+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
My Personal Opinion on FDA and Ecigs in Campaigning; I find it interesting that tobacco cigarettes are FDA approved, yet the FDA has created controversy that runs both hot ...
  1. #1
    Senior Member ECF Veteran pigelty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    157

    Default My Personal Opinion on FDA and Ecigs

    I find it interesting that tobacco cigarettes are FDA approved, yet the FDA has created controversy that runs both hot and cold regarding the safety of ecigs.

    Now,regular cigs contain horrible chemicals used in rat poison, welding substances, etc, etc. The ecig contains minute quantities of LESS harmful chemicals.

    And in regards to PG in ecigs, from what I read, PG is in pharm medicines, foods and even condoms. Hence the fact PG is used in fireman training, theaters, clubs, etc where ppl inhale up to 50 gallons!

    Ecigs are just a safer alternative. Ban sales to minors, warn the public of possible side effects and be done with it!

    Actully, if I were in a position of political power and business, approving ecigs could actually create big markets...especially in the pharm dept Ecig sales have drastically increased in the past year.

    With that in mind, who are they kidding that they are concerned with our health? They care about money and control, brought on by addiction and social acceptance.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #2
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran emus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,241

    Default

    Who's gonna pay the multimillion sin taxes if ecigs catch on...
    Somebody would have to makeup the difference.
    I'd let the french fry eaters foot the sin tax bill for awhile.

  4. #3
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    209

    Default

    LOL! It is my understanding that the government does want to put an extra tax on stuff that is fattening. What next, huh?

    I hate government regulation as much as anybody (if not more so!). However, there is a need to ensure product safety for stuff that is ingested. For example, I read a report (posted here somewhere) about a case where stuff--like cough syrup--was contaminated with the anti-freeze chemical and people died. We certainly don't want that to happen to any of us!

    At the same time, we know e-cigs have been studied and approved by a company in New Zealand and a company (if not the NHS) in the UK. Why can't the FDA just take their word for it until proper testing procedures and standards can be put in place here?

    I see no need for the FDA to go about banning stuff willy nilly because the drug companies and/or big tobacco can't stand the competition. THAT is crap. Indeed, THAT is corruption.

  5. #4
    Senior Member* ECF Veteran rickghouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    109

    Default

    To put is simply, the FDA is in bed with Big Pharma & Big Tobacco. Our health is a non-issue with them. Tobacco tax revenue is at stake.

    When they figure out how to add massive taxes to e-liquids, all of a sudden they will be in favor of e-cigs!

    The FDA are a bunch of sactamonious, self-righteous b@$tards who obviously don't give a rat's bottom about our health.

    Rick.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO