+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36
Santa Rosa Sheriff's Department Outlaws...Tobacco? in Campaigning; Being from Pensacola, I can honestly say this doesn't surprise me in the least. My roommate was going to go ...
  1. #21
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Okeechobee, Florida, United States
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Being from Pensacola, I can honestly say this doesn't surprise me in the least. My roommate was going to go through the police academy and they told him 6 months without tobacco of any sort, I thought "They're nuts. Isn't that illegal?" Guess not. One of the many reasons I can't wait to vacate this stupid state. When I lived in Pensacola, I had to cover up my tattoos, remove my piercings and cut my hair to even get considered for a job, and now they're discriminating based on tobacco use? SMFH.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #22
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran LaceyUnderall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    USA and Canada
    Posts
    2,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Allestaria View Post
    The policy states smoking tobacco or tobacco related products.
    What is most interesting in these situations is that this also includes all of the NRT's, which do contain nicotine.

    In researching this, here is what I have found:

    There is an organization that focuses primarily on helping private businesses (and obviously now government) lower their insurance costs. They are aligning themselves with local "health" businesses that do the same.

    What they are doing, is in a way, back door prohibition of nicotine.

    Basically, what happens is that the health insurance providers jack up their rates and then the small business goes to these organizations, pays them a fee to help them to get their employees to comply with certain lifestyle choices and then their insurance rates go back down to a "reasonable" rate.

    We all know that prohibition from a government level does not work... so it appears that they are forcing prohibition of nicotine through the private business sector.

    This main organization that I am referring to is CBCA Administrators and on one of their documents I found on the web, they clearly state that if your employee wants to quit smoking, if they fill out the proper paper work, CBCA will provide them with Chantix, free of charge. They aren't even hawking the NRT's. Just the Chantix.

    This IS nicotine prohibition from what I can tell. And it isn't illegal because they are using a back door through the private sector. Especially in states that are still "at will" employment states. You have the right to choose where you work, even though the main argument in the smoking bans is that people don't have the right to choose where they work.

    Welcome to CBCA Administrators, Inc.
    Last edited by LaceyUnderall; 10-27-2009 at 03:56 PM.
    e-smoker 4eva

  4. #23
    Inactive Supplier
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    275

    Default

    Well the obvious answer to this is to have people start paying their own insurance.

    That is the beef here for the employers. They are basically saying 'if we are paying for your medical care, you're going to stop doing things that make it so expensive'. Their insurance costs no doubt go way down if they are insuring a bunch of non-smokers, so you cant really blame them.

  5. #24
    CASAA Activist ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Vocalek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield, VA
    Posts
    5,136
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Jim Hagedorn, Scotts Miracle-Gro's chief executive officer of Scott's Miracle-Gro isn't charging higher premiums. He is firing current employees who don't quit smoking.

    Online Extra: Hagedorn: "We Care About Our People"

    My view is we choose not to employ smokers because it comes right down to us saying that as a culture we care about our people and we are not going to tolerate suicidal behavior. If we had somebody running around saying I'm going to commit suicide, we'd call an ambulance and take them away. They have a problem and they need help. To me, what I think is missing in this debate about wellness is that it is O.K. for a company to say we care about our people, and we choose not to have our folks behave in a way that's going to be heartbreaking.
    So, it's OK, because he is denying them employment "for their own good."

    The company can legally fire smokers in 21 states. “We’re being as aggressive as the law will allow us, to keep our costs under control,” Hagedorn said."


    --------
    ------- Support CASAA - http://www.casaa.org/support/ ---

  6. #25
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran sherid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canton, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,998

    Default

    I find it despicable that the same insurance companies who demand that smokers pay more also make hundreds of millions of dollars from their investments in tobacco stock.
    "Deja Moo : The feeling you’ve heard this bull before !"

  7. #26
    Super Member ECF Veteran SheerLuckHolmes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tempe, Az
    Posts
    822

    Default

    I am so happy that I bought my own franchise business. No do-gooders trying to control me to confrom to their vision of correctness. I used to be proud to be an American, born in the land of the free. No more, it just ain't the same place anymore.

  8. #27
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Oregon USA
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vocalek View Post
    Jim Hagedorn, Scotts Miracle-Gro's chief executive officer of Scott's Miracle-Gro isn't charging higher premiums. He is firing current employees who don't quit smoking.




    So, it's OK, because he is denying them employment "for their own good."

    The company can legally fire smokers in 21 states. “We’re being as aggressive as the law will allow us, to keep our costs under control,” Hagedorn said."

    I wonder if there products end up in the tobacco?

  9. #28
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaMulta View Post
    OK this is funny kinda.

    You can pass the Nicotine test with the same stuff they use to fake the test for pot. It also looks like it stays in your system the same amount of time that pot does.
    Don't know about that, but I did read an article about a UK study where they were analyzing stored nicotine in toenail clippings (i guess because toenails grow so slowly). From that study, it seems nicotine (or a marker for nicotine) is stored in the body, and if it's in toenails, it's in your hair also. So I don't see a way around fooling any test unless your bald I guess. lol

  10. #29
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I'm from Santa Rosa.. and can def say that they should allow the cops to smoke...the need to relax a bit just like us!

    Then again here in Cali...we have ratcheted down on smoking in public places pretty hard...that's why I Vape!! no one seems to mind here once I tell them what I'm doing...they think it hella cool... Smokers and Non-smokers alike..

  11. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Milton FL
    Posts
    12

    Default

    this is just the start, we gave up owe rights long ago, soon you will have to go to a government approved church. Ron Paul was the best choice for president. go read George Orwell 1984

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO