View Poll Results: What requirements should the FDA put on e-liquid?

Voters
76. You may not vote on this poll
  • Childproof caps

    59 77.63%
  • Prominent poison warnings on label

    58 76.32%
  • Ingredient listings on label

    60 78.95%
  • 3rd party analysis results available

    33 43.42%
  • Batch testing performed and certified

    39 51.32%
  • Restriction of sale to minors

    61 80.26%
  • Expiration date on label

    56 73.68%
  • Manufacturer listed on label

    47 61.84%
  • pH level listed on label

    10 13.16%
  • Nicotine concentration in standardized format [mg/ml] listed on label

    65 85.53%
  • Safety pamphlet in box (dosing, interaction, OD treatment info)

    49 64.47%
  • None at all

    5 6.58%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 26 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 256
Why shouldn't the FDA interfere? in Campaigning; Agree with Tropical Bob - right to vape + duty to remove the dubious....
  1. #51
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,054

    Default

    Agree with Tropical Bob - right to vape + duty to remove the dubious.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #52
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,233

    Default

    I can't remember the exact quote but I read this years ago:

    'The difference between a tragedy and a comedy is that in a comedy the characters work out the plot before it's too late.'

    Working out scenarios and making plans to avoid potential tragic events (risk assessment) is the best way to end up having a laugh.


    http://www.creativity-engineering.com/comtrag.html

  4. #53
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL USA
    Posts
    5,624

    Default

    I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry!

    I am sure you're not arguing for continuing a lack of knowledge. Is this a test, teacher? I choose comedy.

  5. #54
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,233

    Default

    Oh, sorry TBob.

    I'm not really arguing about anything to be honest. Reading this thread made me feel a bit philosophical and reminded me of that quote I read long ago.

    It seems to me that we go back and forth between comedy and tragedy with our discussions and I guess I'd rather we end up laughing.

    Maybe in a way I'm agreeing with the points made to reduce risks by improving packaging and safety measures.

    Sorry I was a bit obscure

  6. #55
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Where in the Constitution of the United States does it state that it is the government's responsibility to protect us from ourselves? The American people have been slowly giving up their rights for the past few decades that they are used to it. They want a Big Brother to take care of them.
    Examples: Although I use these devices by choice, are seatbelt laws, motorcycle helmet laws, etc.. Situations where I am endangering only myself, no one else!
    In matters like these you have a choice; go back to analogs, chew some Nicorette, put on a patch, but don't infringe on my rights!
    Benjamin Franklin said it best, I think:

    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

  7. #56
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    You confuse your right to risk your own health with a suppliers right to risk the health of children. Not even a parent has that right. Safe packaging just isn't a constitutional issue.

    Edit: You also assume that suppliers don't ship outside of the US which isn't the case.

  8. #57
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    50

    Default

    If a supplier is MISLEADING by their claims, then it is the government's authority to step in (on a strictly philosophical level). Otherwise, it's nobodies business but my own.

    Via J.S. Mill, the foundational philosopher of all modern-day democratic systems.

  9. #58
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuck View Post
    You confuse your right to risk your own health with a suppliers right to risk the health of children. Not even a parent has that right. Safe packaging just isn't a constitutional issue.

    Edit: You also assume that suppliers don't ship outside of the US which isn't the case.
    Nuck,

    Did you read only half of the post and miss where I stated "in situations where I am endangering only myself, no one else"?

  10. #59
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vape4life View Post
    If a supplier is MISLEADING by their claims, then it is the government's authority to step in (on a strictly philosophical level). Otherwise, it's nobodies business but my own.
    On a strictly philosophical you are probably right. In the real world, governments enact laws to protect society. Traffic lights, product testing, product packaging, warning labels, etc can all be argued that they infringe on individual liberty. Absolute freedom in a society doesn't exist, never has and never will.

    The only real debate is how far a government can and should go in it's effort to protect. Arguing against safe packaging and labeling on a highly poisonous liquid that is bottled with candy flavorings is a bit silly. You can argue it, but I promise you, the governments are not going to agree.

  11. #60
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HK45 View Post
    Nuck,

    Did you read only half of the post and miss where I stated "in situations where I am endangering only myself, no one else"?
    I assumed you were referring to living alone with your liquid. Unfortunately, suppliers (which is the debate we are having) ship to a wide variety of people. If you want to take the liquid out of the safe packaging and have a bath in it, go for it. Nobody is trying to take that right away from you. We're just arguing the inevitability of safe packaging for the juice at a supplier level.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 26 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO