can give people their medicine in a form that doesn't kill them, it will be real progress."
If nicotine is a medicine, guess who gets to regulate it? The FDA. And if the FDA has clear authority over that substance, will it approve it in the present form? Stuff from China without so much as an ingredient list? Untested? In vials without childproofing? With bubble wrap packaging? And if it's a drug, what will the cost become of that drug we addicts need to vaporize? Will it be prescription-only?
I'm still trying to see a smooth road into the future where we can continue to e-smoke without fear of either legal or health consequences. To me, not much else matters, like puffs per cart, etc. Law and science alone will determine our future. I don't see a smooth road ahead.
-
Ultra Member
ECF Veteran

Originally Posted by
TropicalBob
I'm still trying to see a smooth road into the future where we can continue to e-smoke without fear of either legal or health consequences. To me, not much else matters, like puffs per cart, etc. Law and science alone will determine our future. I don't see a smooth road ahead.
Very good questions. I am sure the tobacco companies will ensure that it is their profit. And you are probably right... the road will be very bumpy... sadly.
-
Lacey, I honestly don't believe Big Tobacco cares about moving into this market. They don't manufacture electronic products. This is not for them. They make tobacco products. They are moving to snus and smokeless tobacco products. They are not going to rebrand and resell a Chinese toy. At worst, they will become involved to ask government agencies to tax us exactly as tobacco products are taxed. Maybe $1.30 per cartridge in tax alone. (Liquid will likely be banned altogether, forbidden as a toxic poison.)
Big Pharma doesn't care either, except to ask government to make our nicotine pushers meet the same regulations and criteria that all NRT products must meet. That means years of study, delayed products, and millions of dollars that must be spent on testing and certification of safety and efficacy. Who will pay for those tests? The government doesn't do them. Companies do them. Big Pharma has paid plenty to get NRT products on the market. They offer products with approved nicotine; e-smoking offers products with unregulated nicotine. See a problem? Big Pharma will want e-nicotine to pay the same as was done for other non-tobacco, nicotine products.
E-smokers need to get past the idea that Big Tobacco or Big Pharma is an answer. Neither is likely to jump on the e-smoking bandwagon. Both are likely to fight e-smoking from behind the scenes (nothing to be gained by a public fight).
Finally, don't expect government to promote e-smoking for its "health" benefits. Those are unproven. They don't exist. "Common sense" isn't evidence. And if governments in many places see a threat to tobacco taxes, then alternatives to tobacco will be regulated almost out of existence. That's us!
Health groups say "quit or die." Government says "quit or pay." The choice is ours.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of a happy road to a glorious e-smoking future, if anyone can articulate it. In the meantime, enjoy the moment.
-
u guys worry about e cig legalities.. me.. i worry about the entire US economy imploding in upon itself and taking the rest of the world down with it...
still.. i have been accused of always taking the "negative" view..
best i go away hey bob.. ???
somehow i think e smoking and health problems aint gonna figure much in the grand scheme of things during the next few months..
simple US protectionism is probably the biggest threat to e smoking... no-ey import-ey stuff-ey from chin-ey.. possibly followed by world war three.. he he
black dark humour.. could be.. but then again... he he
trog
-
Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
a few months Trog ? i envision myself smoking electronically for longer than two months and would like to seek ways to protect my hobby in the long run. if these take off, which they will and Big Med take notice, you just know they are going to be claiming x,y and z to get them black-listed. The smoking cessation market is one of their most dynamic. it would be handy to have some legitimate counter evidence in motion.
Yeah, the economy is a threat, especially for the sterling and we can read about the continuing riots in chinese factories, governments increasing tobacco taxes to make up their revenue. There are lots of factors to think about. It's not a bad idea to discuss them all.
Dark humor > check this:
Nerf factory riot in China
-

Originally Posted by
dc2k08
a few months Trog ? i envision myself smoking electronically for longer than two months and would like to seek ways to protect my hobby in the long run. if these take off, which they will and Big Med take notice, you just know they are going to be claiming x,y and z to get them black-listed. The smoking cessation market is one of their most dynamic. it would be handy to have some legitimate counter evidence in motion.
Yeah, the economy is a threat, especially for the sterling and we can read about the continuing riots in chinese factories, governments increasing tobacco taxes to make up their revenue. There are lots of factors to think about. It's not a bad idea to discuss them all.
Dark humor > check this:
Nerf factory riot in China
taking the real dire worse case scenario view DC..
a question of priorities.. to worry about long term health problems from real cigs.. u have to be sure of short term things like not starving.. being robbed or more important things...
we do kinda take some things for granted.. they did give out free packets of players to the troops a while back.. its all a question of priorities..
will you p-ss off dude.. i really do have to get these deckchair sorted.. i dont have time for your babble about bloody iceburgs
just imagine a soldier in the trenches telling his mate to put his fag out they can damage your health.. or the unforgettable last requested.. the cig being placed in the dying soldiers mouth by the still alive hero.. and of course the look of gratitude on the poor sods face.. he he
somehow i cant imagine an e cig being offered to the blindfolded prisoner about to be shot either.. the f-cking batteries would go flat... he he
my humour gets worse.. i aint surprized it goes over the heads of most..
but it is question of priorities and priorities can change.. i expect a lot of them to be doing just this shortly..
trog
-
Supplier
ECF Veteran
ECF Veteran
I honestly believe that the big tobacco and pharmaceutical companies are already aware of the threat, albeit small as yet, of e-smoking. In the UK tobacco products are being forced under the counter by legislation, they will not be allowed to be in public view (stupid I know but that debate's too tiresome). What's going to fill the space? The big companies will either produce their own tested and licenced e-cig product and squeeze government into outlawing unlicenced ones, or they will simply buy out the key e-cig companies around the world because they have the funds to do it. I don't honestly think that they will just do nothing.
The idea of doing a study is fine, but it has to be credible and clinically controlled to be of any value. In the UK it would cost at least a six figure sum (yes in excess of 100,000 GBP) to conduct trials to a level that would have a chance of gaining a product licence as a smoking cessation aid. The trials would take between 12 and 18 months to complete, during which time the product being tested cannot be sold, now that is a biggie!
So Mr B&H, if you would like to offer us in excess of 20 million we might be able to open negotiations! 
Cheers.
John.
-
So Mr B&H, if you would like to offer us in excess of 20 million we might be able to open negotiations!
i wonder if it will happen.. every man has his price or so they say.. i remember skol bandits.. perhaps mr big lets mr not so big get product acceptance before stepping in or buying out....
trog
ps... god u are an ugly bugger... he he he
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
Bookmarks