View Poll Results: What requirements should the FDA put on e-liquid?

Voters
76. You may not vote on this poll
  • Childproof caps

    59 77.63%
  • Prominent poison warnings on label

    58 76.32%
  • Ingredient listings on label

    60 78.95%
  • 3rd party analysis results available

    33 43.42%
  • Batch testing performed and certified

    39 51.32%
  • Restriction of sale to minors

    61 80.26%
  • Expiration date on label

    56 73.68%
  • Manufacturer listed on label

    47 61.84%
  • pH level listed on label

    10 13.16%
  • Nicotine concentration in standardized format [mg/ml] listed on label

    65 85.53%
  • Safety pamphlet in box (dosing, interaction, OD treatment info)

    49 64.47%
  • None at all

    5 6.58%
Multiple Choice Poll.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 26 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 256
Why shouldn't the FDA interfere? in Campaigning; Originally Posted by vape4life If a supplier is MISLEADING by their claims, then it is the government's authority to step ...
  1. #61
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vape4life View Post
    If a supplier is MISLEADING by their claims, then it is the government's authority to step in (on a strictly philosophical level). Otherwise, it's nobodies business but my own.

    Via J.S. Mill, the foundational philosopher of all modern-day democratic systems.
    vape4life,

    Couldn't agree more.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #62
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuck View Post
    I assumed you were referring to living alone with your liquid. Unfortunately, suppliers (which is the debate we are having) ship to a wide variety of people. If you want to take the liquid out of the safe packaging and have a bath in it, go for it. Nobody is trying to take that right away from you. We're just arguing the inevitability of safe packaging for the juice at a supplier level.
    Nuck,

    If you read a little further back in this thread you will see that it pertains mostly to the FDA's pending bans and regulations on e-cigs in general. That is my concern.
    Can't imagine why anyone would be arguing against child-proof packaging, although even that boils down to the responsibility of the parent to protect their own child, doesn't it?

  4. #63
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HK45 View Post
    Nuck,

    If you read a little further back in this thread you will see that it pertains mostly to the FDA's pending bans and regulations on e-cigs in general. That is my concern.
    Can't imagine why anyone would be arguing against child-proof packaging, although even that boils down to the responsibility of the parent to protect their own child, doesn't it?
    You're right. The thread topic has wandered a bit and I apologize. It's a bit of a button issue for me. I'll back off now

  5. #64
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,054

    Default

    Should add: I'm for liberty too with space for personal courage and independence.

    Still, no saint, was also thinking of myself as much as others.


  6. #65
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,233

    Default

    I think all drugs should be legalised, prohibition doesn't work, the only winners are the black marketeers.

  7. #66
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nealglover View Post
    The consumer has a lot of power to steer change.

    If we as the people who buy the liquids, only bought from the companies who currently use childproof packaging and clear labelling (TW UK and JC NA etc) then the other will need to shape up or ship out ??

    Also these companies are showing more responsibility, and not just trying to cash in the easy way, so they are the companies that we want to be fighting our corner when legislation is being discussed.

    The companies that have good labelling and packaging have already started to show a commitment to us, how about we do the same and force the rest to either follow suit or go out of business ?
    I think the best liquid is more important then child safety caps on bottles at the moment, just make she you keep your juice up where kids can not reach them, just like you would with bug spray, polish remover, guns, GLUE, ect....

    besides, when the FDA takes over they like to feel they are doing something, adding this child safety requirement would make them feel they did something
    Last edited by JJames68; 03-15-2009 at 06:24 PM.

  8. #67
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuck View Post
    You're right. The thread topic has wandered a bit and I apologize. It's a bit of a button issue for me. I'll back off now
    Nuck,

    No harm, no foul. :-) We all seem to be passionate about this and that is good. A little healthy debate never hurt anyone. Apology accepted but not necessary. Sorry if I was a little blunt.

  9. #68
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kate View Post
    I think all drugs should be legalised, prohibition doesn't work, the only winners are the black marketeers.
    while there are definitely some drugs I do not think people should do, I agree with you 100%

  10. #69
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran taukimada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tullahoma, Tn
    Posts
    1,452

    Default

    don't get me wrong here...

    i am FULLY for the idea of child-proofing the juice.. 100%

    but... the ultimate responsibility comes down to the user of the juice..

    i noted that someone equated it to the bleach under your kitchen sink... BINGO!!.. exactly WHY do children not grab that and drink it??.. simple.. they've been TAUGHT not to

    we've grown into a lazy world where we seem to think children come with their own set of instructions to save themselves and that the government should cover everything those instructions don't.

    if you have pets... and/or children.. keep stuff out of their everyday reach and TEACH your children not to play with the little bottles.. it really is that simple.. that responsibility falls on YOU.. not the government.. not the supplier.. YOU!

    warning labels.. ingredient lists... hellz yeah.. it's needed.. let's get there BEFORE they make us because then we've averted their eventual control for a while

    if the manufacturers and suppliers do the right things before the fda steps in we can mayhaps walk away without intervention.. it CAN be done.. just ask alcohol companies.. government backed off of them when they WILLINGLY removed billboard advertisements.. now here we are years later and the adverts are starting to pop up again.. and government hasn't even taken a second look.. YET... all because they did it on their own and showed they copuld be responsible if they needed to be.
    “You're perfect, yes it's true. But, without me, you're only you. Your menstruating heart just aint bleeding enough for two.”

  11. #70
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kate View Post
    I think all drugs should be legalised, prohibition doesn't work, the only winners are the black marketeers.
    Kate,

    Prohibition doesn't work and only creates rich thugs, violence, and death.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 26 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO