View Poll Results: What requirements should the FDA put on e-liquid?

Voters
76. You may not vote on this poll
  • Childproof caps

    59 77.63%
  • Prominent poison warnings on label

    58 76.32%
  • Ingredient listings on label

    60 78.95%
  • 3rd party analysis results available

    33 43.42%
  • Batch testing performed and certified

    39 51.32%
  • Restriction of sale to minors

    61 80.26%
  • Expiration date on label

    56 73.68%
  • Manufacturer listed on label

    47 61.84%
  • pH level listed on label

    10 13.16%
  • Nicotine concentration in standardized format [mg/ml] listed on label

    65 85.53%
  • Safety pamphlet in box (dosing, interaction, OD treatment info)

    49 64.47%
  • None at all

    5 6.58%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 26 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 256
Why shouldn't the FDA interfere? in Campaigning; i'm in the dark about this stuff too and i have no idea how it all will end, but i ...
  1. #31
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    545

    Default

    i'm in the dark about this stuff too and i have no idea how it all will end, but i am fairly certain of one thing.

    the day a child drinks some of this liquid and gets sick, or worse, it's going to be game over.
    i think it's inexcusable that all this liquid isn't in child proof packaging.

    just my opinion

  2. Advertisement
  3. #32
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CandyGirl View Post
    i'm in the dark about this stuff too and i have no idea how it all will end, but i am fairly certain of one thing.

    the day a child drinks some of this liquid and gets sick, or worse, it's going to be game over.
    i think it's inexcusable that all this liquid isn't in child proof packaging.

    just my opinion
    I can't tell you how much I agree with this. The way the juice is currently packaged and shipped is BEGGING for a tragedy. It's been raised many times and most of the suppliers on this forum remain silent.

    Kudos to JC for showing a bit of responsibility.

  4. #33
    PV Master ECF Veteran Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    West Allis, WI
    Posts
    3,945
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CandyGirl View Post

    the day a child drinks some of this liquid and gets sick, or worse, it's going to be game over.
    i think it's inexcusable that all this liquid isn't in child proof packaging.

    just my opinion

    I agree 1000% - anyone with kids or pets should keep this locked up in a VERY secure location! Child proofing the containers will be tops on the FDA list, IMO.
    Vapefest II - St. Louis - We Came, We Saw, We VAPED!www.vapefest.com

    ONE purpose, ONE goal, ONE MILLION voices raised with ONE message! - Our right to VAPE!

  5. #34
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    399

    Default

    most people don't have the sense to "do the right thing" until it becomes law (eg not smoking in the car with small children).

    applying that to the people who make a living as suppliers, where this would also cost them money, i can totally see why most have been silent on the subject.

    it always comes down to the bottom line; and some suppliers (people) are willing to make that extra dollar rather than do the right thing until uncle sam forces them to. or shuts them down. we shall see.

  6. #35
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran strayling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Seattle, USA
    Posts
    1,064

    Default

    Aren't we getting just a little panicky here? I've got a little bottle of tincture of iodine which looks just like the e-juice bottles and nobody bats an eye at those (and many other poisons) being sold in that sort of packaging. Sure, making the bottles childproof is a good idea but no more so than lots of other household poisons.

  7. #36
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    399

    Default

    strayling i see your point and i'm in total agreement with it.

    the difference, in my opinion, is while the realistic risks may be the same between iodine and e-liquid when improperly consumed; this is not the logic of the average citizen nor most governing bodies.

    what were dealing with in eliquid is not a run of the mill household cleanser or wound treatment, its a component to a new and generally untested controvertial product, the electronic cigarette.

    so while the potential of harm may be similar to other household products, again in my opinion, its smart business to be ahead of the game rather than risk the consequences later given the situation.

  8. #37
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by strayling View Post
    Aren't we getting just a little panicky here? I've got a little bottle of tincture of iodine which looks just like the e-juice bottles and nobody bats an eye at those (and many other poisons) being sold in that sort of packaging. Sure, making the bottles childproof is a good idea but no more so than lots of other household poisons.
    Not sure on how toxic tincture of iodine is but I do know in Canada most toxic substances use proper packaging.

    Here is an example: I recently got a 50ml bottle of Cash Cola in the mail. The bottle just says Coca Cola on it with no poison label or warning labels anywhere. The cap is easy access. Imagine a child comes along and sees a bottle with Coca Cola on it, decides he is going to take a drink, but being a clever child he opens and smells it. Well..it smells just like Coca Cola. One good sip and the child is dead.

    I happen to know how dangerous this liquid is but there was no warnings included in the package for other parents. It boggles my mind that something so dangerous is treated so caviler. It is inevitable that children will die needlessly for the sake of a few pennies and to be honest it REALLY pisses me off. We all feign such concern over the FDA but allow suppliers on this board to skate by with irresponsible packaging.
    Last edited by Nuck; 03-15-2009 at 03:02 AM. Reason: To save Mother Earth

  9. #38
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    LI NY
    Posts
    624

    Default

    I keep my juice in my medicine cabinet far out of reach of the lil ones, I dont really know what is in it and I would hate to find out the Hard way. just one mans opinion

  10. #39
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran strayling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Seattle, USA
    Posts
    1,064

    Default

    I see where everyone's coming from and I do agree that childproof packaging is the way to go for the liquids. I commented mainly because I see everyone getting very defensive and a siege mentality would be counter-productive IMO. We need to remember that we aren't doing anything wrong and that

    Actually, I'd be more worried about a child swallowing a cartridge than drinking the liquid. That stuff tastes *nasty* as anyone who's accidentally sucked in a drop can attest and it would take a very determined person to swallow any. Carts, on the other hand, could be swallowed whole ...

    Nuck, the lethal dose for iodine can be as low as 200mg so there's plenty in one of those little bottles to do serious damage. It was just the first example which sprang to mind so don't read too much into my referring to it.

    Tone, I agree that a medicine cabinet is a sensible place to store liquids and carts in a house where there are children.

    Elle, I get what you mean about logic going out the window. That's why presenting information calmly and rationally is our best tactic to win widespread acceptance for our hobby/habit.

  11. #40
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    AL, USA
    Posts
    269

    Default

    It is inevitable that children will die needlessly for the sake of a few pennies and to be honest it REALLY pisses me off.

    And your buying from and supporting these child killing suppliers? Sorry, but if I truely felt that way I would run as far away from this site and e-juice as I could get.

    I could go on and on about what "might" kill a child this year. over 300 children die every year in swimming pool related accidents, but people still buy them (have one myself).

    "in Canada most toxic substances use proper packaging."

    Just last year a 2 year old little boy died from drinking nail polish remover and rubbing alcohol. Neither of those products had (and still dont have) child proof caps. You should check your bathroom. I would dare to guess that your rubbing alcohol and fingernail polish remover are not in childproof containers. I could really go on and on with this. There are many dangers lurking in and around our homes.

    Nuck - I don't disagree with you about warning labels and child proof caps, just think about what you are saying. There are many toxic substances out there that we must protect ourself and our children from.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 26 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO